IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/002672/4054.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Global Impacts of Sea-level Rise: An assessment with the GEM-E3 model

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Pycroft
  • Juan Carlos Ciscar
  • Robert Nicholls

Abstract

The overall impact of sea-level rise (SLR) is one of the reasons of concern related to climate change (e.g. Smith et al., 2009). SLR can reach one metre by the end of the century, which might translate into large economic damages (World Bank, 2009). Sea level rise could severely affect productive activities located in the coastline (e.g. tourist resorts, industries such as refineries, and harbours). The objective of the article is to make an assessment of how much SLR can affect the world economy. Various assumptions on adaptation will be considered. The study will focus particularly on the relative importance of different impact categories. Some scenarios will focus on the damage from land loss (as was done, for example, in Bosello, 2011). Other scenarios will extend this analysis to take account of the costs of migration and sea floods, which together can account for more than 60% of the overall damage due to SLR (dependent on the extent of adaptation). This article will assess how much the global economic estimates change when this kind of broad coverage of economic damages is considered. This research builds on a previous study by Ciscar et al. (2011), which made a similar application for the case of Europe. The cost estimates of SLR come from the DIVA model (McFadden et al. 2007; Vafeidis et al. 2008). The DIVA model is an integrated model that can assess the consequences of SLR. It was used for assessing the impacts of SLR in Europe (Ciscar et al. 2011). The world GEM-E3 CGE model (Van Regemorter, 2005) is used to assess the economic impacts, following Ciscar et al. (2011). As noted, the model is shocked so as to reflect various impact categories. In particular, migration costs are interpreted as welfare losses and sea flood costs are modelled as productivity and capital losses. Alternative assumptions on how to shock the GEM-E3 model will be considered in order to assess their influence on the final results. Global economic damages from SLR will be computed for different climate change scenarios, comparing them under different assumptions on the implementation of the SLR coasts in the CGE model.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Pycroft & Juan Carlos Ciscar & Robert Nicholls, 2012. "Global Impacts of Sea-level Rise: An assessment with the GEM-E3 model," EcoMod2012 4054, EcoMod.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekd:002672:4054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/EcoMod%20paper%20-%20Impacts%20of%20high%20SLR_may2012_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tol, Richard S. J., 2011. "The Economic Impact of Climate Change in the 20th Century," Papers WP376, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    2. Richard Tol, 2012. "On the Uncertainty About the Total Economic Impact of Climate Change," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 53(1), pages 97-116, September.
    3. Robert E. Kopp & Frederik J. Simons & Jerry X. Mitrovica & Adam C. Maloof & Michael Oppenheimer, 2009. "Probabilistic assessment of sea level during the last interglacial stage," Nature, Nature, vol. 462(7275), pages 863-867, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    2. Stern, Nicholas, 2018. "Public economics as if time matters: Climate change and the dynamics of policy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 4-17.
    3. Pezzey, John C.V. & Burke, Paul J., 2014. "Towards a more inclusive and precautionary indicator of global sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 141-154.
    4. Matthias Blum & Eoin McLaughlin & Nick Hanley, 2019. "Accounting for Sustainable Development over the Long‐Run: Lessons from Germany," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 20(4), pages 410-446, November.
    5. Tsur, Yacov & Zemel, Amos, 2016. "Policy tradeoffs under risk of abrupt climate change," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 132(PB), pages 46-55.
    6. Changxin Liu & Hailing Zhang & Zheng Wang, 2019. "Study on the Functional Improvement of Economic Damage Assessment for the Integrated Assessment Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Richard Tol, 2015. "Bootstraps for Meta-Analysis with an Application to the Impact of Climate Change," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 287-303, August.
    8. Nicholas Stern, 2013. "The Structure of Economic Modeling of the Potential Impacts of Climate Change: Grafting Gross Underestimation of Risk onto Already Narrow Science Models," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 51(3), pages 838-859, September.
    9. Havranek, Tomas & Irsova, Zuzana & Janda, Karel & Zilberman, David, 2015. "Selective reporting and the social cost of carbon," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 394-406.
    10. Yacov Tsur & Cees Withagen, 2013. "Preparing for catastrophic climate change," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 225-239, November.
    11. Gregory Casey & Soheil Shayegh & Juan Moreno-Cruz & Martin Bunzl & Oded Galor & Ken Caldeira, 2019. "The Impact of Climate Change on Fertility," Working Papers 2019-2, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    12. Zhang, Hailing & Liu, Changxin & Wang, Can, 2021. "Extreme climate events and economic impacts in China: A CGE analysis with a new damage function in IAM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Greasley, David & Hanley, Nicholas & McLaughlin, Eoin & Oxley, Les, 2014. "The Emperor Has New Clothes: Empirical Tests of Mainstream Theories of Economic Growth," Stirling Economics Discussion Papers 2014-08, University of Stirling, Division of Economics.
    14. Richard S. J. Tol & Robert J. Nicholls & Sally Brown & Jochen Hinkel & Athanasios T. Vafeidis & Tom Spencer & Mark Schuerch, 2016. "Comment on ‘The Global Impacts of Extreme Sea-Level Rise: A Comprehensive Economic Assessment’," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 64(2), pages 341-344, June.
    15. Matsumoto, Shigeru & Iwata, Kazuyuki, 2019. "Do environmental rebates affect the replacement of durable products? An analysis of vehicle ownership duration in Japan," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 64-72.
    16. Osamu Nishiura & Makoto Tamura & Shinichiro Fujimori & Kiyoshi Takahashi & Junya Takakura & Yasuaki Hijioka, 2020. "An Assessment of Global Macroeconomic Impacts Caused by Sea Level Rise Using the Framework of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and Representative Concentration Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, May.
    17. Valeria Costantini & Anil Markandya & Elena Paglialunga & Giorgia Sforna, 2018. "Impact and distribution of climatic damages: a methodological proposal with a dynamic CGE model applied to global climate negotiations," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 35(3), pages 809-843, December.
    18. Wei Xie & Qi Cui & Tariq Ali, 2019. "Role of market agents in mitigating the climate change effects on food economy," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(3), pages 1215-1231, December.
    19. Philip Camill & Maryellen Hearn & Krista Bahm & Eileen Johnson, 2012. "Using a boundary organization approach to develop a sea level rise and storm surge impact analysis framework for coastal communities in Maine," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 111-130, June.
    20. Blum, Matthias & Hanley, Nicholas & McLaughlin, Eoin, 2013. "Genuine savings and future well-being in Germany, 1850-2000," Stirling Economics Discussion Papers 2013-13, University of Stirling, Division of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:002672:4054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.