IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ceo/wpaper/47.html

Les "bien publics" et la Politique Agricole Commune : vers un tournant vert ? / Public goods and the Common Agricultural Policy: towards a green change ?

Author

Listed:
  • François-Gaël Lataste
  • Aurélie Trouvé
  • Marielle Berriet-Solliec
  • Janet Dwyer

Abstract

- De nombreux débats ont mis en lumière l'ambiguïté de la notion de « biens publics ». Nous proposons d'éclairer ces débats à partir du cas de la Politique agricole commune (PAC). Nous faisons l'hypothèse que l'utilisation de la notion de « biens publics » dans le débat sur la PAC, tout en mettant l'accent sur les effets environnementaux, conforte la remise en cause de la PAC en tant que politique commune de régulation des marchés qui concerne des objectifs multiples. Pour tester cette hypothèse, nous nous appuyons sur une revue de la littérature économique, ainsi que sur une analyse des prises de position d'acteurs institutionnels (rencontrés à Bruxelles et au Royaume-Uni). - Numerous debates reveal the ambiguity surrounding the concept of "public goods". We seek to examine and clarify these in the particular case of Europe's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Our hypothesis is that the use of the concept of ?public goods' in the debate on the CAP and its role, whilst emphasizing environmental issues, actually calls into question the notion of the CAP as a common policy with multiple objectives also embracing market regulation, cohesion and quality of life. To test this hypothesis, we review the economic literature and make an analysis of the perspectives and stand-points of institutional actors in Brussels and the United Kingdom.

Suggested Citation

  • François-Gaël Lataste & Aurélie Trouvé & Marielle Berriet-Solliec & Janet Dwyer, 2014. "Les "bien publics" et la Politique Agricole Commune : vers un tournant vert ? / Public goods and the Common Agricultural Policy: towards a green change ?," INRA UMR CESAER Working Papers 2014/1, INRA UMR CESAER, Centre d'’Economie et Sociologie appliquées à l'’Agriculture et aux Espaces Ruraux.
    • Handle: RePEc:ceo:wpaper:47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www2.dijon.inra.fr/cesaer/workingpapers/RePEc/ceo/wpaper/wp2014_1.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coase, R H, 1974. "The Lighthouse in Economics," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(2), pages 357-376, October.
    2. Albert Massot-Marti, 2003. "Le paradigme multifonctionnel : outil et arme dans la renégociation de la PAC," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 273(1), pages 30-44.
    3. Petrick, Martin, 2008. "The co-evolution semantics and policy paradigms: 50 years of Europe's common agricultural policy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 43(4), pages 246-252.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. François Lataste & Aurélie Trouvé & Marielle Berriet-Solliec & Janet Dwyer, 2015. "La notion de « biens publics » au secours de la Politique Agricole Commune ?," Post-Print hal-01151920, HAL.
    2. Heatley, David, 2011. "Auckland Transport: Institutional Congestion?," Working Paper Series 4080, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    3. JOHN McMILLAN, 1979. "The Free‐Rider Problem: A Survey," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 55(2), pages 95-107, June.
    4. Dan Bogart & Gary Richardson, 2011. "Property Rights and Parliament in Industrializing Britain," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(2), pages 241-274.
    5. Michael Fotos, 2015. "Vincent Ostrom’s revolutionary science of association," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 67-83, April.
    6. Mark Koyama, 2014. "The law & economics of private prosecutions in industrial revolution England," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 277-298, April.
    7. Wang Ning, 2018. "Law and the Economy: An Introduction to Coasian Law and Economics," Man and the Economy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Button, Kenneth & Thibault, Marc, 2005. "The Political Economy Of Maritime Container Security," 46th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Washington, D.C., March 6-8, 2005 208148, Transportation Research Forum.
    9. Dulong de Rosnay, Mélanie & Stalder, Felix, 2020. "Digital commons," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-22.
    10. Laurent Linnemer, 2012. "Compte rendu d'ouvrage -La société des inconnus : Histoire naturelle de la collectivité humaine," Post-Print hal-00939396, HAL.
    11. Gérard Grellet & Naîma Grellet, 1999. "Développement des marchés et coûts de transaction. Une critique des politiques économiques libérales," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(157), pages 37-49.
    12. Harold Mulherin, J., 2007. "Measuring the costs and benefits of regulation: Conceptual issues in securities markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(2-3), pages 421-437, June.
    13. Gunnthorsdottir, Anna & Houser, Daniel & McCabe, Kevin, 2007. "Disposition, history and contributions in public goods experiments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 304-315, February.
    14. Martin Petrick, 2013. "Reversing the rural race to the bottom: an evolutionary model of neo-endogenous rural development," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 40(4), pages 707-735, September.
    15. Daniel Sutter, 2009. "The Market, the Firm, and the Economics Profession," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(5), pages 1041-1061, November.
    16. Valentiny, Pál, 2018. "Coase-kép másképp: középpontban a közszolgáltatások [Coase otherwise: Public utilities]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 346-381.
    17. Andrei Shleifer, 1998. "State versus Private Ownership," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 133-150, Fall.
    18. David Blandford, 2010. "Presidential Address: The Visible or Invisible Hand? The Balance Between Markets and Regulation in Agricultural Policy," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 459-479, September.
    19. Rosolino A. Candela & Vincent J. Geloso, 2020. "The Lighthouse Debate and the Dynamics of Interventionism," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 289-314, September.
    20. Zawojska, Aldona, "undated". "Homo Agricola considered as Homo Economicus and Homo Politicus," 2010 IAMO Forum, June 16-18, 2010, Halle (Saale), Germany 90835, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ceo:wpaper:47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Corinne DASEN The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Corinne DASEN to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceinrfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.