IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cue/wpaper/awp-04-2026.html

Careers of Female Artists: Gender Bias in Institutional Visibilty and Secondary Market Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Laura J. Noll

    (ZHAW School of Management and Law)

  • Matthias Sahli

    (Bern University of Applied Sciences)

Abstract

This article studies gender differences in museum exhibitions and examines how institutional visibility in art museums relates to outcomes in the secondary art market. We analyze more than 21,000 exhibition records and link them to about 33,000 painting auction transactions. We document three main findings. First, female artists remain substantially underrepresented in exhibitions, with persistent cohort heterogeneity. Second, on the auction market, artworks by women are more likely to reach reserve and sell, although average prices remain lower. Third, linking both markets, we construct an event-time exhibition exposure measure based on the timing of exhibitions around auctions and estimate dynamic responses. Auction prices increase three to five years after exhibitions, while sale probabilities show no systematic reaction, with effects concentrated among male artists. Finally, exploiting the Guerrilla Girls’ 1989 campaign as an activist shock, a difference-in-differences design yields suggestive evidence of a modest and only temporary shift toward female exhibitions in the United States. Overall, the results highlight exhibitions as a key allocative mechanism in cultural markets and illustrate how institutional visibility and activism may shape market outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura J. Noll & Matthias Sahli, 2026. "Careers of Female Artists: Gender Bias in Institutional Visibilty and Secondary Market Outcomes," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-04-2026, Association for Cultural Economics International.
  • Handle: RePEc:cue:wpaper:awp-04-2026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://files.culturaleconomics.org/papers/AWP-04-2026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frietsch, Rainer & Haller, Inna & Funken-Vrohlings, Melanie & Grupp, Hariolf, 2009. "Gender-specific patterns in patenting and publishing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 590-599, May.
    2. Lisa Farrell & Jane M. Fry & Tim R. L. Fry, 2021. "Gender differences in hammer prices for Australian Indigenous art," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(1), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Heinrich W. Ursprung & Christian Wiermann, 2011. "Reputation, Price, And Death: An Empirical Analysis Of Art Price Formation," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 49(3), pages 697-715, July.
    4. Laurie Cameron & William N. Goetzmann & Milad Nozari, 2019. "Art and gender: market bias or selection bias?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 43(2), pages 279-307, June.
    5. Victor Ginsburgh & David Throsby, 2006. "Handbook of the economics of art and culture," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/1673, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Hellmanzik, Christiane, 2016. "Historic art exhibitions and modern - day auction results," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 421-430.
    7. Borowiecki, Karol Jan & Dahl, Christian Møller, 2021. "What makes an artist? The evolution and clustering of creative activity in the US since 1850," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    8. Fabian Y. R. P. Bocart & Marina Gertsberg & Rachel A. J. Pownall, 2022. "An empirical analysis of price differences for male and female artists in the global art market," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 46(3), pages 543-565, September.
    9. Elba Mauleón & María Bordons, 2010. "Male and female involvement in patenting activity in Spain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(3), pages 605-621, June.
    10. Corinna Czujack, 1997. "Picasso Paintings at Auction, 1963–1994," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 21(3), pages 229-247, September.
    11. Corinna Czujack, 1997. "Picasso paintings at auction, 1963-1994," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/193273, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    12. Gema Lax Martínez & Julio Raffo & Kaori Saito, 2016. "Identifying the Gender of PCT inventors," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 33, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    13. Borowiecki,Karol J. & Gray,Charles M. & Heilbrun,James, 2023. "The Economics of Art and Culture," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521690423, Enero-Abr.
    14. V.A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (ed.), 2006. "Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture," Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 1, number 1, December.
    15. Alexander Cuntz & Matthias Sahli, 2024. "Intermediary liability and trade in follow-on innovation," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 48(1), pages 1-42, March.
    16. Marinelli, Nicoletta & Palomba, Giulio, 2011. "A model for pricing Italian Contemporary Art paintings at auction," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 212-224, May.
    17. Sun, Liyang & Abraham, Sarah, 2021. "Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 175-199.
    18. Etro, Federico & Stepanova, Elena, 2021. "Art return rates from old master paintings to contemporary art," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 94-116.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prieto-Rodriguez, Juan & Vecco, Marilena, 2021. "Reading between the lines in the art market: Lack of transparency and price heterogeneity as an indicator of multiple equilibria," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Matthias Florian Sahli & Alexander Cuntz, 2026. "Is there a premium for legacy artists? The death effect in exhibition shows and auction transactions," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 50(1), pages 1-34, March.
    3. Dominik Filipiak & Agata Filipowska, 2016. "Towards data oriented analysis of the art market: survey and outlook," "e-Finanse", University of Information Technology and Management, Institute of Financial Research and Analysis, vol. 12(1), pages 21-31, June.
    4. Andrew M. Jones & Roberto Zanola, 2015. "Does the law of one price hold in non-standard investment markets? Why selling picasso in New York is differents," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-04-2015, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised May 2015.
    5. Vecco, Marilena & Prieto-Rodriguez, Juan & Teerink, Simone, 2024. "Climbing the ladder? The gender gap in art prices across artists’ cohorts in the Dutch art market," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    6. Andrew M. Jones & Roberto Zanola, 2011. "Retransformation bias in the adjacent art price index," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-01-2011, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised Jul 2011.
    7. Alexander Cuntz & Matthias Sahli, 2023. "Ars longa, vita brevis: The death of the creator and the impact on exhibitions and auction markets," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 76, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    8. Szyszka Adrianna & Białowąs Sylwester, 2019. "Prices of works of art by living and deceased artists auctioned in Poland from 1989 to 2012," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 5(4), pages 112-127, December.
    9. Bronwyn Coate & Tim R.L. Fry, 2012. "Better off Dead? Prices Realised for Australian Paintings Sold at Auction," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-02-2012, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised Feb 2012.
    10. Michel Clement & Anke Lepthien & Tim Schulze, 2016. "Erfolgsfaktoren bei der Vermarktung von Kunst [Success Factors for Marketing of Arts]," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 68(4), pages 377-400, December.
    11. Adri De Ridder & Steffen Eriksen & Bert Scholtens, 2024. "The art of valuation: Using visual analysis to price classical paintings by Swedish Masters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Filipiak Dominik & Filipowska Agata, 2016. "Towards Data Oriented Analysis of the Art Market: Survey and Outlook," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 21-31.
    13. Régis Blazy & Marie Blum, 2022. "Horizontal and vertical differentiation in comic art auctions," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(3), pages 1382-1415, July.
    14. Domingo Sifontes & Rosa Morales, 2020. "Gender differences and patenting in Latin America: understanding female participation in commercial science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2009-2036, September.
    15. Erica Coslor & Tim R. L. Fry, 2025. "Misattribution stigma and contagion: How did the art auction market react to Australian “Black art scandals”?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 49(3), pages 547-578, September.
    16. Itaya, Jun-ichi & Ursprung, Heinrich W., 2016. "Price and death: modeling the death effect in art price formation," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 431-445.
    17. Zanola, Roberto & Vecco, Marilena & Jones, Andrew, 2021. "A place for everything and everything in its place: New York's role in the art market," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 215-224.
    18. Barnes, Spencer & Mendez, Brandon & Schrowang, Andrew, 2024. "Analysts’ accuracy following an increase in uncertainty: Evidence from the art market," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    19. Jenny Rae Hawkins & Viplav Saini, 2014. "Returns on Indian Art during 2000-2013," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-03-2014, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised Jun 2014.
    20. Géraldine David & Yuexin Li & Kim Oosterlinck & Luc Renneboog, 2024. "Art in times of crisis," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1362-1413, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cue:wpaper:awp-04-2026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Crosby (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aceiiea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.