IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cue/wpaper/awp-06-2026.html

Promoting music through user-generated content? The diverse effects of TikTok on music discovery

Author

Listed:
  • Wojciech Hardy

    (University of Warsaw)

  • Satia Rożynek

    (University of Warsaw)

Abstract

TikTok and its user-generated short-form videos have largely disrupted the ways in which labels and artists used to promote their music. Numerous cases emerged of older songs randomly getting a second life or of artists building their careers TikTok-first. Yet, the debate on broader effects of short-form videos on music still echoes the 2000s concerns on digital piracy: is it additional promotion, or substitution for other channels? We study this in the context of the strategically important chart longevity across four diverse platforms: major and smaller audio streaming (Spotify and Deezer), audio-visual streaming (YouTube) and a discovery tool (Shazam). We analyse whether time and country-specific TikTok reach allowed songs going viral in the platform to retain their positions for longer at music charts and apply propensity score matching to study the effects across songs with similar TikTok virality potential. We find that the effects of TikTok are not uniform and seem stronger for Deezer, YouTube and Shazam than for Spotify. They also seem more positive for more recent songs on audio streaming services but with opposite being true for YouTube and Shazam. We discuss these findings in the context of other research in different contexts, mainstreaminess, (re)discovery channels and promotion.

Suggested Citation

  • Wojciech Hardy & Satia Rożynek, 2026. "Promoting music through user-generated content? The diverse effects of TikTok on music discovery," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-06-2026, Association for Cultural Economics International.
  • Handle: RePEc:cue:wpaper:awp-06-2026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://files.culturaleconomics.org/papers/AWP-06-2026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D26 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Crowd-Based Firms
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cue:wpaper:awp-06-2026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Crosby (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aceiiea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.