IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The Multi-Function Polis 1987-97: An International Failure or Innovative Local Project?

Listed author(s):
  • Paul Parker
Registered author(s):

    The Multi-function Polis (MFP) has created debate and divided opinions since it was first proposed by Japan’s Minister for International Trade and Industry in 1987. The announcement of its official demise by the South Australian Premier in August 1997 following the termination of federal funding in 1996 appeared to complete the story. However, opinions remain divided as to whether the project was a A$100 million waste of taxpayers money or a valuable initiative to promote urban redevelopment in an environmentally and socially responsible manner. This paper reviews the debate by recognising the changing roles of international and local actors. The interaction between international and domestic politics has received increased attention in the literature on Pacific relations and development initiatives. In its first phase, the Multifunction Polis was supported by the Japanese and Australian federal governments, but received strong local opposition. In the second phase, Japanese and Australian federal government support for the project waned, but local support grew as state and local governments promoted the project because of its potential to meet local needs. However, by 1997 the project had failed to attract large scale external investment and it was integrated into state government efforts to promote development in the core of Adelaide. This Australian case study of a Japanese proposal for a futuristic high tech city for interaction among the People of the Pacific, offers lessons for other international development initiatives.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Australia-Japan Research Centre, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University in its series Asia Pacific Economic Papers with number 283.

    in new window

    Length: 27 pages
    Date of creation: Sep 1998
    Handle: RePEc:csg:ajrcau:283
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Canberra ACT 2601

    Phone: (61-2) 6249 3780
    Fax: (61-2) 6249 3941
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. K Olds, 1995. "Globalization and the production of new urban spaces: Pacific Rim megaprojects in the late 20th century," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 27(11), pages 1713-1743, November.
    2. K Olds, 1995. "Globalization and the Production of New Urban Spaces: Pacific Rim Megaprojects in the Late 20th Century," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(11), pages 1713-1743, November.
    3. Putnam, Robert D., 1988. "Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(03), pages 427-460, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csg:ajrcau:283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Akira Kinefuchi)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.