IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000092/004365.html

Incidencia del gasto en educación sobre los hogares en Bogotá en 2003

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Fernando Gamboa
  • Jos√© Alberto Guerra
  • Manuel Ram√≠rez G√≥mez

Abstract

Se evalúa el impacto redistributivo de las políticas educativas en Bogotá mediante elAnálisis de Incidencia del Beneficio. A pesar que los hogares son autónomos conrespecto a la elección entre la educación oficial y no oficial, la provisión pública de laeducación genera fuertes impactos progresivos en el ingreso que se explayan haciareducciones de pobreza y desigualdad, sin importar el cálculo del subsidio que seimpute al ingreso.************************************************************************************************************Applying Benefit Incidence Analysis we assessed the redistributive impact of publicpolicies concerned with education in Bogotá. Though the household choices aboutpublic or private schooling are decentralized and respond to market constraints, thepublic provision policy of education achieves strong progressive impacts on incomeimplying reductions both on poverty and inequality, no matter which calculation ofsubsidy is implemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Fernando Gamboa & Jos√© Alberto Guerra & Manuel Ram√≠rez G√≥mez, 2007. "Incidencia del gasto en educaci√≥n sobre los hogares en Bogot√° en 2003," Documentos de Trabajo 4365, Universidad del Rosario.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000092:004365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10336/11118/4365.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:15090 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Aaron, Henry & McGuire, Martin, 1970. "Public Goods and Income Distribution," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 38(6), pages 907-920, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wolfgang Buchholz & Wolfgang Peters, 2007. "Justifying the Lindahl solution as an outcome of fair cooperation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 157-169, October.
    2. Robert Scherf & Matthew Weinzierl, 2020. "Understanding Different Approaches to Benefit‐Based Taxation," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 385-410, June.
    3. Christos Koutsampelas & Panos Tsakloglou, 2011. "Short-run distributional effects of public education in Greece," University of Cyprus Working Papers in Economics 12-2011, University of Cyprus Department of Economics.
    4. Cristian F. Sepulveda, 2025. "“Public goods, labor supply and benefit taxation”," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 32(3), pages 872-894, June.
    5. Timothy Smeeding, 1984. "Approaches to Measuring and Valuing In-Kind Subsidies and the Distribution of Their Benefits," NBER Chapters, in: Economic Transfers in the United States, pages 139-176, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Cont, Walter & Porto, Alberto, 2014. "Personal and regional redistribution through public finance in a federal setting," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 563-578.
    7. Hines Jr., James R., 2000. "What is benefit taxation?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 483-492, March.
    8. Tabi Atemnkeng Johannes & Tafah Akwi & Peter Etoh Anzah, 2006. "The Distributive Impact of Fiscal Policy in Cameroon: Tax and Benefit Incidence," Working Papers PMMA 2006-16, PEP-PMMA.
    9. Haizhen Mou & Stanley L. Winer, 2015. "Fiscal Incidence When Family Structure Matters," Public Finance Review, , vol. 43(3), pages 373-401, May.
    10. Eskeland, Gunnar*Chingying Kong, 1998. "Protecting the environment and the poor - a public goods framework applied to Indonesia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1961, The World Bank.
    11. Richard D. Raymond & Michael Sesnowitz, 1980. "The Distributional Impact of Public Goods," Public Finance Review, , vol. 8(4), pages 397-426, October.
    12. Jasper N. Meya, 2018. "Environmental Inequality and Economic Valuation," Working Papers V-416-18, University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics, revised Dec 2018.
    13. Hulten, Charles R. & Schwab, Robert M., 1991. "A Haig-Simons-Tiebout Comprehensive Income Tax," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 44(1), pages 67-78, March.
    14. Hulten, Charles R. & Schwab, Robert M., 1991. "A Haig-Simons-Tiebout Comprehensive Income Tax," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 44(1), pages 67-78, March.
    15. Mawuli Gaddah & Alistair Munro & Peter Quartey, 2015. "The rich or the poor: who gains from public education spending in Ghana?," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(2), pages 112-131, February.
    16. Kaplow, Louis, 2006. "Public goods and the distribution of income," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(7), pages 1627-1660, October.
    17. Amedeo Spadaro & Lucia Mangiavacchi & Ignacio Moral-Arce & Marta Adiego-Estella & Angela Blanco-Moreno, 2013. "Evaluating the redistributive impact of public health expenditure using an insurance value approach," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(5), pages 775-787, October.
    18. Filip Palda, 2005. "Why Do Voters Demand Universal Government Benefits?," Public Economics 0503009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Mawuli Gaddah & Alistair Munro, 2011. "The Progressivity Of Health Care Services In Ghana," GRIPS Discussion Papers 11-14, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H52 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Education
    • H22 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Incidence
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000092:004365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Facultad de Economía (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferosco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.