Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer
With political campaigns becoming increasingly adversarial, scholars have recently given some much-needed attention to the impact of negative advertising on turnout.In a widely recognized Review article and subsequent book, Ansolabehere and his colleagues (1994, 1995) contend that attack advertising drives potential voters away from the polls. We dispute the generalizability of these claims outside of the experimental setting. Using NES survey data as well aggregate sources, we subject this previous research to rigorous real-world testing. The survey data directly contradict Ansolabehere et al.'s findings, yielding evidence of a turnout advantage for those recollecting negative presidential campaign advertising. In attempting to replicate Ansolabehere et alâ€™s earlier aggregate results we uncover quite significant discrepancies and inconsistencies in their dataset. This analysis leads to the conclusion that their aggregate study is hopelessly flawed. We must conclude that attack advertisingâ€™s demobilization dangers are greatly exaggerated by Ansolabehere et al., while they completely miss negative political advertisingâ€™s turnout benefits -- at least in votersâ€™ own context.
|Date of creation:||26 Aug 1996|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.escholarship.org/repec/issr/|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:issres:qt7gf3q1w1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lisa Schiff)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.