IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_12481.html

How Absolute and Relative Payoffs Shape Dishonesty

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Necker

  • Benoit Le Maux

Abstract

We examine how absolute and relative gains within reward schemes influence dishonesty. In our online experiment, we vary two payoff dimensions in a cheating mind game: the payoff level and the absolute payoff difference between being successful or not. A higher payoff level has a negative impact on dishonesty, while a greater absolute payoff difference has a positive impact. Variations in these dimensions also affect the relative payoff difference: we observe the largest decrease in dishonesty when moving from the highest to the lowest relative gain. A potential implication is that reward schemes with a reasonable amount from low performance and a relatively small bonus from high performance are least prone to cheating, and this can be achieved in a cost-neutral way.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Necker & Benoit Le Maux, 2026. "How Absolute and Relative Payoffs Shape Dishonesty," CESifo Working Paper Series 12481, CESifo.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12481.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • C92 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Group Behavior
    • M52 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Compensation and Compensation Methods and Their Effects
    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy
    • J33 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Compensation Packages; Payment Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.