IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cte/wsrepe/10009.html

Some remarks on estimating a covariance structure model from a sample correlation matrix

Author

Listed:
  • Maydeu Olivares, Alberto
  • Hernández Estrada, Adolfo

Abstract

A popular model in structural equation modeling involves a multivariate normal density with a structured covariance matrix that has been categorized according to a set of thresholds. In this setup one may estimate the covariance structure parameters from the sample tetrachoricl polychoric correlations but only if the covariance structure is scale invariant. Doing so when the covariance structure is not scale invariant results in estimating a more restricted covariance structure than the one intended. When the covariance structure is not scale invariant, then the model parameters must be estimated jointly from the sample thresholds and tetrachoricl polychoric correlations. In general, when fitting a covariance structure from a sample correlation matrix one should consider the population correlation structure under the null hypothesis. This is obtained by pre and post-multiplying the covariance structure by a diagonal matrix consisting of the inverse of the square root of the diagonal of the covariance structure under consideration. We provide computer algebra code for assessing whether a covariance structure is scale invariant and for assessing the identification of threshold and correlation structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Maydeu Olivares, Alberto & Hernández Estrada, Adolfo, 2000. "Some remarks on estimating a covariance structure model from a sample correlation matrix," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 10009, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    • Handle: RePEc:cte:wsrepe:10009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/rest/api/core/bitstreams/d594d286-2783-4690-a73f-48cb8c12ce5a/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karl Jöreskog, 1994. "On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 381-389, September.
    2. Albert Satorra & Peter Bentler, 2001. "A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 507-514, December.
    3. Beth Reboussin & Kung-Yee Liang, 1998. "An estimating equations approach for the LISCOMP model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 165-182, June.
    4. Karl Jöreskog, 1978. "Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 443-477, December.
    5. M. Browne & A. Shapiro, 1991. "Invariance of covariance structures under groups of transformations," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 345-355, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D. Gunzler & W. Tang & N. Lu & P. Wu & X. Tu, 2014. "A Class of Distribution-Free Models for Longitudinal Mediation Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 543-568, October.
    2. Laura Vieten & Anne Marit Wöhrmann & Alexandra Michel, 2022. "Work-Time Control and Exhaustion: Internal Work-to-Home Interference and Internal Home-to-Work Interference as Mediators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Sik-Yum Lee & S. Wang, 1996. "Sensitivity analysis of structural equation models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 93-108, March.
    4. Ruth Hancock & Marcello Morciano & Stephen Pudney & Francesca Zantomio, 2015. "Do household surveys give a coherent view of disability benefit targeting?: a multisurvey latent variable analysis for the older population in Great Britain," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 178(4), pages 815-836, October.
    5. Alcántara-Pilar, Juan Miguel & Del Barrio-García, Salvador & Rodríguez-López, Mª Eugenia, 2018. "Does language matter? A cross-national comparison of the moderating effect of language on website information-processing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 66-78.
    6. Flore Geukens & Annette Spithoven & Margot Bastin & Janne Vanhalst & Marlies Maes, 2022. "Lonely in Different Relationships: Bidirectional Effects between Parent- and Peer-Related Loneliness in Adolescence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-10, June.
    7. Peter Tavel & Bibiana Jozefiakova & Peter Telicak & Jana Furstova & Michal Puza & Natalia Kascakova, 2022. "Psychometric Analysis of the Shortened Version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale on the Slovak Population (SWBS-Sk)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, January.
    8. Andrea Zammitti & Isabella Valbusa & Sara Santilli & Maria Cristina Ginevra & Salvatore Soresi & Laura Nota, 2023. "Development and Validation of the Decent Work for Inclusive and Sustainable Future Construction Scale in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Po-Hsien Huang, 2017. "Asymptotics of AIC, BIC, and RMSEA for Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(2), pages 407-426, June.
    10. Klitmøller, Anders & Lauring, Jakob, 2016. "When distance is good: A construal level perspective on perceptions of inclusive international language use," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 276-285.
    11. Sai-fu Fung & Esther Oi-wah Chow & Chau-kiu Cheung, 2020. "Development and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of a Brief Wisdom Development Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Kaiguang Wang & Yuelin Gao, 2019. "Topology Structure Implied in β -Hilbert Space, Heisenberg Uncertainty Quantum Characteristics and Numerical Simulation of the DE Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Lu, Lei & Zhou, Yiyong & Li, Guiquan, 2026. "The paradoxical consequences of high performers: how and when subordinate performance drives paradoxical leader behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    14. Smith, Kenneth J. & Emerson, David J., 2017. "An analysis of the relation between resilience and reduced audit quality within the role stress paradigm," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-14.
    15. Sohn, Stefanie, 2017. "A contextual perspective on consumers' perceived usefulness: The case of mobile online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 22-33.
    16. Siu Hing Lo & Gerard J.P. Van Breukelen & Gjalt-Jorn Y. Peters & Gerjo Kok, 2014. "Teleconference Use among Office Workers: An Interorganizational Comparison of an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Casidy, Riza & Wymer, Walter, 2016. "A risk worth taking: Perceived risk as moderator of satisfaction, loyalty, and willingness-to-pay premium price," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 189-197.
    18. HAFNER, Christian & LINTON, Oliver B. & TANG, Haihan, 2016. "Estimation of a Multiplicative Covariance Structure in the Large Dimensional Case," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2016044, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    19. Piotr Tarka, 2018. "An overview of structural equation modeling: its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 313-354, January.
    20. de Bruijn, Ernst-Jan & Antonides, Gerrit, 2020. "Determinants of financial worry and rumination," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cte:wsrepe:10009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Poveda (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://portal.uc3m.es/portal/page/portal/dpto_estadistica .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.