IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cii/cepidt/2026-08.html

E-Commerce Provisions and Free Trade Agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Houssein Guimbard
  • Camilo Umana-Dajud

Abstract

Since 2001, 76 regional trade agreements (RTAs) have incorporated provisions on electronic commerce, representing 44% of all RTAs signed over the period. We build an original dataset identifying these agreements (which we call E-RTAs) using an algorithm that combines machine learning and text analysis to detect e-commerce provisions in 449 trade agreement texts. We document that E-RTAs are geographically concentrated among a handful of developed economies and that signatory pairs trade less and are farther apart than pairs linked by other RTAs. Using a gravity framework estimated via Poisson pseudomaximum likelihood (PPML), we find that E-RTAs increase trade by less than the average RTA: conditional on the standard RTA dummy, the E-RTA coefficient is -0.245, implying approximately 22 percent less trade. Neither the number of e-commerce provisions nor their legal bindingness affects this result. However, when we interact E-RTA status with a measure of the combined development level of the trading pair, the interaction coefficient is 0.134, and e-commerce provisions increase trade between sufficiently developed country pairs. These results are robust to alternative specifications, estimators, product-level disaggregation, services trade, and tariff controls.

Suggested Citation

  • Houssein Guimbard & Camilo Umana-Dajud, 2026. "E-Commerce Provisions and Free Trade Agreements," Working Papers 2026-08, CEPII research center.
  • Handle: RePEc:cii:cepidt:2026-08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2026/wp2026-08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Cipollina & Luca Salvatici, 2010. "Reciprocal Trade Agreements in Gravity Models: A Meta‐Analysis," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 63-80, February.
    2. Freund, Caroline L. & Weinhold, Diana, 2004. "The effect of the Internet on international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 171-189, January.
    3. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 170-192, March.
    4. Monteiro, José-Antonio & Teh, Robert, 2017. "Provisions on electronic commerce in regional trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2017-11, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    5. Gaulier, Guillaume & Zignago, Soledad, 2004. "Notes on BACI (analytical database of international trade). 1989-2002 version," MPRA Paper 32401, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Javier López González & Silvia Sorescu & Pinar Kaynak, 2023. "Of bytes and trade: Quantifying the impact of digitalisation on trade," OECD Trade Policy Papers 273, OECD Publishing.
    7. Weidner, Martin & Zylkin, Thomas, 2021. "Bias and consistency in three-way gravity models," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    8. Rauch, James E., 1999. "Networks versus markets in international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 7-35, June.
    9. Thierry Mayer & Hillel Rapoport & Camilo Umana-Dajud, 2025. "Free Trade Agreements and the movement of business people," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 93-126.
    10. Baier, Scott L. & Bergstrand, Jeffrey H., 2007. "Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 72-95, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paola Cardamone, 2007. "A Survey of the Assessments of the Effectiveness of Preferential Trade Agreements using Gravity Models," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 60(4), pages 421-473.
    2. Harald Oberhofer & Zhenyi Wang, 2026. "How Data Choices Shape Structural Gravity Estimates: Evidence from EU Membership," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp398, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
    3. Abeliansky, Ana L. & Hilbert, Martin, 2017. "Digital technology and international trade: Is it the quantity of subscriptions or the quality of data speed that matters?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 35-48.
    4. Clougherty, Joseph A. & Grajek, Michał, 2014. "International standards and international trade: Empirical evidence from ISO 9000 diffusion," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 70-82.
    5. Michele Imbruno & Joël Cariolle & Jaime de Melo, 2025. "Digital connectivity and firm participation in foreign markets: An exporter-based bilateral analysis," Post-Print hal-05570207, HAL.
    6. Harald Oberhofer & Zhenyi Wang, 2025. "Everything You Always Wanted to Know About EU Membership Trade Effects But Were Afraid to Ask," CESifo Working Paper Series 11823, CESifo.
    7. Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. & Larch, Mario & Yotov, Yoto V., 2015. "Economic integration agreements, border effects, and distance elasticities in the gravity equation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 307-327.
    8. Cosimo Beverelli & Martin T. Braml & Lionel Gérard Fontagné & Alexander Keck & Gianluca Orefice, 2022. "Heterogeneous Trade Effects of Pre-Shipment Inspections," CESifo Working Paper Series 9833, CESifo.
    9. Suárez-Varela, Marta & Rodríguez-Crespo, Ernesto, 2022. "Is dirty trade concentrating in more polluting countries? Evidence from Africa," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 728-744.
    10. Melitz, Jacques & Toubal, Farid, 2014. "Native language, spoken language, translation and trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 351-363.
    11. Kazunobu Hayakawa & Tadashi Ito & Fukunari Kimura, 2016. "Trade Creation Effects of Regional Trade Agreements: Tariff Reduction versus Non-tariff Barrier Removal," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 317-326, February.
    12. repec:edn:sirdps:417 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Hayakawa, Kazunobu & Yoshimi, Taiyo, 2016. "Gravity with multiple tariff schemes," IDE Discussion Papers 614, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    14. Jonathan Timmis, 2012. "The Internet and International Trade in Goods," Discussion Papers 12/08, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    15. Dutt, Pushan, 2020. "The WTO is not passé," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    16. Rindler, Michael, 2021. "Changing Language Skills and Trade in Europe," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242449, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    17. Herman, Peter R. & Oliver, Sarah, 2023. "Trade, policy, and economic development in the digital economy," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    18. Erick Kitenge & Sajal Lahiri, 2022. "Is the Internet bringing down language‐based barriers to international trade?," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 566-605, May.
    19. Thais Nunez Rocha & Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso & Chahir Zaki, 2024. "What Type of Trade is Promoted by Environmental Provisions in Trade Agreements?," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 156, pages 207-236.
    20. Jonathan Timmis, 2012. "The Internet and International Trade in Goods," Discussion Papers 12/03, University of Nottingham, School of Economics.
    21. Fabien Candau & Geoffroy Guepie & Reine Kouakou, 2018. "In Gravity no Veritas: Dubious Trade Elasticiy and Weak Effects of Regional Trade Agreements in Africa," Working Papers hal-02625930, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • L81 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Retail and Wholesale Trade; e-Commerce
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cii:cepidt:2026-08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepiifr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.