IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/egu/wpaper/2606.html

Critical Raw Materials and Open Strategic Autonomy in Europe: Targets, Resources and Geography

Author

Listed:
  • Diego Dessi
  • Simona Iammarino
  • Stefano Usai

Abstract

This paper examines the European Union (EU)’s strategy for securing Critical Raw Materials (CRMs) within the framework of Open Strategic Autonomy (OSA). As the green and digital transitions escalate global demand, the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) establishes ambitious 2030 targets for domestic extraction, processing, and recycling to reduce reliance on concentrated foreign suppliers. The study critically evaluates the EU’s main policy targets against the natural endowment of Strategic Raw Materials (SRMs) through global comparisons and subnational mapping at the NUTS-2 level. Findings indicate that European SRM resources are generally below global averages and highly concentrated in specific regions, predominantly in the Nordic countries and the Iberian Peninsula. We argue that CRMA’s top-down approach risks overlooking regional capabilities, geological constraints, and social responses from the communities involved. The paper suggests that without integrating place-based approaches and fostering equitable international interregional partnerships, the current strategy may undermine the EU’s pursuit of the targets of current industrial strategies for competitiveness and technological sovereignty.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego Dessi & Simona Iammarino & Stefano Usai, 2026. "Critical Raw Materials and Open Strategic Autonomy in Europe: Targets, Resources and Geography," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2606, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised May 2026.
    • Handle: RePEc:egu:wpaper:2606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg2606.pdf
    File Function: Version May 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, George Yunxiong & Iammarino, Simona, 2026. "Critical raw materials and the renewable energy transition: The role of domestic supply," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Radetzki, Marian & Eggert, Roderick G. & Lagos, Gustavo & Lima, Marcos & Tilton, John E., 2008. "The boom in mineral markets: How long might it last?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 125-128, September.
    3. Francesco Crespi & Serenella Caravella & Mirko Menghini & Chiara Salvatori, 2021. "European Technological Sovereignty: An Emerging Framework for Policy Strategy," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 56(6), pages 348-354, November.
    4. TRIPPL Michaela & SOETE Luc & KIVIMAA Paula & SCHWAAG SERGER Sylvia & KOUNDOURI Phoebe & PONTIKAKIS Dimitrios, 2024. "Addressing the regional dimension of open strategic autonomy and European green industrial policy," JRC Research Reports JRC136428, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Glöser, Simon & Tercero Espinoza, Luis & Gandenberger, Carsten & Faulstich, Martin, 2015. "Raw material criticality in the context of classical risk assessment," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 35-46.
    6. Andreas Diemer & Simona Iammarino & Richard Perkins & Axel Gros, 2025. "Technology, resources and geography in a paradigm shift: the case of critical and conflict materials in ICTs," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 2077326-207, December.
    7. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Federico Bartalucci, 2024. "The green transition and its potential territorial discontents," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 17(2), pages 339-358.
    8. Simona Iammarino & Andrés Rodriguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2019. "Regional inequality in Europe: evidence, theory and policy implications," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 273-298.
    9. Binz, Christian & Truffer, Bernhard, 2017. "Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 1284-1298.
    10. Nicolas Berman & Mathieu Couttenier & Dominic Rohner & Mathias Thoenig, 2017. "This Mine Is Mine! How Minerals Fuel Conflicts in Africa," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(6), pages 1564-1610, June.
    11. Zhang, Steven E. & Bourdeau, Julie E. & Nwaila, Glen T. & Ghorbani, Yousef, 2023. "Emerging criticality: Unraveling shifting dynamics of the EU's critical raw materials and their implications on Canada and South Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    12. Valverde-Carbonell, Jorge & Pietrobelli, Carlo & Menéndez, María de las Mercedes, 2024. "Minerals’ criticality and countries' mining competitiveness: Two faces of the same coin," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    13. Achzet, Benjamin & Helbig, Christoph, 2013. "How to evaluate raw material supply risks—an overview," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 435-447.
    14. Tröster, Bernhard & Papatheophilou, Simela & Küblböck, Karin, 2024. "In search of critical raw materials: What will the EU Critical Raw Materials Act achieve? An analysis of legal and factual implications of the CRMA," Research Reports 18/2024, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola Cortinovis, 2026. "Crowdfunding and industrial diversification," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2607, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised May 2026.
    2. Li, George Yunxiong & Ascani, Andrea & Iammarino, Simona, 2024. "The material basis of modern technologies. A case study on rare metals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    3. Caravella, Serenella & Crespi, Francesco & Cucignatto, Giacomo & Guarascio, Dario, 2023. "Technological Sovereignty and Strategic Dependencies: The case of the Photovoltaic Supply Chain," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1330, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    4. Francesco Molica & Francesco Cappellano & Teemu Makkonen, 2025. "Re-thinking Regional Innovation Systems in the age of de-globalization," Working Papers TIMES² 2025-080, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    5. Roberta Capello & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2025. "Europe’s Quest for Global Economic Relevance: On the Productivity Paradox and the Draghi Report," Scienze Regionali, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 7-15.
    6. Clement Bonnet & Samuel Carcanague & Emmanuel Hache & Gondia Seck & Marine Simoën, 2019. "Vers une Géopolitique de l'énergie plus complexe ? Une analyse prospective tridimensionnelle de la transition énergétique," Working Papers hal-02971706, HAL.
    7. Masoudi, S.M. & Ezzati, E. & Rashidnejad-Omran, N. & Moradzadeh, Ali, 2017. "Geoeconomics of fluorspar as strategic and critical mineral in Iran," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 100-106.
    8. Daw, Georges, 2025. "Revising the ‘Economic importance’ dimension: The European framework for critical raw materials, completed and illustrated using lithium," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Bach, Vanessa & Finogenova, Natalia & Berger, Markus & Winter, Lisa & Finkbeiner, Matthias, 2017. "Enhancing the assessment of critical resource use at the country level with the SCARCE method – Case study of Germany," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 283-299.
    10. Ojiambo N. Malala & Tsuyoshi Adachi, 2022. "Japan’s critical metals in the medium term: a quasi-dynamic approach incorporating probability," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(1), pages 87-101, March.
    11. Aiman Fadil & Paul Davis & John Geraghty, 2023. "A Mixed-Method Approach to Determine the Successful Factors Affecting the Criticality Level of Intermediate and Final Products on National Basis: A Case Study from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-29, March.
    12. Teixeira, Bernardo & Brito, Miguel Centeno & Mateus, António, 2024. "Raw materials for the Portuguese decarbonization roadmap: The case of solar photovoltaics and wind energy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Jasiński, Dominik & Cinelli, Marco & Dias, Luis C. & Meredith, James & Kirwan, Kerry, 2018. "Assessing supply risks for non-fossil mineral resources via multi-criteria decision analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 150-158.
    14. Dewulf, Jo & Blengini, Gian Andrea & Pennington, David & Nuss, Philip & Nassar, Nedal T., 2016. "Criticality on the international scene: Quo vadis?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 169-176.
    15. Bürgi Bonanomi, Elisabeth & Elsig, Manfred & Espa, Ilaria, 2015. "The Commodity Sector and Related Governance Challenges from a Sustainable Development Perspective: The Example of Switzerland Current Research Gaps," Papers 865, World Trade Institute.
    16. Francesco de Cunzo & Davide Consoli & Francois Perruchas & Angelica Sbardella, 2023. "Mapping Critical Raw Materials in Green Technologies," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2322, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Dec 2023.
    17. Clément Bonnet & Samuel Carcanague & Emmanuel Hache & Gondia Sokhna Seck & Marine Simoën, 2019. "Some Geopolitical issues of the Energy Transition," Working Papers hal-03191388, HAL.
    18. Helbig, Christoph & Bradshaw, Alex M. & Kolotzek, Christoph & Thorenz, Andrea & Tuma, Axel, 2016. "Supply risks associated with CdTe and CIGS thin-film photovoltaics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 422-433.
    19. Zhou, Na & Wu, Qiaosheng & Hu, Xiangping & Zhu, Yongguang & Su, Hui & Xue, Shuangjiao, 2020. "Synthesized indicator for evaluating security of strategic minerals in China: A case study of lithium," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    20. Bucciarelli, Pauline & Hache, Emmanuel & Mignon, Valérie, 2025. "Evaluating criticality of strategic metals: Are the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index and usual concentration thresholds still relevant?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:egu:wpaper:2606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask the person in charge to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deguunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.