IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ctc/serie5/dipe0037.html

Assessing changes in EU innovation policy programs: from SME instrument to EIC accelerator for start-up funding

Author

Listed:
  • Maria del Sorbo

    (European Innovation Council, Bruxelles, Belgium)

  • Carina Faber

    (European Innovation Council, Bruxelles, Belgium)

  • Marco Grazzi

    (Dipartimento di Politica Economica, DISCE, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano, Italy)

  • Francesco Matteucci

    (European Innovation Council, Bruxelles, Belgium)

  • Miriam Ruß

    (Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie gGmbH, Wuppertal, Germany)

Abstract

A novel analysis of the European Innovation Council (EIC) Accelerator pilot is presented, marking the first extensive examination of its selection process and the impact of its funding on deep tech ventures, in comparison to its predecessor, the SME Instrument. Utilizing applicant data from both programs, the study assesses the EIC’s effectiveness in targeting firms that align with its objectives of driving breakthrough innovation. The research reveals that the EIC Accelerator pilot attracts younger and smaller firms, in comparison to its predecessor. A significantly higher proportion of applicants are high tech and medium high-tech, indicating a strategic shift towards supporting cutting-edge technologies. Despite this shift, the analysis of funding determinants demonstrates a consistent pattern across both programs, emphasizing the influence of firm size, age, and patent portfolio. Further, a regression discontinuity design analysis is used to estimate the impact of funding during the EIC accelerator pilot on firm-level outcomes, such as patenting, revenue, or employment growth. However, the very recent launch of the program shrinks both the observations and the ex-post window, and due to large standard errors the point estimates are not significant at conventional levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria del Sorbo & Carina Faber & Marco Grazzi & Francesco Matteucci & Miriam Ruß, 2024. "Assessing changes in EU innovation policy programs: from SME instrument to EIC accelerator for start-up funding," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Politica Economica dipe0037, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    • Handle: RePEc:ctc:serie5:dipe0037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dipartimenti.unicatt.it/politica-economica-DIPE0037.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Bloom & John Van Reenen & Heidi Williams, 2019. "A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(3), pages 163-184, Summer.
    2. van den Heuvel, Matthias & Popp, David, 2023. "The role of venture capital and governments in clean energy: lessons from the first cleantech bubble," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    3. Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro & Francis Narin, 2018. "European Paradox or Delusion—Are European Science and Economy Outdated?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 14-23.
    4. Matias D. Cattaneo & Luke Keele & Rocío Titiunik & Gonzalo Vazquez-Bare, 2021. "Extrapolating Treatment Effects in Multi-Cutoff Regression Discontinuity Designs," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(536), pages 1941-1952, October.
    5. Nicholas Bloom & John Van Reenen & Heidi Williams, 2019. "A toolkit of policies to promote innovation," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 10.
    6. Hahn, Jinyong & Todd, Petra & Van der Klaauw, Wilbert, 2001. "Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression-Discontinuity Design," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 201-209, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah Armitage & Noël Bakhtian & Adam Jaffe, 2024. "Innovation Market Failures and the Design of New Climate Policy Instruments," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(1), pages 4-48.
    2. Fernando Alexandre & Miguel Chaves & Miguel Portela, 2025. "Investment grants and firms’ productivity: how effective is a grant booster shot?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 1601-1641, April.
    3. Jason Potts & Andrew Torrance & Dietmar Harhoff & Eric von Hippel, 2024. "Profiting from Data Commons: Theory, Evidence, and Strategy Implications," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Cátia Rosário & Celeste Varum & Anabela Botelho, 2024. "The Role of Public Incentives in Promoting Innovation: An Analysis of Recurrently Supported Companies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Anastasios Evgenidis & Apostolos Fasianos, 2025. "AI news shocks and the macroeconomy: evidence from UK patent data," IFS Working Papers W25/48, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Martin Beraja & David Y Yang & Noam Yuchtman, 2023. "Data-intensive Innovation and the State: Evidence from AI Firms in China," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(4), pages 1701-1723.
    7. Yang, Xiaoyin & Zhang, Xinmin & Zang, Hong & Chu, Hongcong & Feng, Chao, 2025. "From shadows to spotlight: How big data bureaus unveil corporate R&D gaming?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PG).
    8. Dhami, Sanjit & Zeppini, Paolo, 2025. "Green technology adoption under uncertainty, increasing returns, and complex adaptive dynamics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    9. Joseph Owuondo, 2023. "A Comparative Study of Entrepreneurial Education and Startup Ecosystems: United States vs. Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(10), pages 115-123, October.
    10. Magnus Henrekson & Christian Sandström & Mikael Stenkula, 2024. "Seven reasons why mission‐oriented innovation policies seldom work in practice," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 354-362, June.
    11. Yuta Okamoto & Yuuki Ozaki, 2024. "On Extrapolation of Treatment Effects in Multiple-Cutoff Regression Discontinuity Designs," Papers 2412.04265, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    12. Gianluca Biggi & Martina Iori & Julia Mazzei & Andrea Mina, 2025. "Green intelligence: the AI content of green technologies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(3), pages 803-840, September.
    13. Wang, Xianbin & Zheng, Xitian & Cao, Dan, 2026. "Does innovation policy promote innovation? Evidence from innovation targets in China's five-year plans," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Cristina CRISTE & Ciel BOVARY (MAN) & Nicoleta-Claudia MOLDOVAN & Raluca RĂCĂTĂIAN & Oana-Ramona LOBONȚ, 2024. "Eu Capacity To Bolster And Stimulate Research And Innovation: Who Is The Leader In Development?," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 19(2), pages 60-77, August.
    15. Long, Xianling & Wang, Zhiqiang, 2025. "From heat to high-tech: How innovation responds to climate change," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    16. Gianluca Pallante & Emanuele Russo & Andrea Roventini, 2020. "Does mission-oriented funding stimulate private R&D? Evidence from military R&D for US states," Working Papers hal-04097530, HAL.
    17. Magnus Henrekson & Mikael Stenkula, 2024. "Bottom-Up Policies Trump Top-Down Missions," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Magnus Henrekson & Christian Sandström & Mikael Stenkula (ed.), Moonshots and the New Industrial Policy, pages 309-331, Springer.
    18. Kumar, Amit & Operti, Elisa, 2025. "Recessions, institutions, and regional exploration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    19. Tom Krebs, 2023. "Modern Climate Policy: Moving beyond the market-liberal paradigm," Working Papers 1, Forum New Economy.
    20. Peter Claeys & Juan Jung & Gonzalo Gómez-Bengoechea, 2024. "Laggards v Leaders: Productivity and Innovation Catchup," Working Papers 2024.01, International Network for Economic Research - INFER.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctc:serie5:dipe0037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabio Montobbio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dscatit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.