IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orstsc/v10y2025i4p338-359.html

Theorizing as Problem Solving: A Pragmatist Perspective on the Logic of Pursuit

Author

Listed:
  • Akhil Bhardwaj

    (Managment Strategy and Organization, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AZ, United Kingdom)

  • Anastasia Sergeeva

    (Managment Strategy and Organization, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AZ, United Kingdom)

  • Joseph Mahoney

    (Gies College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801)

  • Jackson Nickerson

    (Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

Abstract

The growth of knowledge in strategic management hinges on developing novel research programs. However, the path from the discovery to the justification of research programs is fraught with hazards—most research directions that scholars pursue are unlikely to be fruitful. This paper introduces the logic of pursuit to strategy science to aid researchers in navigating these hazards and ascertaining whether they should continue working on a particular line of inquiry. Specifically, this paper considers theorizing as a problem-solving activity. It provides a five-phase trial-and-error approach that focuses on resolving doubt generated by anomalies and a lack of understanding of complex phenomena. At each phase of this journey, nonempirical indicators such as the economy of research guide scholars on whether to pursue their research program or to try alternative paths. Research programs that effectively address the problems for which they were devised are considered highly warranted and worthy of pursuit.

Suggested Citation

  • Akhil Bhardwaj & Anastasia Sergeeva & Joseph Mahoney & Jackson Nickerson, 2025. "Theorizing as Problem Solving: A Pragmatist Perspective on the Logic of Pursuit," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 338-359, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:10:y:2025:i:4:p:338-359
    DOI: 10.1287/stsc.2023.0075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0075
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/stsc.2023.0075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:10:y:2025:i:4:p:338-359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.