Psychological Aspect of Monitoring Accuracy in Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Drew Fudenberg & David Levine & Eric Maskin, 2008.
"The Folk Theorem With Imperfect Public Information,"
World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Drew Fudenberg & David K Levine (ed.), A Long-Run Collaboration On Long-Run Games, chapter 12, pages 231-273,
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
- Fudenberg, Drew & Levine, David I & Maskin, Eric, 1994. "The Folk Theorem with Imperfect Public Information," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(5), pages 997-1039, September.
- Fudenberg, D. & Levine, D.K. & Maskin, E., 1989. "The Folk Theorem With Inperfect Public Information," Working papers 523, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
- Drew Fudenberg & David K. Levine & Eric Maskin, 1994. "The Folk Theorem with Imperfect Public Information," Levine's Working Paper Archive 2058, David K. Levine.
- Drew Fudenberg & David K. Levine & Eric Maskin, 1994. "The Folk Theorem with Imperfect Public Information," Levine's Working Paper Archive 394, David K. Levine.
- Hitoshi Matsushima, 2004.
"Repeated Games with Private Monitoring: Two Players,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(3), pages 823-852, May.
- Hitoshi Matsushima, 2003. "Repeated Games with Private Monitoring: Two Players," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-242, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
- Charness, Gary & Rabin, Matthew, 2002. "Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt3d04q5sm, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Bhaskar, V. & Obara, Ichiro, 2002.
"Belief-Based Equilibria in the Repeated Prisoners' Dilemma with Private Monitoring,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 40-69, January.
- V. Bhaskar & Ichiro Obara, "undated". "Belief-Based Equilibria in the Repeated Prisoners' Dilemma with Private Monitoring," Penn CARESS Working Papers d93eb6f40c65728f9e1a7b114, Penn Economics Department.
- V. Bhaskar & Ichiro Obara, 2000. "Belief-Based Equilibria in the Repeated Prisoners' Dilemma with Private Monitoring," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1330, Econometric Society.
- Rabin, Matthew, 1993.
"Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(5), pages 1281-1302, December.
- Matthew Rabin., 1992. "Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics," Economics Working Papers 92-199, University of California at Berkeley.
- M. Rabin, 2001. "Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics," Levine's Working Paper Archive 511, David K. Levine.
- Guth, Werner & Schmittberger, Rolf & Schwarze, Bernd, 1982. "An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 367-388, December.
- Kayaba, Yutaka & Matsushima, Hitoshi & Toyama, Tomohisa, 2020.
"Accuracy and retaliation in repeated games with imperfect private monitoring: Experiments,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 193-208.
- Yutaka Kayaba & Hitoshi Matsushima & Tomohisa Toyama, 2018. "Accuracy and Retaliation in Repeated Games with Imperfect Private Monitoring: Experiments," CARF F-Series CARF-F-433, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
- Kayaba Yutaka & Hitoshi Matsushima & Tomohisa Toyama, 2019. "Accuracy and Retaliation in Repeated Games with Imperfect Private Monitoring: Experiments," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1125, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
- Charness, Gary & Rabin, Matthew, 2001. "Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt4qz9k8vg, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- John Duffy & Félix Muñoz-García, 2012.
"Patience or Fairness? Analyzing Social Preferences in Repeated Games,"
Games, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, March.
- John Duffy & Felix Munoz-Garcia, 2009. "Patience or Fairness? Analyzing Social Preferences in Repeated Games," Working Papers 2009-12, School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University.
- Ely, Jeffrey C. & Valimaki, Juuso, 2002.
"A Robust Folk Theorem for the Prisoner's Dilemma,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 84-105, January.
- Jeffrey C. Ely & Juuso Valimaki, 1999. "A Robust Folk Theorem for the Prisoner's Dilemma," Discussion Papers 1264, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
- Jeffrey Ely, 2000. "A Robust Folk Theorem for the Prisoners' Dilemma," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0210, Econometric Society.
- Charness, Gary B & Rabin, Matthew, 2001. "Understanding Social Preferences With Simple Tests," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series qt0dc3k4m5, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara.
- Gary Charness & Matthew Rabin, 2002.
"Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(3), pages 817-869.
- Gary Charness & Matthew Rabin, 2003. "Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests," General Economics and Teaching 0303002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Kayaba, Yutaka & Matsushima, Hitoshi & Toyama, Tomohisa, 2020.
"Accuracy and retaliation in repeated games with imperfect private monitoring: Experiments,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 193-208.
- Yutaka Kayaba & Hitoshi Matsushima & Tomohisa Toyama, 2018. "Accuracy and Retaliation in Repeated Games with Imperfect Private Monitoring: Experiments," CARF F-Series CARF-F-433, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
- Kayaba Yutaka & Hitoshi Matsushima & Tomohisa Toyama, 2019. "Accuracy and Retaliation in Repeated Games with Imperfect Private Monitoring: Experiments," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1125, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Matsushima Hitoshi, 2020.
"Behavioral Theory of Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma: Generous Tit-For-Tat Strategy,"
The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, January.
- Hitoshi Matsushima, 2019. "Behavioral Theory of Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Generous Tit-For-Tat Strategy," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1115, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
- Hitoshi Matsushima, 2019. "Behavioral Theory of Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma: Generous Tit-For-Tat Strategy (Forthcoming in the B. E. Journal of Theoretical Economics)," CARF F-Series CARF-F-452, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
- Hitoshi Matsushima & Tomomi Tanaka & Tomohisa Toyama, 2013.
"Behavioral Approach to Repeated Games with Private Monitoring,"
CIRJE F-Series
CIRJE-F-879, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
- Hitoshi Matsushima & Tomomi Tanaka & Tomohisa Toyama, 2013. "Behavioral Approach to Repeated Games with Private Monitoring," CARF F-Series CARF-F-309, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
- Anne Corcos & Yorgos Rizopoulos, 2011. "Is prosocial behavior egocentric? The “invisible hand” of emotions," Post-Print halshs-01968213, HAL.
- Christian Korth, 2009.
"Reciprocity—An Indirect Evolutionary Analysis,"
Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Fairness in Bargaining and Markets, chapter 0, pages 35-55,
Springer.
- Siegfried Berninghaus & Christian Korth & Stefan Napel, 2007. "Reciprocity—an indirect evolutionary analysis," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 579-603, October.
- Berninghaus, Siegfried K. & Korth, Christian & Napel, Stefan, 2003. "Reciprocity - an indirect evolutionary analysis," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 03-32, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
- Berninghaus, Siegfried & Korth, Christian & Napel, Stefan, 2003. "Reciprocity : an indirect evolutionary analysis," Papers 03-32, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
- Andrea Essl & Frauke von Bieberstein & Michael Kosfeld & Markus Kröll, 2018.
"Sales Performance and Social Preferences,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
7030, CESifo.
- Kosfeld, Michael & Essl, Andrea & Von Bieberstein, Frauke & Kröll, Markus, 2018. "Sales Performance and Social Preferences," CEPR Discussion Papers 12904, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Essl, Andrea & von Bieberstein, Frauke & Kosfeld, Michael & Kröll, Markus, 2018. "Sales Performance and Social Preferences," IZA Discussion Papers 11505, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Thorsten Chmura & Christoph Engel & Markus Englerth, 2013. "Selfishness As a Potential Cause of Crime. A Prison Experiment," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2013_05, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
- Larney, Andrea & Rotella, Amanda & Barclay, Pat, 2019. "Stake size effects in ultimatum game and dictator game offers: A meta-analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 61-72.
- Barmettler, Franziska & Fehr, Ernst & Zehnder, Christian, 2012.
"Big experimenter is watching you! Anonymity and prosocial behavior in the laboratory,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 17-34.
- Franziska Barmettler & Ernst Fehr & Christian Zehnder, 2011. "Big experimenter is watching you! Anonymity and prosocial behavior in the laboratory," ECON - Working Papers 027, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
- Barmettler, Franziska & Fehr, Ernst & Zehnder, Christian, 2011. "Big Experimenter Is Watching You! Anonymity and Prosocial Behavior in the Laboratory," IZA Discussion Papers 5925, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Leibbrandt, Andreas & López-Pérez, Raúl, 2012. "An exploration of third and second party punishment in ten simple games," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 753-766.
- Güth, Werner & Kocher, Martin G., 2014.
"More than thirty years of ultimatum bargaining experiments: Motives, variations, and a survey of the recent literature,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 396-409.
- Werner Güth & Martin G. Kocher, 2013. "More than Thirty Years of Ultimatum Bargaining Experiments: Motives, Variations, and a Survey of the Recent Literature," CESifo Working Paper Series 4380, CESifo.
- Werner Güth & Martin G. Kocher, 2013. "More than thirty years of ultimatum bargaining experiments: Motives, variations, and a survey of the recent literature," Jena Economics Research Papers 2013-035, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
- Andreas Leibbrandt, 2012.
"Are social preferences related to market performance?,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 15(4), pages 589-603, December.
- Andreas Leibbrandt, 2011. "Are Social Preference Related to Market Perfomance," Artefactual Field Experiments 00582, The Field Experiments Website.
- Bart J. Wilson, 2012.
"Contra Private Fairness,"
American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 407-435, April.
- Bart J. Wilson, 2008. "Contra Private Fairness," Working Papers 08-04, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Bogliacino, Francesco & Codagnone, Cristiano, 2021.
"Microfoundations, behaviour, and evolution: Evidence from experiments,"
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 372-385.
- Bogliacino, Francesco & Codagnone, Cristiano, 2017. "Microfoundations, Behaviour, and Evolution: Evidence from Experiments," MPRA Paper 82479, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Gueye, Mamadou & Quérou, Nicolas & Soubeyran, Raphael, 2020.
"Social preferences and coordination: An experiment,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 26-54.
- Mamadou Gueye & Nicolas Querou & Raphael Soubeyran, 2020. "Social preferences and coordination: An experiment," Post-Print hal-02507100, HAL.
- Nicklisch, Andreas & Wolff, Irenaeus, 2012.
"On the nature of reciprocity: Evidence from the ultimatum reciprocity measure,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 892-905.
- Andreas Nicklisch & Irenaeus Wolff, 2011. "On the Nature of Reciprocity: Evidence from the Ultimatum Reciprocity Measure," TWI Research Paper Series 65, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
- Andreas Nicklisch & Irenaeus Wolff, 2012. "On the Nature of Reciprocity: Evidence from the Ultimatum Reciprocity Measure," Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz 2012-27, Department of Economics, University of Konstanz.
- Andreas Nicklisch & Irenaeus Wolff, 2012. "On the Nature of Reciprocity: Evidence from the Ultimatum Reciprocity Measure," TWI Research Paper Series 79, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
- Aina, Chiara & Battigalli, Pierpaolo & Gamba, Astrid, 2020.
"Frustration and anger in the Ultimatum Game: An experiment,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 150-167.
- Chiara Aina & Pierpaolo Battigalli & Astrid Gamba, 2018. "Frustration and Anger in the Ultimatum Game: An Experiment," Working Papers 621, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
- Charness, Gary & Cobo-Reyes, Ramón & Jiménez, Natalia, 2008.
"An investment game with third-party intervention,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 18-28, October.
- Gary Charness & Ramón Cobo-Reyes & Natalia Jiménez, 2006. "An investment game with third-party intervention," ThE Papers 06/13, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
- Romina Boarini & Jean-François Laslier & Stéphane Robin, 2009.
"Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 341-373, October.
- Romina Boarini & Jean-François Laslier & Stéphane Robin, 2004. "Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining : Evidence from a transcontinental Ultimatum Game," Working Papers hal-00242919, HAL.
- Romina Boarini & Jean-François Laslier & Stéphane Robin, 2006. "Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility in Bargaining: Evidence from a Transcontinental Ultimatum Game," Working Papers halshs-00104668, HAL.
- Romina Boarini & Jean-François Laslier & Stéphane Robin, 2009. "Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility in Bargaining : Evidence from a Transcontinental Ultimatum Game," Post-Print halshs-00435110, HAL.
- Romina Boarini & Jean-François Laslier & Stéphane Robin, 2009. "Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game," Post-Print halshs-00451566, HAL.
- Romina Boarini & Jean-François Laslier & Stéphane Robin, 2009. "Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game," SciencePo Working papers Main halshs-00451566, HAL.
- Romina Boarini & Jean-François Laslier & Stéphane Robin, 2009. "Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility in Bargaining : Evidence from a Transcontinental Ultimatum Game," SciencePo Working papers Main halshs-00435110, HAL.
- Erik O. Kimbrough & Alexander Vostroknutov, 2016.
"Norms Make Preferences Social,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 608-638, June.
- Erik O. Kimbrough & Alexander Vostroknutov, 2016. "Norms Make Preferences Social," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 608-638.
- Erik O. Kimbrough & Alexander Vostroknutov, 2013. "Norms Make Preferences Social," Discussion Papers dp13-01, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
- Erik Kimbrough & Alexander Vostroknutov, 2014. "Norms Make Preferences Social," Discussion Papers dp14-06, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
More about this item
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-CBE-2018-09-03 (Cognitive and Behavioural Economics)
- NEP-EXP-2018-09-03 (Experimental Economics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cfi:fseres:cf432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/catokjp.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.
Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cfi/fseres/cf432.html