IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt3vq3k9h3.html

Exploring the Equity Effects of VMT Mitigation Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Keuntae
  • Volker, Jamey M.B.
  • McGinnis, Claire
  • Zepeda, Melissa
  • Barajas, Jesus M.

Abstract

In 2018, pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 743 (2013), the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the California Natural Resources Agency promulgated regulations and technical guidance that eliminated automobile level of service (LOS) as a transportation impact metric for land development projects under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and replaced it with Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). The authors investigated the equity effects of VMT mitigation measures and developed a framework for evaluating those effects at the project level. The authors then applied the framework to two highway expansion case studies in California. They found that most VMT mitigation would be implemented at least partially within the project impact areas, as well as some disadvantaged communities, but would generally benefit communities outside of the project area, too. Most of the proposed mitigation measures would not displace existing residences or businesses or pose a significant risk of gentrification. Many of the measures showed substantial potential to improve accessibility to jobs, though less potential to improve accessibility to grocery stores. Community engagement and empowerment was harder to gauge. Overall, the five-part framework can provide a first-cut assessment of the equity effects of VMT mitigation measures during the environmental review phase of VMT-generating projects, like roadway expansions. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Keuntae & Volker, Jamey M.B. & McGinnis, Claire & Zepeda, Melissa & Barajas, Jesus M., 2025. "Exploring the Equity Effects of VMT Mitigation Measures," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt3vq3k9h3, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt3vq3k9h3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3vq3k9h3.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reid Ewing & Robert Cervero, 2010. "Travel and the Built Environment," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 265-294.
    2. Davis, Coray & Jha, Manoj K., 2011. "A dynamic modeling approach to investigate impacts to protected and low-income populations in highway planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 598-610, August.
    3. Pierce, Gregory & Shoup, Donald, 2013. "Getting the Prices Right: An Evaluation of Pricing Parking by Demand in San Francisco," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2h76j73j, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Elkind, Ethan & Lamm, Ted, 2018. "Considerations for Mitigating VehicleMiles Traveled under SB 743," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3ns22813, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Gregory Pierce & Donald Shoup, 2013. "Getting the Prices Right," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(1), pages 67-81, January.
    6. Lisa Schweitzer & Brian Taylor, 2008. "Just pricing: the distributional effects of congestion pricing and sales taxes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(6), pages 797-812, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abulibdeh, Ammar & Andrey, Jean & Melnik, Matthew, 2015. "Insights into the fairness of cordon pricing based on origin–destination data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 61-67.
    2. Handy, Susan L & Volker, Jamey M. B. & Hosseinzade, Reyhane, 2024. "Assessing the Effectiveness of Potential Vehicle-Miles-Traveled (VMT) Mitigation Measures," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1pf307sp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Khordagui, Nagwa, 2019. "Parking prices and the decision to drive to work: Evidence from California," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 479-495.
    4. Siqi Song & Chen-Chieh Feng & Mi Diao, 2020. "Vehicle quota control, transport infrastructure investment and vehicle travel: A pseudo panel analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(12), pages 2527-2546, September.
    5. Kim, Jungyeol & Sarkar, Saswati & Venkatesh, Santosh S. & Ryerson, Megan Smirti & Starobinski, David, 2020. "An epidemiological diffusion framework for vehicular messaging in general transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 160-190.
    6. Arnott, Richard & Inci, Eren & Rowse, John, 2015. "Downtown curbside parking capacity," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 83-97.
    7. Chatman, Daniel G. & Manville, Michael, 2014. "Theory versus implementation in congestion-priced parking: An evaluation of SFpark, 2011–2012," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 52-60.
    8. Philipp Ströhle & Christoph M. Flath & Johannes Gärttner, 2019. "Leveraging Customer Flexibility for Car-Sharing Fleet Optimization," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 42-61, February.
    9. Handy, Susan L. & Volker, Jamey M. B., 2025. "Assessment of Options for Quantifying Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) from Mitigation Measures," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt29r3h971, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    10. Fang Zong & Meng Zeng & Ping Yu, 2024. "A parking pricing scheme considering parking dynamics," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1349-1371, August.
    11. Lehner, Stephan & Peer, Stefanie, 2019. "The price elasticity of parking: A meta-analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 177-191.
    12. Niu, Zhipeng & Hu, Xiaowei & Fatmi, Mahmudur & Qi, Shouming & Wang, Siqing & Yang, Haihua & An, Shi, 2023. "Parking occupancy prediction under COVID-19 anti-pandemic policies: A model based on a policy-aware temporal convolutional network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    13. Xiaohang Zhao & Mingyuan Zhang, 2024. "Enhancing Predictive Models for On-Street Parking Occupancy: Integrating Adaptive GCN and GRU with Household Categories and POI Factors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Wang, Pengfei & Guan, Hongzhi & Liu, Peng, 2020. "Modeling and solving the optimal allocation-pricing of public parking resources problem in urban-scale network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 74-98.
    15. Geva, Sharon & Fulman, Nir & Ben-Elia, Eran, 2022. "Getting the prices right: Drivers' cruising choices in a serious parking game," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 54-75.
    16. Taylor, Elizabeth Jean, 2020. "Parking policy: The politics and uneven use of residential parking space in Melbourne," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Krishnamurthy, Chandra Kiran B. & Ngo, Nicole S., 2020. "The effects of smart-parking on transit and traffic: Evidence from SFpark," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    18. Ben-Dor, Golan & Ogulenko, Aleksey & Klein, Ido & Ben-Elia, Eran & Benenson, Itzhak, 2024. "Simulation-based policy evaluation of monetary car driving disincentives in Jerusalem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Mingardo, Giuliano & Vermeulen, Susan & Bornioli, Anna, 2022. "Parking pricing strategies and behaviour: Evidence from the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 185-197.
    20. Qiao‐Chu He & Tiantian Nie & Yun Yang & Zuo‐Jun Shen, 2021. "Beyond Repositioning: Crowd‐Sourcing and Geo‐Fencing for Shared‐Mobility Systems," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3448-3466, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt3vq3k9h3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.