IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/117944.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Semiparametric Bayesian doubly robust causal estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Luo, Yu
  • Graham, Daniel J.
  • McCoy, Emma J.

Abstract

Frequentist semiparametric theory has been used extensively to develop doubly robust (DR) causal estimation. DR estimation combines outcome regression (OR) and propensity score (PS) models in such a way that correct specification of just one of two models is enough to obtain consistent parameter estimation. An equivalent Bayesian solution, however, is not straightforward as there is no obvious distributional framework to the joint OR and PS model, and the DR approach involves a semiparametric estimating equation framework without a fully specified likelihood. In this paper, we develop a fully semiparametric Bayesian framework for DR causal inference by bridging a nonparametric Bayesian procedure with empirical likelihood via semiparametric linear regression. Instead of specifying a fully probabilistic model, this procedure is only realized through relevant moment conditions. Crucially, this allows the posterior distribution of the causal parameter to be simulated via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. We show that the posterior distribution of the causal estimator satisfies consistency and the Bernstein–von Mises theorem, when either the OR or PS is correctly specified. Simulation studies suggest that our proposed method is doubly robust and can achieve the desired coverage rate. We also apply this novel Bayesian method to a real data example to assess the impact of speed cameras on car collisions in England.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo, Yu & Graham, Daniel J. & McCoy, Emma J., 2023. "Semiparametric Bayesian doubly robust causal estimation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117944, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:117944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/117944/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Mert Demirer & Esther Duflo & Christian Hansen & Whitney Newey & James Robins, 2018. "Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 21(1), pages 1-68, February.
    2. Erica E. M. Moodie & Thomas S. Richardson & David A. Stephens, 2007. "Demystifying Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 447-455, June.
    3. Alberto Abadie & Guido W. Imbens, 2016. "Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 781-807, March.
    4. Olli Saarela & David A. Stephens & Erica E. M. Moodie & Marina B. Klein, 2015. "On Bayesian estimation of marginal structural models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 279-288, June.
    5. Keisuke Hirano & Guido W. Imbens & Geert Ridder, 2003. "Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 1161-1189, July.
    6. Jinyong Hahn, 1998. "On the Role of the Propensity Score in Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 315-332, March.
    7. Chamberlain, Gary & Imbens, Guido W, 2003. "Nonparametric Applications of Bayesian Inference," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 12-18, January.
    8. Gustafson Paul, 2012. "Double-Robust Estimators: Slightly More Bayesian than Meets the Eye?," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Vaart,A. W. van der, 2000. "Asymptotic Statistics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521784504.
    10. Daniel J Graham & Cian Naik & Emma J McCoy & Haojie Li, 2019. "Do speed cameras reduce road traffic collisions?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Stephen Walker & Nils Lid Hjort, 2001. "On Bayesian consistency," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(4), pages 811-821.
    12. Luke Bornn & Neil Shephard & Reza Solgi, 2019. "Moment conditions and Bayesian non‐parametrics," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 81(1), pages 5-43, February.
    13. Siddhartha Chib & Minchul Shin & Anna Simoni, 2018. "Bayesian Estimation and Comparison of Moment Condition Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(524), pages 1656-1668, October.
    14. Weihua Cao & Anastasios A. Tsiatis & Marie Davidian, 2009. "Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(3), pages 723-734.
    15. S. A. Murphy, 2003. "Optimal dynamic treatment regimes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(2), pages 331-355, May.
    16. Nicole A. Lazar, 2003. "Bayesian empirical likelihood," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(2), pages 319-326, June.
    17. James M. Robins & Miguel A. Hernán & Larry Wasserman, 2015. "Discussion of “On Bayesian estimation of marginal structural models”," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 296-299, June.
    18. Susanne M. Schennach, 2005. "Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(1), pages 31-46, March.
    19. McCandless Lawrence C & Douglas Ian J. & Evans Stephen J. & Smeeth Liam, 2010. "Cutting Feedback in Bayesian Regression Adjustment for the Propensity Score," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-24, March.
    20. Sueishi, Naoya, 2013. "Identification problem of the exponential tilting estimator under misspecification," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 509-511.
    21. Olli Saarela & David A. Stephens & Erica E. M. Moodie & Marina B. Klein, 2015. "Rejoinder “On Bayesian estimation of marginal structural models”," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 299-301, June.
    22. Susanne M. Schennach, 2007. "Point estimation with exponentially tilted empirical likelihood," Papers 0708.1874, arXiv.org.
    23. O. Saarela & L. R. Belzile & D. A. Stephens, 2016. "A Bayesian view of doubly robust causal inference," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(3), pages 667-681.
    24. Masayuki Henmi & Shinto Eguchi, 2004. "A paradox concerning nuisance parameters and projected estimating functions," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(4), pages 929-941, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian J. Reich & Shu Yang & Yawen Guan & Andrew B. Giffin & Matthew J. Miller & Ana Rappold, 2021. "A Review of Spatial Causal Inference Methods for Environmental and Epidemiological Applications," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(3), pages 605-634, December.
    2. Yihui He & Fang Han, 2023. "On propensity score matching with a diverging number of matches," Papers 2310.14142, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    3. Zhichao Liu & Catherine Forbes & Heather Anderson, 2017. "Robust Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood method," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 21/17, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    4. A. Giffin & B. J. Reich & S. Yang & A. G. Rappold, 2023. "Generalized propensity score approach to causal inference with spatial interference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2220-2231, September.
    5. Siddhartha Chib & Minchul Shin & Anna Simoni, 2022. "Bayesian estimation and comparison of conditional moment models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(3), pages 740-764, July.
    6. Rahul Singh & Liyuan Xu & Arthur Gretton, 2020. "Kernel Methods for Causal Functions: Dose, Heterogeneous, and Incremental Response Curves," Papers 2010.04855, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    7. Isaiah Andrews & Anna Mikusheva, 2022. "Optimal Decision Rules for Weak GMM," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(2), pages 715-748, March.
    8. Huber, Martin, 2019. "An introduction to flexible methods for policy evaluation," FSES Working Papers 504, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Freiburg/Fribourg Switzerland.
    9. Rong Tang & Yun Yang, 2022. "Bayesian inference for risk minimization via exponentially tilted empirical likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1257-1286, September.
    10. Siddharta Chib & Minchul Shin & Anna Simoni, 2016. "Bayesian Empirical Likelihood Estimation and Comparison of Moment Condition Models," Working Papers 2016-21, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    11. Andrew Bennett & Nathan Kallus, 2020. "Efficient Policy Learning from Surrogate-Loss Classification Reductions," Papers 2002.05153, arXiv.org.
    12. Lee, Ying-Ying, 2018. "Efficient propensity score regression estimators of multivalued treatment effects for the treated," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 207-222.
    13. Kwun Chuen Gary Chan & Sheung Chi Phillip Yam & Zheng Zhang, 2016. "Globally efficient non-parametric inference of average treatment effects by empirical balancing calibration weighting," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(3), pages 673-700, June.
    14. Christoph Breunig & Ruixuan Liu & Zhengfei Yu, 2022. "Double Robust Bayesian Inference on Average Treatment Effects," Papers 2211.16298, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    15. Sung Jae Jun & Sokbae Lee, 2020. "Causal Inference under Outcome-Based Sampling with Monotonicity Assumptions," Papers 2004.08318, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    16. Waverly Wei & Maya Petersen & Mark J van der Laan & Zeyu Zheng & Chong Wu & Jingshen Wang, 2023. "Efficient targeted learning of heterogeneous treatment effects for multiple subgroups," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 1934-1946, September.
    17. Michael C. Knaus, 2021. "A double machine learning approach to estimate the effects of musical practice on student’s skills," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(1), pages 282-300, January.
    18. Michael C Knaus & Michael Lechner & Anthony Strittmatter, 2021. "Machine learning estimation of heterogeneous causal effects: Empirical Monte Carlo evidence," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 24(1), pages 134-161.
    19. Chunrong Ai & Oliver Linton & Kaiji Motegi & Zheng Zhang, 2021. "A unified framework for efficient estimation of general treatment models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), pages 779-816, July.
    20. Halbert White & Karim Chalak, 2013. "Identification and Identification Failure for Treatment Effects Using Structural Systems," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 273-317, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bayesian estimation; causal inference; double robustness; empirical likelihood; propensity score adjustments; semiparametric inference;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:117944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.