IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt347789n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

California Housing Trends: Implications for Transportation Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Shirgaokar, Manish
  • Deakin, Elizabeth

Abstract

A broad range of population forecasts and historic trends indicate that significant growth is on the horizon for California. Although population growth by geographic regions, racial/ethic groups, and age will vary, growth is a consistent trend. Naturally, growth in population implies growth in households and demand for housing units. It is imperative that any evaluation of regional growth trends to aid transportation infrastructure planning must look at housing patterns to grasp the complete picture.

Suggested Citation

  • Shirgaokar, Manish & Deakin, Elizabeth, 2001. "California Housing Trends: Implications for Transportation Planning," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt347789n8, University of California Transportation Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt347789n8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/347789n8.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steiner, Ruth L., 1998. "Traditional Shopping Centers," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5c82t0dh, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Cervero, Robert, 1994. "Transit-based housing in California: evidence on ridership impacts," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 174-183, June.
    3. Salomon, Ilan & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 1997. "Why Don't You Telecommute?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0z47k3jj, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Kirshner, Edward & Bigelow, Jennifer & Codina, Rick & Conover, Nancy, 1992. "California'S Lower-Income Housing Cooperatives," Research Reports 140052, University of California, Davis, Center for Cooperatives.
    5. Cervero, Robert & Menotti, Val, 1994. "Market Profiles of Rail-Based Housing Projects in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt89k664kz, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deakin, Elizabeth & Thomas, John & Ferrell, Christopher & Wei, Kai & Shirgaokar, Manish & Kim, Songju & Mason, Jonathan & Scott, Lilia & Sood, Vikrant, 2001. "Overview and Summary: Twelve Trends for Consideration in California's Transportation Plan," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7v74f6bq, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Deakin, Elizabeth & Thomas, John & Ferrell, Christopher & Wei, Kai & Shirgaokar, Manish & Kim, Songju & Mason, Jonathan & Scott, Lilia & Sood, Vikrant, 2001. "Twelve Trends for Consideration in California's Transportation Plan," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt29r3w4r6, University of California Transportation Center.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shirgaokar, Manish & Deakin, Elizabeth, 2001. "California Housing Trends: Implications for Transportation Planning," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5q87h87h, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Cervero, Robert, 1996. "Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 361-377, September.
    3. Marlon G. Boarnet & Sharon Sarmiento, 1998. "Can Land-use Policy Really Affect Travel Behaviour? A Study of the Link between Non-work Travel and Land-use Characteristics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(7), pages 1155-1169, June.
    4. Jianxi Feng & Martin Dijst & Bart Wissink & Jan Prillwitz, 2014. "Understanding Mode Choice in the Chinese Context: The Case of Nanjing Metropolitan Area," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(3), pages 315-330, July.
    5. Chakrabarti, Sandip, 2017. "How can public transit get people out of their cars? An analysis of transit mode choice for commute trips in Los Angeles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 80-89.
    6. Santoso, Djoen San & Yajima, Masaru & Sakamoto, Kunihiro & Kubota, Hisashi, 2012. "Opportunities and strategies for increasing bus ridership in rural Japan: A case study of Hidaka City," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 320-329.
    7. Nuworsoo, Cornelius Kofi, 2004. "Deep Discount Group Pass Programs as Instruments for Increasing Transit Revenue and Ridership," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7463z622, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Rodier, Caroline J, 2000. "Uncertainty in Travel and Emissions Models: A Case Study in the Sacramento Region," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7cg7f9dd, University of California Transportation Center.
    9. Michael Wegener & Franz Fuerst, 2004. "Land-Use Transport Interaction: State of the Art," Urban/Regional 0409005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Shaheen, Susan & Rodier, Caroline J. & Finson, Rachel S., 2003. "University of California, Davis Long-Range Development Plan: A Davis Smart Mobility Model," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt42k1d96f, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    11. Guerra, Erick & Cervero, Robert & Tischler, Daniel, 2011. "The Half-Mile Circle: Does It Represent Transit Station Catchments?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0d84c2f4, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Cynthia Chen & Hongmian Gong & Robert Paaswell, 2008. "Role of the built environment on mode choice decisions: additional evidence on the impact of density," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 285-299, May.
    13. Bo Wan & Xudan Zhao & Yuhan Sun & Tao Yang, 2023. "Unraveling the Impact of Spatial Configuration on TOD Function Mix Use and Spatial Intensity: An Analysis of 47 Morning Top-Flow Stations in Beijing (2018–2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    14. Qing Su, 2017. "Travel Demand Management Policy Instruments, Urban Spatial Characteristics, and Household Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Travel in the US Urban Areas," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 157-166.
    15. Nasri, Arefeh & Zhang, Lei, 2014. "The analysis of transit-oriented development (TOD) in Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan areas," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 172-179.
    16. Cervero, Robert & Guerra, Erick, 2011. "Urban Densities and Transit: A Multi-dimensional Perspective," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3mb598qr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    17. Pierre Filion & Kathleen McSpurren & Brad Appleby, 2006. "Wasted Density? The Impact of Toronto's Residential-Density-Distribution Policies on Public-Transit Use and Walking," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(7), pages 1367-1392, July.
    18. Zhu, Yi & Diao, Mi, 2016. "The impacts of urban mass rapid transit lines on the density and mobility of high-income households: A case study of Singapore," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 70-80.
    19. Guerra, Erick & Cervero, Robert & Tischler, Daniel, 2011. "The Half-Mile Circle: Does It Best Represent Transit Station Catchments?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9jd6r1t9, University of California Transportation Center.
    20. L. Sravya Jayanthi & Srinivas S. Pulugurtha & Raunak Mishra, 2023. "Examining the association between bus transit reliability and the number of boarding passengers," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 675-696, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt347789n8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.