IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/140772.html

Cultivating and embracing plurality in abductive inquiries within strategy research

Author

Listed:
  • Choudhury, Prithwiraj
  • Moeen, Mahka
  • Wormald, Audra

Abstract

Research Summary Abduction offers a mode of scientific inquiry that focuses on formulating explanations for unexplained phenomena. By building a bridge between philosophy of science and strategic management research, this article offers a pluralistic view of abduction, highlighting abductive triggers as the starting point in seeking explanations and the essential role of both creative and selective abduction in formulating explanations. Additionally, this article provides practical guidance for the design, execution, and evaluation of abductive research, including the usefulness of abduction for studies not designed as abductive. We offer orienting considerations about abduction's steps and elements, illustrate with examples, and outline potential missteps. Abduction does not lend itself to a fixed template, and we aim to lower the barriers to using abduction in strategic management research. Managerial Summary Abductive inquiry develops explanations for unexplained observations. This article connects philosophy of science with strategic management research to highlight the variety of forms abduction can take, including generating explanations in creative abduction and adjudicating explanations in selective abduction. By providing strategic management researchers with greater clarity about abductive inquiry, the article contributes to the development of explanatory insights that can help managers identify the causes underpinning organizational outcomes and make informed strategic decisions. This contribution is relevant because strategy is concerned with how interdependent organizational choices and actions influence outcomes, requiring managers not only to predict what may happen, but also to explain why outcomes occur so that they can intervene effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Choudhury, Prithwiraj & Moeen, Mahka & Wormald, Audra, 2026. "Cultivating and embracing plurality in abductive inquiries within strategy research," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 140772, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:140772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/140772/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard A. Bettis & Sendil Ethiraj & Alfonso Gambardella & Constance Helfat & Will Mitchell, 2016. "Creating repeatable cumulative knowledge in strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 257-261, February.
    2. Mahka Moeen & Rajshree Agarwal, 2017. "Incubation of an industry: Heterogeneous knowledge bases and modes of value capture," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 566-587, March.
    3. Andrew M. Carton, 2025. "The Six Dimensions of Strong Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 1242-1270, July.
    4. Sheen S. Levine & Oliver Schilke & Olenka Kacperczyk & Lynne G. Zucker, 2023. "Primer for Experimental Methods in Organization Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 1997-2025, November.
    5. Mahka Moeen & Will Mitchell, 2020. "How do pre‐entrants to the industry incubation stage choose between alliances and acquisitions for technical capabilities and specialized complementary assets?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(8), pages 1450-1489, August.
    6. Vivianna Fang He & Phanish Puranam & Yash Raj Shrestha & Georg von Krogh, 2020. "Resolving governance disputes in communities: A study of software license decisions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1837-1868, October.
    7. Melissa E. Graebner & Anne Marie Knott & Marvin B. Lieberman & Will Mitchell, 2023. "Empirical inquiry without hypotheses: A question‐driven, phenomenon‐based approach to strategic management research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 3-10, January.
    8. Sandeep Devanatha Pillai & Brent Goldfarb & David Kirsch, 2024. "Lovely and likely: Using historical methods to improve inference to the best explanation in strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 1539-1566, August.
    9. Prithwiraj Choudhury & Ryan T. Allen & Michael G. Endres, 2021. "Machine learning for pattern discovery in management research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 30-57, January.
    10. Francisco Polidoro & Charlotte Jacobs, 2024. "Knowledge diffusion in nascent industries: Asymmetries between startups and established firms in spurring inventions by other firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 807-845, April.
    11. Kristina McElheran & J. Frank Li & Erik Brynjolfsson & Zachary Kroff & Emin Dinlersoz & Lucia Foster & Nikolas Zolas, 2024. "AI adoption in America: Who, what, and where," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 375-415, March.
    12. Akhil Bhardwaj & Anastasia Sergeeva & Joseph Mahoney & Jackson Nickerson, 2025. "Theorizing as Problem Solving: A Pragmatist Perspective on the Logic of Pursuit," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 338-359, December.
    13. Xuege (Cathy) Lu & Hyeonsuh Lee & Ryan Coles, 2023. "Move Fast and Break Things? The Contingent Nature of Product Acceleration in Nascent Markets," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 484-507, December.
    14. Herman Aguinis & Angelo M. Solarino, 2019. "Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(8), pages 1291-1315, August.
    15. Rachelle C. Sampson & Yuan Shi, 2023. "Are U.S. firms becoming more short‐term oriented? Evidence of shifting firm time horizons from implied discount rates, 1980–2013," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 231-263, January.
    16. Wesley M. Cohen & Richard R. Nelson & John P. Walsh, 2003. "Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D," Chapters, in: Aldo Geuna & Ammon J. Salter & W. Edward Steinmueller (ed.), Science and Innovation, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Richard A. Bettis, 2012. "The search for asterisks: Compromised statistical tests and flawed theories," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 108-113, January.
    18. Kristin Behfar & Gerardo A. Okhuysen, 2018. "Perspective—Discovery Within Validation Logic: Deliberately Surfacing, Complementing, and Substituting Abductive Reasoning in Hypothetico-Deductive Inquiry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 323-340, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akhil Bhardwaj & Anastasia Sergeeva & Joseph Mahoney & Jackson Nickerson, 2025. "Theorizing as Problem Solving: A Pragmatist Perspective on the Logic of Pursuit," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 338-359, December.
    2. Seojin Kim & Rajshree Agarwal & Brent Goldfarb, 2026. "Creating Radical Technologies and Competencies: Revisiting Interorganizational Dynamics in the Nascent Bionic Prosthetic Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 272-301, January.
    3. Wu, Weiwei & Zhang, Yifan, 2025. "Artificial intelligence innovation and environmental performance: Unraveling the complex roles of application and method innovation across enterprise sizes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    4. Hensel, Przemysław G., 2019. "Supporting replication research in management journals: Qualitative analysis of editorials published between 1970 and 2015," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 45-57.
    5. Milan Miric & Nan Jia & Kenneth G. Huang, 2023. "Using supervised machine learning for large‐scale classification in management research: The case for identifying artificial intelligence patents," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 491-519, February.
    6. Mark D. Packard & Per L. Bylund, 2025. "Truth, knowledge, and entrepreneurship theory: arguments for a rationalist scientific epistemology," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 381-405, June.
    7. Elizabeth George Pontikes, 2022. "Category innovation in the software industry: 1990–2002," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(9), pages 1697-1727, September.
    8. Bas Bosma & Arjen Witteloostuijn, 2024. "Machine learning in international business," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(6), pages 676-702, August.
    9. Mahka Moeen & Rajshree Agarwal & Sonali K. Shah, 2020. "Building Industries by Building Knowledge: Uncertainty Reduction over Industry Milestones," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 218-244, September.
    10. Daan Kolkman & Gwendolyn K Lee & Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2024. "Data science and automation in the process of theorizing: Machine learning’s power of induction in the co-duction cycle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-30, November.
    11. Anderson, Brian S. & Wennberg, Karl & McMullen, Jeffery S., 2019. "Editorial: Enhancing quantitative theory-testing entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1-1.
    12. Wennberg, Karl & Anderson, Brian S. & McMullen, Jeffrey, 2019. "2 Editorial: Enhancing Quantitative Theory-Testing Entrepreneurship Research," Ratio Working Papers 323, The Ratio Institute.
    13. Eunhee Sohn & Robert Seamans & Daniel B. Sands, 2024. "Technology adoption and innovation: The establishment of airmail and aviation innovation in the United States, 1918–1935," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 3-35, January.
    14. Francisco Polidoro & Wei Yang, 2024. "Porting learning from interdependencies back home: Performance implications of multihoming for complementors in platform ecosystems," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(9), pages 1791-1821, September.
    15. Audra Wormald & Rajshree Agarwal & Serguey Braguinsky & Sonali K. Shah, 2021. "David overshadows Goliath: Specializing in generality for internationalization in the global mobile money industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(8), pages 1459-1489, August.
    16. Léonard Boussioux & Jacqueline N. Lane & Miaomiao Zhang & Vladimir Jacimovic & Karim R. Lakhani, 2024. "The Crowdless Future? Generative AI and Creative Problem-Solving," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1589-1607, September.
    17. Sheen S. Levine & Mark Bernard & Rosemarie Nagel, 2018. "Strategic intelligence: The cognitive capability to anticipate competitor behaviour," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 527-527, February.
    18. Dahlander, Linus & Beretta, Michela & Thomas, Arne & Kazemi, Shahab & Fenger, Morten H.J. & Frederiksen, Lars, 2023. "Weeding out or picking winners in open innovation? Factors driving multi-stage crowd selection on LEGO ideas," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(10).
    19. Ryan Allen & Aticus Peterson, 2026. "Intelligence Without Integrity: Why Capable LLMs May Undermine Reliability," Papers 2602.20440, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    20. Sands, Daniel B. & Sohn, Eunhee & Seamans, Robert, 2025. "Concept and creativity: Proof-of-concept demonstration and aviation innovation in the United States, 1894–1913," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(5).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:140772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.