IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dia/wpaper/dt201616.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Low Income Countries and External Public Financing : Does Debt Relief Change Anything?

Author

Listed:
  • Marin Ferry

    () (LEDa, UMR DIAL, université Paris-Dauphine)

  • Marc Raffinot

    () (LEDa, UMR DIAL, université Paris-Dauphine)

  • Baptiste Venet

    () (LEDa, UMR DIAL, université Paris-Dauphine)

Abstract

(english) Low income countries (LICs) generally have very little access to the international financial markets. In the 1990s, bilateral creditors and international financial institutions started granting LICs debt relief under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPCs) initiatives and continued with the more recent Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI). Have these debt relief initiatives led official and private creditors to change their lending policy with respect to beneficiary countries? This paper addresses this question using difference-in-differences methodology. Our findings tend to show that official lenders tighten their HIPC financing policy, shortening grace and maturity periods, and reducing the grant element on new loans once debt relief has been provided. We also find that beneficiary governments manage to diversify their financing sources by borrowing more from private creditors once they have completed the HIPC process and have received additional debt cancellations under the MDRI. _________________________________ (français) Cet article évalue l'impact des initiatives d'allègement de dette multilatérale sur les conditions de réendettement extérieur des gouvernements bénéficiaires auprès de créanciers officiels et privés. Les résultats de cette étude indiquent qu'avoir bénéficié des initiatives PPTE (Pays Pauvres Très Endettés) et IADM (Initiative d’Annulation de Dette Multilatérale) conduit les gouvernements concernés à contracter des emprunts officiels comprenant des périodes de grâce et de maturité plus courtes (et donc un « élément-don » plus faible) que s'ils n'avaient obtenu ces annulations de dette. Nos résultats montrent également que les gouvernements bénéficiaires parviennent à emprunter davantage auprès de créanciers privés une fois leur dette annulée. Cependant, des tests additionnels révèlent que cet accès à de nouveaux marchés financiers ne s’effectue qu’après l’octroi des annulations de dette sous l’IADM et que les investisseurs internationaux privés ne s’autorisent donc à prêter aux PPTE qu’une fois la quasi-totalité de leur dette extérieure annulée.

Suggested Citation

  • Marin Ferry & Marc Raffinot & Baptiste Venet, 2016. "Low Income Countries and External Public Financing : Does Debt Relief Change Anything?," Working Papers DT/2016/16, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
  • Handle: RePEc:dia:wpaper:dt201616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.dial.ird.fr/media/ird-sites-d-unites-de-recherche/dial/documents/publications/doc_travail/2016/2016-16
    File Function: First version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elias Papaioannou & Gregorios Siourounis, 2008. "Democratisation and Growth," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(532), pages 1520-1551, October.
    2. Aguiar, Mark & Gopinath, Gita, 2006. "Defaultable debt, interest rates and the current account," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 64-83, June.
    3. Carmen M. Reinhart & Kenneth S. Rogoff, 2009. "Varieties of Crises and Their Dates," Introductory Chapters,in: This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly Princeton University Press.
    4. Alesina, Alberto & Dollar, David, 2000. "Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 33-63, March.
    5. Cuadra, Gabriel & Sapriza, Horacio, 2008. "Sovereign default, interest rates and political uncertainty in emerging markets," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 78-88, September.
    6. Gelos, R. Gaston & Sahay, Ratna & Sandleris, Guido, 2011. "Sovereign borrowing by developing countries: What determines market access?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, pages 243-254.
    7. Harrigan, Jane & Wang, Chengang & El-Said, Hamed, 2006. "The economic and political determinants of IMF and world bank lending in the Middle East and North Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 247-270, February.
    8. Marin Ferry, 2015. "The Carrot and Stick Approach to Debt Relief : Overcoming Moral Hazard," Working Papers DT/2015/14, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    9. Paul Clist & Oliver Morrissey, 2011. "Aid and tax revenue: Signs of a positive effect since the 1980s," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(2), pages 165-180, March.
    10. Sanjeev Gupta & Amine Mati & Emanuele Baldacci, 2008. "Is it (Still) Mostly Fiscal? Determinants of Sovereign Spreads in Emerging Markets," IMF Working Papers 08/259, International Monetary Fund.
    11. Maurice Obstfeld & Kenneth S. Rogoff, 1996. "Foundations of International Macroeconomics," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262150476, January.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4089 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Graham Bird & Dane Rowlands, 2001. "IMF lending: how is it affected by economic, political and institutional factors?," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 243-270.
    14. Knight, Malcolm & Santaella, Julio A., 1997. "Economic determinants of IMF financial arrangements," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 405-436, December.
    15. Danny Cassimon & Bjorn Van campenhout, 2008. "Comparative Fiscal Response Effects Of Debt Relief: An Application To African Hipcs," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 76(3), pages 427-442, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Debt Relief; low-income countries; access to financial markets; concessionality.;

    JEL classification:

    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • F34 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Lending and Debt Problems
    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dia:wpaper:dt201616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Loic Le Pezennec). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/diallfr.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.