IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_12040.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Foreclosure Incentives with Network Effects: A Framework for Screening Digital Mergers

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Johnen
  • Shiva Shekhar

Abstract

This paper proposes a simple yet useful framework for evaluating vertical mergers in digital markets by distinguishing between product-specific and ecosystem-specific network effects. Vis-a-vis no network effects, product-specific network effects amplify foreclosure and steering incentives, as a rival’s growth directly undermines the platform’s product value. Conversely, ecosystem-specific effects dampen foreclosure incentives, since rivals contribute to the overall value of the platform ecosystem. We develop a formal model illustrating how this distinction shapes platform behavior and competitive outcomes. We apply this distinction to real-world examples to illustrate its potential usefulness. Our distinction implies that regulators may want to adopt a stricter standard with no presumption of efficiencies where product-specific effects dominate. In contrast, when ecosystem-specific effects prevail, merger evaluation should mirror traditional vertical merger analysis. Thus, offering a more nuanced approach to merger evaluation by presenting a practical screening tool to identify problematic vertical mergers in markets featuring network effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Johnen & Shiva Shekhar, 2025. "Foreclosure Incentives with Network Effects: A Framework for Screening Digital Mergers," CESifo Working Paper Series 12040, CESifo.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12040.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johannes Boehm & Jan Sonntag, 2023. "Vertical Integration and Foreclosure: Evidence from Production Network Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 141-161, January.
    2. Andrei Hagiu & Tat‐How Teh & Julian Wright, 2022. "Should platforms be allowed to sell on their own marketplaces?," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(2), pages 297-327, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dirk Bergemann & Alessandro Bonatti, 2024. "Data, Competition, and Digital Platforms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(8), pages 2553-2595, August.
    2. Chacha, Peter Wankuru & Kirui, Benard Kipyegon & Wiedemann, Verena, 2024. "Supply Chains in Times of Crisis: Evidence from Kenya’s Production Network," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Martin Peitz & Anton Sobolev, 2024. "Product Recommendations and Price Parity Clauses," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_595, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    4. Christopher Ksoll & Rocco Macchiavello & Ameet Morjaria, 2023. "Electoral Violence and Supply Chain Disruptions in Kenya's Floriculture Industry," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(6), pages 1335-1351, November.
    5. Zennyo, Yusuke, 2024. "A model of mobile app and ad platform markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Luca Sandrini & Robert Somogyi, 2022. "News Media Bargaining Codes," Working Papers 22-06, NET Institute.
    7. D’Annunzio, Anna & Russo, Antonio, 2024. "Platform Transaction Fees and Freemium Pricing," TSE Working Papers 24-1569, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    8. Dipankar Das, 2023. "A Model of Competitive Assortment Planning Algorithm," Papers 2307.09479, arXiv.org.
    9. Etro, Federico, 2023. "Platform competition with free entry of sellers," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Shota Ichihashi & Alex Smolin, 2023. "Buyer-Optimal Algorithmic Recommendations," Papers 2309.12122, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    11. Martin Peitz, 2024. "The Economic Theory of Two-Sided Platforms," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_584, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    12. Bacilieri, Andrea & Astudillo-Estévez, Pablo, 2023. "Reconstructing firm-level input-output networks from partial information," INET Oxford Working Papers 2023-05, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, revised Jan 2025.
    13. Tan, Yinliang (Ricky) & Yu, Chuanbin & Liu, Yang & Zheng, Quan, 2024. "Agency models in online platforms: A review of recent developments and future prospects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(3), pages 679-695.
    14. Shopova, Radostina, 2023. "Private labels in marketplaces," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    15. Junbao Li & Chengying He & Zhanzhong Shi, 2025. "Platform search design with heterogeneous consumers," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Muthers Johannes & Wismer Sebastian, 2022. "Why Do Platforms Charge Proportional Fees? Commitment and Seller Participation," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 21(2), pages 83-110, August.
    17. Doh-Shin Jeon & Yassine Lefouili & Leonardo Madio, 2021. "Platform Liability and Innovation," Working Papers 21-05, NET Institute.
    18. Yuchen Luo & Lingfang (Ivy) Li & Xiao Fu, 2025. "Within‐Firm and Cross‐Firm Interconnection Strategies in Asymmetric Networks," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(4), pages 2269-2288, June.
    19. Wang, Yinghuan & Zhang, Jingjing & Yan, Yan & Guan, Jiancheng, 2024. "The bidirectional causality of tie stability and innovation performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(10).
    20. Zhong, Qinjia & Wang, Jianjun & Zou, Zongbao & Lai, Xiaofan, 2023. "The incentives for information sharing in online retail platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.