IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecr/col022/45598.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Política de conteúdo local e incentivos financeiros no mercado de energia eólica no Brasil

Author

Listed:
  • Westin, Fernanda Fortes
  • Grottera, Carolina
  • Rennkamp, Britta

Abstract

Este estudo analisa o desenvolvimento da indústria de energia eólica no Brasil, com foco especial em Requisitos de Conteúdo Local (RCL). Políticas de conteúdo local são incentivos que visam melhorar o desenvolvimento tecnológico e industrial, ao condicionar a entrada em determinado mercado à utilização de bens e serviços fabricados nacionalmente. O programa brasileiro criou empregos na fabricação, instalação, operação e manutenção de componentes, ao mesmo tempo em que alcançou preços de energia muito competitivos por meio de um sistema de leilões. Uma análise de conteúdo qualitativa sobre os dados da indústria eólica foi realizada por meio de entrevistas com stakeholders do setor de energia eólica, além de documentos e notícias complementares. São discutidos os benefícios ambientais, econômicos e sociais proporcionados pelo desenvolvimento do setor eólico no Brasil, notadamente na geração de empregos, atração de investimentos, desenvolvimento regional, entre outros. As políticas de desenvolvimento do setor energia eólica no Brasil são analisadas à luz da abordagem cepalina do Big Push para a Sustentabilidade, ou seja, da possibilidade de que os investimentos no setor tenham contribuído para um grande impulso (Big Push) para um ciclo virtuoso de crescimento econômico, geração de empregos e redução dos impactos ambientais na produção de energia no Brasil.

Suggested Citation

  • Westin, Fernanda Fortes & Grottera, Carolina & Rennkamp, Britta, 2020. "Política de conteúdo local e incentivos financeiros no mercado de energia eólica no Brasil," Documentos de Proyectos 45598, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col022:45598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/45598
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Han, Jingyi & Mol, Arthur P.J. & Lu, Yonglong & Zhang, Lei, 2009. "Onshore wind power development in China: Challenges behind a successful story," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 2941-2951, August.
    2. Francisco M. Veloso, 2006. "Understanding Local Content Decisions: Economic Analysis And An Application To The Automotive Industry," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 747-772, October.
    3. Pereira, Enio B. & Martins, Fernando R. & Pes, Marcelo P. & da Cruz Segundo, Eliude I. & Lyra, André de A., 2013. "The impacts of global climate changes on the wind power density in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 107-110.
    4. -, 2019. "Alternativas para o desenvolvimento brasileiro: Novos horizontes para a mudança estrutural com igualdade," Oficina de la CEPAL en Brasilia (Estudios e Investigaciones) 44616, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    5. Gene M. Grossman, 1981. "The Theory of Domestic Content Protection and Content Preference," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 96(4), pages 583-603.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. -, 2021. "O Big Push para a Sustentabilidade e a dinâmica dos empregos: o trabalho no contexto da transformação social e ecológica da economia brasileira," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 47226 edited by Cepal.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Issabayev, Murat & Rizvanoghlu, Islam, 2019. "Optimal choice between local content requirement and fiscal policy in extractive industries: A theoretical analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-8.
    2. Dorothee Flaig & Susan F. Stone, 2017. "Local Content Requirements Versus Tariff Equivalents: How We Measure Matters," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(5), pages 931-948, May.
    3. Shiliang Cui & Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu, 2019. "Optimizing Local Content Requirements Under Technology Gaps," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 213-230, January.
    4. Evans, David K. & Ferreira, Francisco & Lofgren, Hans & Maliszewska, Maryla & Over, Mead & Cruz, Marcio, 2014. "Estimating the Economic Impact of the Ebola Epidemic: Evidence from Computable General Equilibrium Models," Conference papers 332557, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Uros Delevic & Irina Heim, 2017. "Institutions In Transition: Is The Eu Integration Process Relevant For Inward Fdi In Transition European Economies?," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 5(1), pages 16-32.
    6. Kalyuzhnova, Yelena & Azhgaliyeva, Dina & Belitski, Maksim, 2022. "Public Policy Instruments for Procurement: An Empirical Analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Chul‐Woo Kwon & Bong Geul Chun, 2009. "Local Content Requirement under Vertical Technology Diffusion," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 111-124, February.
    8. Macatangay, Rafael Emmanuel “Manny”, 2016. "Optimal local content requirement policies for extractive industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 244-252.
    9. Ronald Findlay & Stanislaw Wellisz, 1986. "Tariffs, quotas and domestic-content protection: some political economy considerations," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 221-242, January.
    10. Frank Yao Gbadago, 2025. "Analyzing local content and in-country spending requirements to advance technology transfers and support entrepreneurial development in Ghana’s upstream petroleum sector," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Paola Conconi & Manuel García-Santana & Laura Puccio & Roberto Venturini, 2018. "From Final Goods to Inputs: The Protectionist Effect of Rules of Origin," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(8), pages 2335-2365, August.
    12. Chen, Hao & Gao, Xin-Ya & Liu, Jian-Yu & Zhang, Qian & Yu, Shiwei & Kang, Jia-Ning & Yan, Rui & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2020. "The grid parity analysis of onshore wind power in China: A system cost perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 22-30.
    13. Li, X. & Hubacek, K. & Siu, Y.L., 2012. "Wind power in China – Dream or reality?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 51-60.
    14. Elkhan Richard Sadik-Zada & Wilhelm Loewenstein & Yadulla Hasanli, 2021. "Production linkages and dynamic fiscal employment effects of the extractive industries: input-output and nonlinear ARDL analyses of Azerbaijani economy," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 34(1), pages 3-18, April.
    15. Spencer, Barbara J., 1997. "Quota licenses for imported capital equipment: Could bureaucrats ever do better than the market?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1-2), pages 1-27, August.
    16. Qiu, Larry D. & Tao, Zhigang, 2001. "Export, foreign direct investment, and local content requirement," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 101-125, October.
    17. Brenck, Clara & Carvalho, Laura, 2020. "The equalizing spiral in early 21st century Brazil: a Kaleckian model with sectoral heterogeneity," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 298-310.
    18. Jacques, Armel, 2006. "Des firmes multinationales : un survol de la littérature microéconomique," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 82(4), pages 643-691, décembre.
    19. Yuan, Jiahai & Na, Chunning & Xu, Yan & Zhao, Changhong, 2015. "Wind turbine manufacturing in China: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1235-1244.
    20. Shih-Chieh Huang & Shang-Lien Lo & Yen-Ching Lin, 2013. "To Re-Explore the Causality between Barriers to Renewable Energy Development: A Case Study of Wind Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-24, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col022:45598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.