IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/12611.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lie Symmetries and Essential Restrictions in Economic Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Perets, Gadi
  • Yashiv, Eran

Abstract

In optimization problems in Economics there are explicit or implicit assumptions about the underlying structure. In particular, one typically assumes that optimal behavior will remain invariant, in a sense to be precisely defined. Inter alia, this relates to the rationale for empirical estimation of invariant structural models. This paper has three goals. First, to show how relevant restrictions pertaining to this invariance can be derived using the algebraic technique of Lie symmetries of differential equations. Importantly, the symmetries provide solutions of the optimization problems in question or generate rich information with respect to the properties of the solutions, when no closed-form solutions exist. Second, to provide an example of implementation of this algebra, using an issue of substance, thereby gaining insight on a key topic in utility theory and consumer-investor choice. Third, to outline topics that are at the research frontier, which would be amenable to such analysis, thereby providing a road map for a potentially important new literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Perets, Gadi & Yashiv, Eran, 2018. "Lie Symmetries and Essential Restrictions in Economic Optimization," CEPR Discussion Papers 12611, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=12611
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pintus, Patrick A., 2007. "Local determinacy with non-separable utility," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 669-682, February.
    2. Yves Achdou & Jiequn Han & Jean-Michel Lasry & Pierre-Louis Lions & Benjamin Moll, 2017. "Income and Wealth Distribution in Macroeconomics: A Continuous-Time Approach," NBER Working Papers 23732, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Sato, Ryuzo, 1981. "Theory of Technical Change and Economic Invariance," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780126194609 edited by Shell, Karl, December.
    4. J.J. Heckman & E.E. Leamer (ed.), 2007. "Handbook of Econometrics," Handbook of Econometrics, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 6, number 6b.
    5. Hansen, Lars Peter & Sargent, Thomas J., 1980. "Formulating and estimating dynamic linear rational expectations models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 7-46, May.
    6. Weil, Philippe, 1989. "The equity premium puzzle and the risk-free rate puzzle," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 401-421, November.
    7. Merton, Robert C., 1971. "Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 373-413, December.
    8. Yakar Kannai, 2005. "Remarks concerning concave utility functions on finite sets," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 26(2), pages 333-344, August.
    9. J.J. Heckman & E.E. Leamer (ed.), 2007. "Handbook of Econometrics," Handbook of Econometrics, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 6, number 6a.
    10. Yoram Halevy, 2015. "Time Consistency: Stationarity and Time Invariance," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83, pages 335-352, January.
    11. Kannai, Yakar, 2004. "When is individual demand concavifiable?," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-2), pages 59-69, February.
    12. Patrick Pintus, 2006. "Indeterminacy with almost constant returns to scale: capital-labor substitution matters," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 28(3), pages 633-649, August.
    13. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    14. Chen, An & Pelsser, Antoon & Vellekoop, Michel, 2011. "Modeling non-monotone risk aversion using SAHARA utility functions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(5), pages 2075-2092, September.
    15. Ryuzo Sato & Rama V. Ramachandran, 2014. "Symmetry and Economic Invariance," Advances in Japanese Business and Economics, Springer, edition 2, number 978-4-431-54430-2, September.
    16. Cass, David & Stiglitz, Joseph E., 1970. "The structure of investor preferences and asset returns, and separability in portfolio allocation: A contribution to the pure theory of mutual funds," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 122-160, June.
    17. Skiadas, Costis, 2013. "Scale-invariant uncertainty-averse preferences and source-dependent constant relative risk aversion," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(1), January.
    18. Lars Peter Hansen, 2014. "Nobel Lecture: Uncertainty Outside and Inside Economic Models," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 122(5), pages 945-987.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perets, Gadi S. & Yashiv, Eran, 2015. "The fundamental nature of HARA utility," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86287, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Gadi S. Perets & Eran Yashiv, 2015. "The Fundamental Nature of HARA Utility," Discussion Papers 1522, Centre for Macroeconomics (CFM).
    3. Hu Yingyao & Shum Matthew & Tan Wei & Xiao Ruli, 2017. "A Simple Estimator for Dynamic Models with Serially Correlated Unobservables," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Mark E. Wohar & David E. Rapach, 2005. "Return Predictability and the Implied Intertemporal Hedging Demands for Stocks and Bonds: International Evidence," Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 329, Society for Computational Economics.
    5. Matsen, Egil, 2003. "Habit persistence and welfare gains from international asset trade," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 239-260, April.
    6. Christensen, Peter Ove & Larsen, Kasper & Munk, Claus, 2012. "Equilibrium in securities markets with heterogeneous investors and unspanned income risk," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 147(3), pages 1035-1063.
    7. LuisM. Viceira & John Y. Campbell, 2001. "Who Should Buy Long-Term Bonds?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(1), pages 99-127, March.
    8. Huang, Hung-Hsi & Wang, Ching-Ping, 2013. "Portfolio selection and portfolio frontier with background risk," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 177-196.
    9. Merton, Robert, 1990. "Capital market theory and the pricing of financial securities," Handbook of Monetary Economics, in: B. M. Friedman & F. H. Hahn (ed.), Handbook of Monetary Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 11, pages 497-581, Elsevier.
    10. Blake, David & Cairns, Andrew & Dowd, Kevin, 2008. "Turning pension plans into pension planes: What investment strategy designers of defined contribution pension plans can learn from commercial aircraft designers," MPRA Paper 33749, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Aase, Knut K., 2015. "Life Insurance And Pension Contracts I: The Time Additive Life Cycle Model," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 1-47, January.
    12. John Y. Campbell, 2000. "Asset Pricing at the Millennium," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1515-1567, August.
    13. Chen, An & Vellekoop, Michel, 2017. "Optimal investment and consumption when allowing terminal debt," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 385-397.
    14. Gaowang Wang & Juanjuan Yan, 2016. "Robustness, the Spirit of Capitalism and Asset Pricing," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(4), pages 1892-1903.
    15. Smith, William T., 1999. "Risk, the Spirit of Capitalism and Growth: The Implications of a Preference for Capital," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 241-262, April.
    16. Chen Shou & Xiang Shengpeng & He Hongbo, 2019. "Do Time Preferences Matter in Intertemporal Consumption and Portfolio Decisions?," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 1-13, June.
    17. Aase, Knut K., 2014. "The Life Cycle Model with Recursive Utility: New insights on optimal consumption," Discussion Papers 2014/19, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science, revised 16 Oct 2015.
    18. Munk, Claus, 2015. "Financial Asset Pricing Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198716457.
    19. Gregory Phelan & Alexis Akira Toda, 2015. "On the Robustness of Theoretical Asset Pricing Models," Department of Economics Working Papers 2015-10, Department of Economics, Williams College.
    20. Chen, An & Hieber, Peter & Nguyen, Thai, 2019. "Constrained non-concave utility maximization: An application to life insurance contracts with guarantees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1119-1135.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    consumption and portfolio choice; differential equations; economic optimization; Finance; HARA utility; invariance; Lie symmetries; Macroeconomics; Structural Econometrics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.