IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abq/ijasd1/v5y2023i4p153-165.html

Navigating Agricultural Challenges in the Era of Climate Change: Insights, Innovations, and Sustainable Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Zanib Javed

    (Islamia College Lahore)

Abstract

Agriculture is at the forefront of climate change dynamics, contributing significantly to greenhouse gas emissions while grappling with the profound impacts of environmental shifts. Greenhouse agriculture, though enhancing crop efficiency, presents energy-intensive operations contributing to increased greenhouse gas emissions. Mitigation strategies involve transitioning to renewable energy sources and adopting Thermal EnergyStorage systems. Sustainable agricultural practices gain traction, driven by research initiatives utilizing stable isotope techniques. Challenges posed by monoculture and extensive chemical fertilizer use underscore the need for circular economy principles and mixed farming approaches. Precision Agriculture and Precision Livestock Farming integrated with Decision Support Systems offer advanced solutions for optimized resource utilization and reduced emissions. The study delves into greenhouse gas emissions, identifying methane and nitrous oxide as major contributors toagriculture. Global efforts to reduce methane levels aim for a 45% reduction by 2030, crucial for climate mitigation. The Solution4Farming platform, utilizing AIoT, streamlines GHG emissions management, emphasizing the importance of precise data collection and user-friendly interfaces. Challenges in accurately measuring emissions call for sophisticated DSS tools, aligning with IPCC methodologies. The agriculture sector's contribution to total greenhouse gas emissions in the EU is analyzed, highlighting reductions since 1990. Energy consumption in EU agriculture shows a 6% increase in associated emissions from 2004 to 2018, with variations among member states. Emission structures reveal diesel oil as a predominant contributor. FADN data categorize farms based on emissions, emphasizing animal production as a significant source. Fuels dominate emissions from energy inputs, particularly in horticultural crops. The research concludes with recommendations for future enhancements to the Solution4Farming platform, emphasizing global relevance, AI advancements, and IoT applications. The study underscores the importance of innovative strategies, precision technologies, and sustainable practices in addressing the complex challenges posed by agriculture in the context ofclimate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Zanib Javed, 2023. "Navigating Agricultural Challenges in the Era of Climate Change: Insights, Innovations, and Sustainable Solutions," International Journal of Agriculture & Sustainable Development, 50sea, vol. 5(4), pages 153-165, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:abq:ijasd1:v:5:y:2023:i:4:p:153-165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.xdgen.com/index.php/ijasd/article/view/206/221
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journal.xdgen.com/index.php/ijasd/article/view/206
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William D. Nordhaus, 1973. "The Allocation of Energy Resources," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 4(3), pages 529-576.
    2. Pellerin, Sylvain & Bamière, Laure & Angers, Denis & Béline, Fabrice & Benoit, Marc & Butault, Jean-Pierre & Chenu, Claire & Colnenne-David, Caroline & De Cara, Stéphane & Delame, Nathalie & Doreau, M, 2017. "Identifying cost-competitive greenhouse gas mitigation potential of French agriculture," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 130-139.
    3. Ramedani, Z. & Rafiee, S. & Heidari, M.D., 2011. "An investigation on energy consumption and sensitivity analysis of soybean production farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6340-6344.
    4. Richard Tol, 2012. "On the Uncertainty About the Total Economic Impact of Climate Change," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 53(1), pages 97-116, September.
    5. Thomas Slater & Anna E. Hogg & Ruth Mottram, 2020. "Ice-sheet losses track high-end sea-level rise projections," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(10), pages 879-881, October.
    6. James C. Zachos & Gerald R. Dickens & Richard E. Zeebe, 2008. "An early Cenozoic perspective on greenhouse warming and carbon-cycle dynamics," Nature, Nature, vol. 451(7176), pages 279-283, January.
    7. Nicholas Stern, 2013. "The Structure of Economic Modeling of the Potential Impacts of Climate Change: Grafting Gross Underestimation of Risk onto Already Narrow Science Models," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 51(3), pages 838-859, September.
    8. Lundström, Christina & Lindblom, Jessica, 2018. "Considering farmers' situated knowledge of using agricultural decision support systems (AgriDSS) to Foster farming practices: The case of CropSAT," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 9-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Gołasa & Marcin Wysokiński & Wioletta Bieńkowska-Gołasa & Piotr Gradziuk & Magdalena Golonko & Barbara Gradziuk & Agnieszka Siedlecka & Arkadiusz Gromada, 2021. "Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Agriculture, with Particular Emphasis on Emissions from Energy Used," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    3. Oliver Bettis & Simon Dietz & Nick Silver, 2015. "The risk of climate ruin," GRI Working Papers 217, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    4. Pezzey, John C.V. & Burke, Paul J., 2014. "Towards a more inclusive and precautionary indicator of global sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 141-154.
    5. Simon Dietz & Nicholas Stern, 2014. "Endogenous growth, convexity of damages and climate risk: how Nordhaus� framework supports deep cuts in carbon emissions," GRI Working Papers 159, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    6. Nicholas Stern, 2013. "The Structure of Economic Modeling of the Potential Impacts of Climate Change: Grafting Gross Underestimation of Risk onto Already Narrow Science Models," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 51(3), pages 838-859, September.
    7. Hjort, Ingrid, 2016. "Potential Climate Risks in Financial Markets: A Literature Overview," Memorandum 01/2016, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    8. Gregory Casey & Soheil Shayegh & Juan Moreno-Cruz & Martin Bunzl & Oded Galor & Ken Caldeira, 2019. "The Impact of Climate Change on Fertility," Department of Economics Working Papers 2019-04, Department of Economics, Williams College.
    9. Rising, James A. & Taylor, Charlotte & Ives, Matthew C. & Ward, Robert E.t., 2022. "Challenges and innovations in the economic evaluation of the risks of climate change," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114941, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Rising, James A. & Taylor, Charlotte & Ives, Matthew C. & Ward, Robert E.T., 2022. "Challenges and innovations in the economic evaluation of the risks of climate change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    11. Gabriele Standardi, 2023. "Exploring market-driven adaptation to climate change in a general equilibrium global trade model," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 1-29, February.
    12. Johannes Pfeiffer, 2017. "Fossil Resources and Climate Change – The Green Paradox and Resource Market Power Revisited in General Equilibrium," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 77, April.
    13. Ralph Hippe, 2015. "Why did the knowledge transition occur in the West and not in the East? ICT and the role of governments in Europe, East Asia and the Muslim world," GRI Working Papers 180, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    14. Joaquín Bernal-Ramírez & Jair Ojeda-Joya & Camila Agudelo-Rivera & Felipe Clavijo-Ramírez & Carolina Durana-Ángel & Clark Granger-Castaño & Daniel Osorio-Rodríguez & Daniel Parra-Amado & José Pulido &, 2022. "Impacto macroeconómico del cambio climático en Colombia," Revista ESPE - Ensayos sobre Política Económica, Banco de la Republica de Colombia, issue 102, pages 1-62, July.
    15. Stern, Nicholas, 2018. "Public economics as if time matters: Climate change and the dynamics of policy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 4-17.
    16. Balint, T. & Lamperti, F. & Mandel, A. & Napoletano, M. & Roventini, A. & Sapio, A., 2017. "Complexity and the Economics of Climate Change: A Survey and a Look Forward," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 252-265.
    17. Tabatabaie, Seyed Mohammad Hossein & Rafiee, Shahin & Keyhani, Alireza, 2012. "Energy consumption flow and econometric models of two plum cultivars productions in Tehran province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 211-216.
    18. Jamil, Faisal, 2012. "Impact of different public E&P policies on natural gas reserves and production in Pakistan," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 368-374.
    19. José A. Martínez-Casasnovas & Alexandre Escolà & Jaume Arnó, 2018. "Use of Farmer Knowledge in the Delineation of Potential Management Zones in Precision Agriculture: A Case Study in Maize ( Zea mays L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Dietz, Simon & Gollier, Christian & Kessler, Louise, 2018. "The climate beta," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 258-274.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abq:ijasd1:v:5:y:2023:i:4:p:153-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iqra Nazeer (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.