IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/140928.html

Housework, hygiene and health. Public expectations versus private limitations in working-class households in late-nineteenth and early-twentieth-century Britain

Author

Listed:
  • Horrell, Sara
  • Humphries, Jane

Abstract

Economic historians often attribute better health and hygiene in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries to improved domestic conditions, enabled by sanitary reform and the education of working-class women in household management. Instruction might have engendered a new esteem for cleanliness and comfort or greater awareness of the mechanisms of disease transmission, but it remains unclear how ordinary women translated the responsibility for their families’ health into improved domestic conditions. We examine the circumstances in which most women toiled to achieve the standards decreed. Despite the much-lauded sanitary reforms of the era, environments were challenging. Increased urbanisation, population growth, and over-crowded accommodation put demands on public provision of the clean water and sanitation essential to alleviate domestic squalor. Housing remained primitive and household budgets inadequate. Mothers laboured to launder their families’ clothes, to keep their children clean, and to create palatable meals with the meanest of resources. But sanitary infrastructure stopped outside working-class homes, water was supplied to external standpipes, and disposed of by hand into street drains, while flush toilets were few and far between forcing reliance on shared and filthy privy middens often located at some distance. Labour-saving appliances were uncommon, and nutritional adequacy hard to achieve on working-class incomes. Reformers thought that poor domestic sanitation, slum housing, overcrowding, and poverty should be remedied by private initiative not public intervention. Women heard the exhortations to protect their families from dearth, dirt, and disease, but it was only by dint of their own toil that they could compensate for the limitations that their circumstances imposed and begin to address the gulf between reality and public expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Horrell, Sara & Humphries, Jane, 2026. "Housework, hygiene and health. Public expectations versus private limitations in working-class households in late-nineteenth and early-twentieth-century Britain," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 140928, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:140928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/140928/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Gazeley & Sara Horrell, 2013. "Nutrition in the English agricultural labourer's household over the course of the long nineteenth century," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 66(3), pages 757-784, August.
    2. Ian Gazeley & Andrew Newell, 2013. "The First World War and working-class food consumption in Britain," European Review of Economic History, European Historical Economics Society, vol. 17(1), pages 71-94, February.
    3. Ian Gazeley & Andrew Newell, 2015. "Urban working-class food consumption and nutrition in Britain in 1904," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 68(1), pages 101-122, February.
    4. Toke S. Aidt & Romola J. Davenport & Felix Gray, 2023. "New perspectives on the contribution of sanitary investments to mortality decline in English cities, 1845–1909," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 76(2), pages 624-660, May.
    5. W. Walker Hanlon, 2024. "London Fog: A Century of Pollution and Mortality, 1866–1965," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(4), pages 910-923, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schneider, Eric, 2021. "The Effect of Nutritional Status on Historical Infectious Disease Morbidity: Evidence from the London Foundling Hospital, 1892-1919," CEPR Discussion Papers 16361, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    2. Pei Gao & Eric B. Schneider, 2021. "The growth pattern of British children, 1850–1975," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 74(2), pages 341-371, May.
    3. Neil Chalmers & Stacia Stetkiewicz & Padhmanand Sudhakar & Hibbah Osei-Kwasi & Christian J Reynolds, 2019. "Impacts of Reducing UK Beef Consumption Using a Revised Sustainable Diets Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Kota Ogasawara & Ian Gazeley & Eric B. Schneider, 2020. "Nutrition, Crowding, And Disease Among Low‐Income Households In Tokyo In 1930," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(1), pages 73-104, March.
    5. repec:ehl:lserod:111030 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:ehl:lserod:128850 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Galofré-Vilà, Gregori, 2018. "Growth and maturity: A quantitative systematic review and network analysis in anthropometric history," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 107-118.
    8. Karen Clay & Joshua Lewis & Edson Severnini & Xiao Wang, 2024. "The Value of Health Insurance during a Crisis: Effects of Medicaid Implementation on Pandemic Influenza Mortality," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(5), pages 1393-1402, September.
    9. Lavy, Victor & Rachkovski, Genia & Yoresh, Omry, 2025. "Heads up: Does air pollution cause workplace accidents?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    10. Gallardo Albarrán, Daniel, 2024. "The Global Sanitary Revolution in Historical Perspective," CEPR Discussion Papers 18754, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    11. Clay, Karen & Lewis, Joshua & Severnini, Edson, 2019. "What explains cross-city variation in mortality during the 1918 influenza pandemic? Evidence from 438 U.S. cities," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 42-50.
    12. Hanlon, W. Walker & Hansen, Casper Worm & Kantor, Jake, 2021. "Temperature, Disease, and Death in London: Analyzing Weekly Data for the Century from 1866 to 1965," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 81(1), pages 40-80, March.
    13. Benjamin Schneider, 2022. "Good Jobs and Bad Jobs in History," Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers _202, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    14. Engelbert Stockhammer & Joel Rabinovich & Niall Reddy, 2017. "Distribution, wealth and demand regimes in historical perspective. USA, UK, France and Germany, 1855-2010," Economics Discussion Papers 2017-5, School of Economics, Kingston University London.
    15. Mark Harrison, 2016. "Myths of the Great War," Studies in Economic History, in: Jari Eloranta & Eric Golson & Andrei Markevich & Nikolaus Wolf (ed.), Economic History of Warfare and State Formation, pages 135-158, Springer.
    16. von Hinke, Stephanie & Sørensen, Emil N., 2023. "The long-term effects of early-life pollution exposure: Evidence from the London smog," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Gallardo-Albarrán, Daniel & Jochemsen, Jurre, 2026. "The international diffusion of medical innovation since 1900: Revisiting the Preston curve," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    18. Luque de Haro, Víctor Antonio, 2024. "Social inequalities in adult mortality across Europe (18th-21st centuries): A critical analysis of theories and evidence," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    19. H. Spencer Banzhaf & William Mathews & Randall Walsh, 2024. "Hell with the Lid Off: Racial Segregation and Environmental Equity in America’s Most Polluted City," NBER Working Papers 32950, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Brian Beach & Karen Clay & Martin Saavedra, 2022. "The 1918 Influenza Pandemic and Its Lessons for COVID-19," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 60(1), pages 41-84, March.
    21. repec:ehl:lserod:100097 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Engelbert Stockhammer & Joel Rabinovich & Niall Reddy, 2018. "Distribution, wealth and demand regimes in historical perspective," FMM Working Paper 14-2018, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    23. Joël Floris & Kaspar Staub & Ulrich Woitek, 2016. "The benefits of intervention: birth weights in Basle 1912-1920," ECON - Working Papers 236, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:140928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.