IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt9863j1fz.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exploring Microtransit Adoption and its Impacts on Transportation Access for Underserved Populations

Author

Listed:
  • Xing, Yan
  • Pike, Susan
  • Waechter, Maxwell
  • DeLeon, Graham
  • Lipatova, Liubov
  • Handy, Susan
  • Wang, Yunshi

Abstract

Transportation-disadvantaged populations often face significant challenges in meeting their basic travel needs. Microtransit, a technology-enabled transit mobility solution, has the potential to address these issues by providing on-demand, affordable, and flexible services with multi-passenger vehicles. The ways in which microtransit supports underserved populations and the factors influencing its adoption are not well-studied, however. This research examines SmaRT Ride, a microtransit pilot program in the Sacramento, California, area operated by Sacramento Regional Transit. The project evaluates a broad range of factors influencing microtransit adoption and travel behavior among underserved populations using original revealed choice survey data collected from February – May 2024 with online and intercept surveys. A descriptive analysis revealed that SmaRT Ride has improved transportation access for these communities, complements the transit system by connecting fixed-route transit, and offers a cost-effective alternative to other transportation modes. A binary logistic regression was employed to explore differences between microtransit users and non-users with microtransit awareness. The results indicate that homeownership, employment status, frequency of public transit service use, and attitude towards transit significantly affect microtransit use. Homeowners are more likely to use microtransit, while households without employed members are less likely. In contrast, part-time employees show a higher inclination to use microtransit. Regular public transit users are also more likely to incorporate microtransit into their routines, with a positive attitude toward public transit further increasing the likelihood of its use. The nuanced understanding of microtransit adoption presented here can inform targeted strategies to promote its use among transportation-disadvantaged groups. The results suggest that integrating microtransit with existing transit, outreach programs, discounted or free access, extended service hours, and supporting homeownership and affordable housing in transit-rich areas can encourage microtransit adoption by low-income and/or underserved individuals. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Xing, Yan & Pike, Susan & Waechter, Maxwell & DeLeon, Graham & Lipatova, Liubov & Handy, Susan & Wang, Yunshi, 2024. "Exploring Microtransit Adoption and its Impacts on Transportation Access for Underserved Populations," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9863j1fz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt9863j1fz
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9863j1fz.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xing, Yan & Pike, Susan & Pourrahmani, Elham & Handy, Susan & Wang, Yunshi, 2022. "Exploring the Consumer Market of Microtransit Services in the Sacramento Area, California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt55g4800k, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Rossetti, Tomás & Broaddus, Andrea & Ruhl, Melissa & Daziano, Ricardo, 2023. "Commuter preferences for a first-mile/last-mile microtransit service in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Miah, Md Mintu & Naz, Farah & Hyun, Kate (Kyung) & Mattingly, Stephen P. & Cronley, Courtney & Fields, Noelle, 2020. "Barriers and opportunities for paratransit users to adopt on-demand micro transit," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Daniel McFadden, 1977. "Quantitative Methods for Analyzing Travel Behaviour of Individuals: Some Recent Developments," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 474, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    5. Pike, Susan PhD & Kazemian, Sara, 2020. "Influential Factors in the Formation of Partnerships Between Ridehail Companies and Public Transportation," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1xc697xk, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    6. Franco, Patrizia & Johnston, Ryan & McCormick, Ecaterina, 2020. "Demand responsive transport: Generation of activity patterns from mobile phone network data to support the operation of new mobility services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 244-266.
    7. Oded Cats & Rafal Kucharski & Santosh Rao Danda & Menno Yap, 2022. "Beyond the dichotomy: How ride-hailing competes with and complements public transport," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing, Yan & Pike, Susan & Pourrahmani, Elham & Handy, Susan & Wang, Yunshi, 2022. "Exploring the Consumer Market of Microtransit Services in the Sacramento Area, California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt55g4800k, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Carrel, Andre L. & Mavrouli, Stavroula M. & Natarajan, Priyamvada R. & Tarabay, Rana & Broaddus, Andrea, 2024. "Greening the commute: A case study of demand for employer-sponsored microtransit," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Shixingyue Hu & Yazao Yang, 2024. "Safety of female ride-hailing passengers: Perception and prevention," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Ahmad Adeel & Bruno Notteboom & Ansar Yasar & Kris Scheerlinck & Jeroen Stevens, 2021. "Sustainable Streetscape and Built Environment Designs around BRT Stations: A Stated Choice Experiment Using 3D Visualizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Andrew Copus & Dimitris Skuras & Kyriaki Tsegenidi, 2006. "Innovation and Peripherality: A Comparative Study in Six EU Member Countries," ERSA conference papers ersa06p295, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Mark C Mainwaring & Jenő Nagy & Mark E Hauber, 2021. "Sex-specific contributions to nest building in birds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1075-1085.
    7. Liu, Luyu & Kar, Armita & Tokey, Ahmad Ilderim & Le, Huyen T.K. & Miller, Harvey J., 2023. "Disparities in public transit accessibility and usage by people with mobility disabilities: An evaluation using high-resolution transit data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    8. Lahiri, Kajal & Gao, Jian, 2002. "Bayesian analysis of nested logit model by Markov chain Monte Carlo," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 103-133, November.
    9. Jonathan Darkwah Baffoe & Takeshi Mizunoya & Helmut Yabar, 2021. "Determinants of Rice Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Conservation and Sustainable Use of Swampy Wetlands in Ghana’s Northern and Ashanti Regions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Giorgia Pregnolato & Daniele Rimini & Francesca Baldan & Lorenza Maistrello & Silvia Salvalaggio & Nicolò Celadon & Paolo Ariano & Candido Fabrizio Pirri & Andrea Turolla, 2023. "Clinical Features to Predict the Use of a sEMG Wearable Device (REMO ® ) for Hand Motor Training of Stroke Patients: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, March.
    11. George Planiteros, 2022. "Reverse matching for ex-ante policy evaluation," DEOS Working Papers 2206, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    12. Jorge de Andres-Sanchez & Ala Ali Almahameed & Mario Arias-Oliva & Jorge Pelegrin-Borondo, 2022. "Correlational and Configurational Analysis of Factors Influencing Potential Patients’ Attitudes toward Surgical Robots: A Study in the Jordan University Community," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Attila Lindner & Balazs Murakozy & Balazs Reizer & Ragnhild Schreiner, 2022. "Firm-level technological change and skill demand," CEP Discussion Papers dp1857, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    14. Arnaud Dupuy & Alfred Galichon & Sonia Jaffe & Scott Duke Kominers, 2020. "Taxation In Matching Markets," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 61(4), pages 1591-1634, November.
    15. Nicolò Russo & Rory McGee & Mariacristina De Nardi & Margherita Borella & Ross Abram, 2024. "Health inequality and economic disparities by race, ethnicity, and gender," IFS Working Papers W24/41, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    16. Bridget Terry Long, 2004. "Does the Format of a Financial Aid Program Matter? The Effect of State In-Kind Tuition Subsidies," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 86(3), pages 767-782, August.
    17. Perone, G.;, 2024. "Prioritizing investments in public healthcare to address the COVID-19 outbreak: Evidence from Europe and the South Caucasus," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 24/05, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    18. Roman Neyter & Oleg Nivievskyi, 2023. "Effect of subsidies on farms' exit decision," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 941-959, October.
    19. Gil-Molto, Maria Jose & Hole, Arne Risa, 2004. "Tests for the consistency of three-level nested logit models with utility maximization," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 133-137, October.
    20. Ney Luiz Bellegard & Rodolfo Coelho Prates, 2017. "Determinants Of Proficiency In Underlying Processes Of Technological Innovation Management," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(06), pages 1-38, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences; Access; Demand responsive transportation; Public transit; Surveys; Transportation disadvantaged persons; Travel behavior;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt9863j1fz. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.