IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v54y2020i1p184-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-Averse Network Design with Behavioral Conditional Value-at-Risk for Hazardous Materials Transportation

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Su

    (Customer Technology, Walmart Labs, San Bruno, California 94066;)

  • Changhyun Kwon

    (Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620)

Abstract

We consider a road-ban problem in hazardous material (hazmat) transportation. We formulate the problem as a network design problem to select a set of closed road segments for hazmat traffic and obtain a bilevel optimization problem. While modeling probabilistic route choices of hazmat carriers by the random utility model (RUM) in the lower level, we consider a risk-averse measure called conditional value at risk (CVaR) in the upper level, instead of the widely used expected risk measure. Using the RUM and CVaR, we quantify the risk of having hazmat accidents and large consequences and design the network policy for road bans accordingly. Although CVaR has been used in hazmat routing problems, this paper is the first attempt to apply CVaR in risk averse hazmat network design problems considering stochastic route choices of hazmat carriers. The resulting problem is a mixed integer nonlinear programming problem, for which we devise a line search approach combined with Benders decomposition. We demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed computational method with case studies. The average computation time for a network with 105 nodes and 268 arcs is three hours. By applying CVaR to the route-choice behavior of hazmat carriers, we protect the road network from undesirable route choices that may lead to severe consequences. We define the value of RUM-CVaR solutions (VRCS) over the deterministic model based on shortest-path problems and the expected risk measure. Our case study shows that the VRCS can range from 4.9% to 64.1% depending on the probability threshold used in the CVaR measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Su & Changhyun Kwon, 2020. "Risk-Averse Network Design with Behavioral Conditional Value-at-Risk for Hazardous Materials Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 184-203, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:54:y:2020:i:1:p:184-203
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2019.0925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2019.0925
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.2019.0925?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yingying Kang & Rajan Batta & Changhyun Kwon, 2014. "Value-at-Risk model for hazardous material transportation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 361-387, November.
    2. Changhyun Kwon & Taehan Lee & Paul Berglund, 2013. "Robust shortest path problems with two uncertain multiplicative cost coefficients," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(5), pages 375-394, August.
    3. Iakovos Toumazis & Changhyun Kwon & Rajan Batta, 2013. "Value-at-Risk and Conditional Value-at-Risk Minimization for Hazardous Materials Routing," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Rajan Batta & Changhyun Kwon (ed.), Handbook of OR/MS Models in Hazardous Materials Transportation, edition 127, pages 127-154, Springer.
    4. Patrice Marcotte & Anne Mercier & Gilles Savard & Vedat Verter, 2009. "Toll Policies for Mitigating Hazardous Materials Transport Risk," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 228-243, May.
    5. Jin Y. Yen, 1971. "Finding the K Shortest Loopless Paths in a Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(11), pages 712-716, July.
    6. Erhan Erkut & Armann Ingolfsson, 2000. "Catastrophe Avoidance Models for Hazardous Materials Route Planning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 165-179, May.
    7. Liu, Haoxiang & Wang, David Z.W., 2015. "Global optimization method for network design problem with stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 20-39.
    8. Fontaine, Pirmin & Minner, Stefan, 2018. "Benders decomposition for the Hazmat Transport Network Design Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 996-1002.
    9. Hess, Stephane & Quddus, Mohammed & Rieser-Schüssler, Nadine & Daly, Andrew, 2015. "Developing advanced route choice models for heavy goods vehicles using GPS data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 29-44.
    10. Longsheng Sun & Mark H. Karwan & Changhyun Kwon, 2018. "Generalized Bounded Rationality and Robust Multicommodity Network Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 42-57, 1-2.
    11. Quattrone, Agata & Vitetta, Antonino, 2011. "Random and fuzzy utility models for road route choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1126-1139.
    12. Liu Su & Longsheng Sun & Mark Karwan & Changhyun Kwon, 2019. "Spectral risk measure minimization in hazardous materials transportation," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(6), pages 638-652, June.
    13. Vedat Verter & Bahar Y. Kara, 2008. "A Path-Based Approach for Hazmat Transport Network Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 29-40, January.
    14. Longsheng Sun & Mark H. Karwan & Changhyun Kwon, 2016. "Robust Hazmat Network Design Problems Considering Risk Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 1188-1203, November.
    15. Carlos F. Daganzo & Yosef Sheffi, 1977. "On Stochastic Models of Traffic Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 253-274, August.
    16. Santoso, Tjendera & Ahmed, Shabbir & Goetschalckx, Marc & Shapiro, Alexander, 2005. "A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 96-115, November.
    17. Esfandeh, Tolou & Kwon, Changhyun & Batta, Rajan, 2016. "Regulating hazardous materials transportation by dual toll pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 20-35.
    18. Daniel McFadden, 1975. "The Revealed Preferences of a Government Bureaucracy: Theory," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 6(2), pages 401-416, Autumn.
    19. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    20. Hosseini, S. Davod & Verma, Manish, 2018. "Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) methodology to optimal train configuration and routing of rail hazmat shipments," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 79-103.
    21. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    22. Honghua Jin & Rajan Batta, 1997. "Objectives Derived form Viewing Hazmat Shipments as a Sequence of Independent Bernoulli Trials," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 252-261, August.
    23. Davis, Gary A., 1994. "Exact local solution of the continuous network design problem via stochastic user equilibrium assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 61-75, February.
    24. George F. List & Pitu B. Mirchandani & Mark A. Turnquist & Konstantinos G. Zografos, 1991. "Modeling and Analysis for Hazardous Materials Transportation: Risk Analysis, Routing/Scheduling and Facility Location," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 100-114, May.
    25. Iakovos Toumazis & Changhyun Kwon, 2016. "Worst-Case Conditional Value-at-Risk Minimization for Hazardous Materials Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 1174-1187, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Gendreau, Michel & Pirayesh, Amir & Ghasemaghaei, Ali & Salehi, Vahid, 2022. "Hazardous material transportation problems: A comprehensive overview of models and solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 1-38.
    2. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Cao, Yunzhi, 2021. "The optimal recovery-fund based strategy for uncertain supply chain disruptions: A risk-averse two-stage stochastic programming approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Bogyrbayeva, Aigerim & Kwon, Changhyun, 2021. "Pessimistic evasive flow capturing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 133-148.
    4. Zhaoqi Zang & Richard Batley & Xiangdong Xu & David Z. W. Wang, 2022. "On the value of distribution tail in the valuation of travel time variability," Papers 2207.06293, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    5. Tao, Liangyan & Liu, Sifeng & Xie, Naiming & Javed, Saad Ahmed, 2021. "Optimal position of supply chain delivery window with risk-averse suppliers: A CVaR optimization approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Gendreau, Michel & Pirayesh, Amir & Ghasemaghaei, Ali & Salehi, Vahid, 2022. "Hazardous material transportation problems: A comprehensive overview of models and solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 1-38.
    2. Hosseini, S. Davod & Verma, Manish, 2018. "Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) methodology to optimal train configuration and routing of rail hazmat shipments," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 79-103.
    3. Fontaine, Pirmin & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Gendreau, Michel & Minner, Stefan, 2020. "Population-based risk equilibration for the multimode hazmat transport network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 188-200.
    4. Bhavsar, Nishit & Verma, Manish, 2022. "A subsidy policy to managing hazmat risk in railroad transportation network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 633-646.
    5. Tolou Esfandeh & Rajan Batta & Changhyun Kwon, 2018. "Time-Dependent Hazardous-Materials Network Design Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 454-473, March.
    6. Fontaine, Pirmin & Minner, Stefan, 2018. "Benders decomposition for the Hazmat Transport Network Design Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 996-1002.
    7. Bronfman, Andrés & Marianov, Vladimir & Paredes-Belmar, Germán & Lüer-Villagra, Armin, 2015. "The maximin HAZMAT routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 15-27.
    8. Yan Sun & Xinya Li & Xia Liang & Cevin Zhang, 2019. "A Bi-Objective Fuzzy Credibilistic Chance-Constrained Programming Approach for the Hazardous Materials Road-Rail Multimodal Routing Problem under Uncertainty and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, May.
    9. Bronfman, Andrés & Marianov, Vladimir & Paredes-Belmar, Germán & Lüer-Villagra, Armin, 2016. "The maxisum and maximin-maxisum HAZMAT routing problems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 316-333.
    10. Kumar, Anand & Roy, Debjit & Verter, Vedat & Sharma, Dheeraj, 2018. "Integrated fleet mix and routing decision for hazmat transportation: A developing country perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 225-238.
    11. Francisco López-Ramos & Stefano Nasini & Armando Guarnaschelli, 2019. "Road network pricing and design for ordinary and hazmat vehicles: Integrated model and specialized local search," Post-Print hal-02510066, HAL.
    12. Bogyrbayeva, Aigerim & Kwon, Changhyun, 2021. "Pessimistic evasive flow capturing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 133-148.
    13. Liping Liu & Jiaming Li & Lei Zhou & Tijun Fan & Shuxia Li, 2021. "Research on Route Optimization of Hazardous Materials Transportation Considering Risk Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Ke, Ginger Y. & Zhang, Huiwen & Bookbinder, James H., 2020. "A dual toll policy for maintaining risk equity in hazardous materials transportation with fuzzy incident rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    15. Wang, Jinpei & Bai, Xuejie & Liu, Yankui, 2023. "Globalized robust bilevel optimization model for hazmat transport network design considering reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    16. Ditta, A. & Figueroa, O. & Galindo, G. & Yie-Pinedo, R., 2019. "A review on research in transportation of hazardous materials," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. F. W. Meng & J. Sun & M. Goh, 2010. "Stochastic Optimization Problems with CVaR Risk Measure and Their Sample Average Approximation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 399-418, August.
    18. Zhang, Lukai & Feng, Xuesong & Chen, Dalin & Zhu, Nan & Liu, Yi, 2019. "Designing a hazardous materials transportation network by a bi-level programming based on toll policies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    19. Fernández, Elena & Hinojosa, Yolanda & Puerto, Justo & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2019. "New algorithmic framework for conditional value at risk: Application to stochastic fixed-charge transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 215-226.
    20. Ghaffarinasab, Nader & Çavuş, Özlem & Kara, Bahar Y., 2023. "A mean-CVaR approach to the risk-averse single allocation hub location problem with flow-dependent economies of scale," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 32-53.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:54:y:2020:i:1:p:184-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.