IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_12679.html

Expenditure Cuts vs. Tax Hikes: Economic Effects of Municipal Consolidation Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Zohal Hessami
  • Maximilian Thomas
  • Georg U. Thunecke

Abstract

This paper investigates the short- and medium-term causal impact of austerity on local fiscal, economic, and political outcomes. We exploit a 2013 state-level austerity program in Hesse, Germany and manually code 2,900 consolidation measures for 86 municipalities, distinguishing between tax- and expenditure-based strategies. Using synthetic difference-in-differences (SDID) estimations, we compare treated municipalities to a control group of 4,630 municipalities in states without an austerity program. Overall, treated municipalities consolidate through tax hikes (business +12%, property +65%) and expenditure cuts (personnel -6%, investments -62%). Austerity generally stabilizes municipal finances but hurts labor markets (number of firms -13% , salaries -9% , jobs -6%). Economic costs vary across consolidation strategies: tax-based consolidation reduces business tax bases and employment, while expenditure-based consolidation depresses apartment rents. Political costs arise only when consolidation relies heavily on a single instrument.

Suggested Citation

  • Zohal Hessami & Maximilian Thomas & Georg U. Thunecke, 2026. "Expenditure Cuts vs. Tax Hikes: Economic Effects of Municipal Consolidation Strategies," CESifo Working Paper Series 12679, CESifo.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12679.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H39 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Other
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • H81 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Governmental Loans; Loan Guarantees; Credits; Grants; Bailouts
    • R51 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Finance in Urban and Rural Economies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.