IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Subjective well-being, disability and adaptation: A case study from rural Ethiopia

Listed author(s):
  • Marcel Fafchamps
  • Bereket Kebede

In many developing countries poor infrastructure – including sanitation and health facilities – exposes the population to high risks of disability. Low standards of health and safety at work and at home, coupled with political, ethnic, and domestic violence, also contribute to raising the risk of becoming physically disabled. The effect of physical disability on people’s lives is likely to be worse than in developed economies because of the reliance on physical labour for income generation – for example, in farming. Higher levels of national income and technological capability may also enable societies to make the investments required to enable disabled individuals to be productively employed. Finally, since formal social insurance is usually lacking in developing countries, the effect of disability on welfare is expected to be higher as disabled people must rely on social networks that have limited capacity to pool risks (Fafchamps and Lund, 2003). However there are also factors that tend to lower the proportion of disabled individuals in poor societies. The first one is lower life expectancy. In developed economies, the incidence of disability typically increases with age (e.g., loss of eyesight and hearing, paralysis due to stroke). This means that, other things being equal, populations with a larger proportion of elderly people have a larger proportion of disabled individuals. Put differently, many people in poor rural economies do not live long enough to become disabled. The second reason is that disability may have such dire consequences in terms of lost income and lack of support that disabled individuals have a much shorter life expectancy than they would have in a developed economy. If this is the case, the proportion of disabled individuals in the population may be low even though the risk of disability is high. In spite of the fact that disability is an important welfare concern, socio-economic studies on the effect of disability in developing countries are few in number. This chapter seeks to fill this gap by documenting the incidence of different forms of disabilities in rural Ethiopia. Using cross-sectional data from the Ethiopian Rural Household Survey collected in 2004, we examine the relationship between disability and welfare as captured by subjective well-being and self-reported wealth ranking questions. In particular, we test whether the negative effect of disability on welfare decreases over time. If it does, this would suggest that over time people adapt to disability. We also investigate whether the negative effect of disability on subjective well-being operates primarily through reduced material welfare. Empirical results indicate that, as expected, disability has a significant negative impact on welfare. This is true whether the person who answered the subjective well¬being question herself is disabled, or whether the disabled person is another member of the household. Even though we find some weak indication of adaptation with respect to specific forms of disabilities, the overall weight of empirical results suggests little adaptation: disability is associated with a lower subjective well-being irrespective of the time elapsed since the onset of the disability. We also find that, in the studied population, disability is associated with significantly lower material welfare. This lower material welfare is the main channel through which disability reduces subjective well-being. These findings stand in contrast with the psychology literature which has found that, in developed economies, the negative effect of well-being on subjective welfare becomes attenuated over time. But they are consistent with the local context: in an economy where there is no social protection against disability and where production depends on physical labour, disabled individuals are less able to contribute to household income, and this permanently reduces the household’s material welfare. This explains why the negative effect of disability on well-being is shared by all household members, whether or not they are themselves disabled. We should stress that, since we only have cross-section data, we cannot control for unobserved heterogeneity. In particular we cannot entirely eliminate the possibility that the relationship between material poverty and disability results from poor households having a higher risk of disability. We also cannot control for selectivity, that is, the possibility that a number disabled individuals are not observed in our data either because they left the household – e.g., to become beggars – or because they died prematurely as a result of abandonment or neglect (e.g., Miguel (2005). If this were the case, our results would underestimate the incidence of disability. To the extent that poor households are less able to care for disabled individuals, selectivity bias would affect poor households more, which means that the relationship between disability and material poverty may even be stronger than suggested by our results. To disentangle these issues longitudinal data on well-being and disability is necessary. The evidence presented here is nevertheless sufficiently strong to suggest that such longitudinal data should be collected. This chapter is structured in the following way. The next section briefly discusses the link between welfare, disability, and adaptation in general, and posits the adaptation hypothesis that is pursued in the empirical part of the chapter. Section 8.3 presents the survey from which the data are sourced and reports a number of descriptive results on the distribution of subjective well-being and disability as captured by the data. Section 8.4 presents the different tests for the existence of adaptation among households with disabled people in rural areas of Ethiopia. In Section 8.5 we investigate the relationship between disability and material welfare. Section 8.6 provides the conclusions.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford in its series CSAE Working Paper Series with number 2008-01.

in new window

Date of creation: 2008
Handle: RePEc:csa:wpaper:2008-01
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Manor Road, Oxford, OX1 3UQ

Phone: +44-(0)1865 271084
Fax: +44-(0)1865 281447
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Fafchamps, Marcel & Shilpi, Forhad, 2008. "Subjective welfare, isolation, and relative consumption," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 43-60, April.
  2. Blanchflower, David G. & Oswald, Andrew J., 2004. "Well-being over time in Britain and the USA," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(7-8), pages 1359-1386, July.
  3. Oswald, Andrew J. & Powdthavee, Nattavudh, 2008. "Does happiness adapt? A longitudinal study of disability with implications for economists and judges," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(5-6), pages 1061-1077, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csa:wpaper:2008-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Richard Payne)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.