IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt78t5j0x1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Using Sense of Place to Model Behavioral Choices

Author

Listed:
  • Deutsch, Kathleen E
  • Yoon, Seo Youn
  • Goulias, Konstadinos G.

Abstract

With the introduction and increasing reliance on the activity based approach in travel demand analysis and forecasting, discrete choice methods are more often in spatial contexts (e.g., residential location, job location, destination/activity choice). A necessity in specifying spatial choice models is the inclusion of the alternatives decision makers consider, and a realistic inclusion in the specification of the attributes of these alternatives, the characteristics of the decision making context, and the relevant characteristics of the decision maker. These details describe differences that exist among choices and individuals making choices. In the case of travel behavior, attributes of the alternatives have traditionally included attributes such as cost, distance, time, level of service and opportunities. Researchers however have recognized the benefit of attitudes in the estimation of choice models, showing improvement in explanatory power with the inclusion of attitudinal attributes of the individual. There is still however a vast expanse of unexplored attitudinal attributes in choice modeling. Particularly lacking in choice modeling is a strong theoretical underpinning of attitude formation and attitude relation to choice. Theorists in geography in the mid to late 1970s recognized and developed one such theory regarding the emotional and attitudinal association that people have with places. This became known as the theory of sense of place, which is the “affective ties with the material environment†(Tuan, 1974). This theory presents great potential in furthering the descriptive power of choice models, particularly destination choice. However, challenges abound, as this theory is rich in development, but poor in computational operationalization. In addition, everyday activity locations have not been adequately explored in sense of place quantification. In this paper, an overview of developments in discrete choice methods is presented, followed by a discussion of sense of place. Current and future work is discussed and benefits to choice modeling are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Deutsch, Kathleen E & Yoon, Seo Youn & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2011. "Using Sense of Place to Model Behavioral Choices," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt78t5j0x1, University of California Transportation Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt78t5j0x1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/78t5j0x1.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon, Herbert A, 1978. "Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 68(2), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Deutsch, Kate & Goulias, Konstadinos, 2009. "Investigating the Impact of Sense of Place on Travel Behavior Using an Intercept Survey Methodology," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3j95p0k4, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Swait, Joffre, 2001. "Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 643-666, August.
    4. Swait, Joffre & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 1987. "Incorporating random constraints in discrete models of choice set generation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 91-102, April.
    5. Dong, Xiaojing & Ben-Akiva, Moshe E. & Bowman, John L. & Walker, Joan L., 2006. "Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 163-180, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt78t5j0x1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lisa Schiff). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.