IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cte/wsrepe/43773.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Quantile Neural Network Framework for Twostage Stochastic Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Tsay, Calvin

Abstract

Two-stage stochastic programming is a popular framework for optimization under uncertainty, where decision variables are split between first-stage decisions, and second-stage (or recourse) decisions, with the latter being adjusted after uncertainty is realized. These problems are often formulated using Sample Average Approximation (SAA), where uncertainty is modeled as a finite set of scenarios, resulting in a large “monolithic” problem, i.e., where the model is repeated for each scenario. The resulting models can be challenging to solve, and several problem-specific decomposition approaches have been proposed. An alternative approach is to approximate the expected second-stage objective value using a surrogate model, which can then be embedded in the first-stage problem to produce good heuristic solutions. In this work, we propose to instead model the distribution of the second-stage objective, specifically using a quantile neural network. Embedding this distributional approximation enables capturing uncertainty and is not limited to expected-value optimization, e.g., the proposed approach enables optimization of the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR). We discuss optimization formulations for embedding the quantile neural network and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework using several computational case studies including a set of mixed-integer optimization problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsay, Calvin, 2024. "A Quantile Neural Network Framework for Twostage Stochastic Optimization," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 43773, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
  • Handle: RePEc:cte:wsrepe:43773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/rest/api/core/bitstreams/099feb9a-b9bf-4052-9353-8cbe953f4c7b/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahmutoğulları, Ali İrfan & Çavuş, Özlem & Aktürk, M. Selim, 2018. "Bounds on risk-averse mixed-integer multi-stage stochastic programming problems with mean-CVaR," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 595-608.
    2. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    3. Cornuejols, G. & Sridharan, R. & Thizy, J. M., 1991. "A comparison of heuristics and relaxations for the capacitated plant location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 280-297, February.
    4. Powell, Warren B., 2019. "A unified framework for stochastic optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 795-821.
    5. David Bergman & Teng Huang & Philip Brooks & Andrea Lodi & Arvind U. Raghunathan, 2022. "JANOS: An Integrated Predictive and Prescriptive Modeling Framework," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 807-816, March.
    6. Artur M. Schweidtmann & Alexander Mitsos, 2019. "Deterministic Global Optimization with Artificial Neural Networks Embedded," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 180(3), pages 925-948, March.
    7. Santoso, Tjendera & Ahmed, Shabbir & Goetschalckx, Marc & Shapiro, Alexander, 2005. "A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 96-115, November.
    8. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    9. Körpeoglu, Ersin & Yaman, Hande & Selim Aktürk, M., 2011. "A multi-stage stochastic programming approach in master production scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 166-179, August.
    10. W. Ackooij & I. Danti Lopez & A. Frangioni & F. Lacalandra & M. Tahanan, 2018. "Large-scale unit commitment under uncertainty: an updated literature survey," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(1), pages 11-85, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu Su & Changhyun Kwon, 2020. "Risk-Averse Network Design with Behavioral Conditional Value-at-Risk for Hazardous Materials Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 184-203, January.
    2. Salo, Ahti & Andelmin, Juho & Oliveira, Fabricio, 2022. "Decision programming for mixed-integer multi-stage optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 550-565.
    3. F. W. Meng & J. Sun & M. Goh, 2010. "Stochastic Optimization Problems with CVaR Risk Measure and Their Sample Average Approximation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 399-418, August.
    4. Ghaffarinasab, Nader & Çavuş, Özlem & Kara, Bahar Y., 2023. "A mean-CVaR approach to the risk-averse single allocation hub location problem with flow-dependent economies of scale," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 32-53.
    5. Cui, Xueting & Zhu, Shushang & Sun, Xiaoling & Li, Duan, 2013. "Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric Value-at-Risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2124-2139.
    6. Pu Huang & Dharmashankar Subramanian, 2012. "Iterative estimation maximization for stochastic linear programs with conditional value-at-risk constraints," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 441-458, November.
    7. Malavasi, Matteo & Ortobelli Lozza, Sergio & Trück, Stefan, 2021. "Second order of stochastic dominance efficiency vs mean variance efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1192-1206.
    8. Rostagno, Luciano Martin, 2005. "Empirical tests of parametric and non-parametric Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) measures for the Brazilian stock market index," ISU General Staff Papers 2005010108000021878, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    9. Andreas H Hamel, 2018. "Monetary Measures of Risk," Papers 1812.04354, arXiv.org.
    10. Steven Kou & Xianhua Peng, 2014. "On the Measurement of Economic Tail Risk," Papers 1401.4787, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2015.
    11. So Yeon Chun & Alexander Shapiro & Stan Uryasev, 2012. "Conditional Value-at-Risk and Average Value-at-Risk: Estimation and Asymptotics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 739-756, August.
    12. Alois Pichler, 2013. "Premiums And Reserves, Adjusted By Distortions," Papers 1304.0490, arXiv.org.
    13. Alexander, Gordon J. & Baptista, Alexandre M. & Yan, Shu, 2013. "A comparison of the original and revised Basel market risk frameworks for regulating bank capital," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 249-268.
    14. Pritsker, Matthew, 2006. "The hidden dangers of historical simulation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 561-582, February.
    15. Topaloglou, Nikolas & Vladimirou, Hercules & Zenios, Stavros A., 2008. "A dynamic stochastic programming model for international portfolio management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1501-1524, March.
    16. Lisa R. Goldberg & Ola Mahmoud, 2014. "Drawdown: From Practice to Theory and Back Again," Papers 1404.7493, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2016.
    17. Alexander, Gordon J. & Baptista, Alexandre M. & Yan, Shu, 2012. "When more is less: Using multiple constraints to reduce tail risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 2693-2716.
    18. Kull, Andreas, 2009. "Sharing Risk – An Economic Perspective," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 591-613, November.
    19. Madadi, AliReza & Kurz, Mary E. & Mason, Scott J. & Taaffe, Kevin M., 2014. "Supply chain design under quality disruptions and tainted materials delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 105-123.
    20. Mahmutoğulları, Ali İrfan & Çavuş, Özlem & Aktürk, M. Selim, 2018. "Bounds on risk-averse mixed-integer multi-stage stochastic programming problems with mean-CVaR," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 595-608.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Optimization under uncertainty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cte:wsrepe:43773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Poveda (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://portal.uc3m.es/portal/page/portal/dpto_estadistica .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.