IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bie/wpaper/695.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

NTU-Solutions for the Taxation Game

Author

Listed:
  • Rosenmüller, Joachim

    (Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University)

Abstract

The Taxation Game is a cooperative game played between a set of countries $I$ = {$1,\ldots,n$} admitting the operation of a multinational enterprise (MNE, "the firm" ) within their jurisdiction. The firm, when operating within the territory of a subgroup $S {\subseteq} I$ of countries (a coalition) will generate a profit. Cooperating countries can agree about a share of the profit to be available for imposing taxes according to their rules and specifications, i.e., their tax rate or $tariff$. If the taxation basis, i.e., the profit obtained by the firm, is taken as the (monetary) value of the game, then we obtain a side payment or TU game, represented by a coalitional function $\stackrel{\circ}{\it{v}}$ defined on coalitions. This version is discussed by W. F. Richter. This author suggests that countries should agree on an allocation of the tax basis, i.e., the total profit $v(I)$ generated when the firm is operating in all participating countries. However, the profit obtained by the firm when (hypothetically) operating in in a subgroup (a coalition) $S {\subseteq} I$ of all countries should be taken into account. Consequently, the share of the tax basis alloted to a country should be determined by the Shapley value of the taxation game. The Shapley value "as a tool in theoretical economics" has widely been applied in Game Theory and Equilibrium Theory, but also in applications to Cost Sharing problems. We recall the Tenessee valley project, the determination of airport fees, and many others . By his approach Richter creates an interesting new field of applications. Within this paper we present a modification of this model by introducing the game $\stackrel{*}{\it{v}}$ dual to $\stackrel{\circ}{\it{v}}$. Moreover, we introduce the tariffs of countries, as the incentives of all parties involved (and actually of the firm) are based on their actual tax income depending on the tariffs. Then the resulting game is of NTU character and involves the tariffs. To this NTU game we apply a version of the Shapley NTU value. This way we characterize an agreement of the countries involved regarding the share of profit and the taxes resulting. A particular version of an NTU--game is given by a "bargaining problem" for $n$ countries. For simplicity of the argument we start out with this version and discuss the bargaining solution which are taylored versions of a Shapley version concept. We particularly deal with the Maschler-Perles solution based on superadditivity. Here, we focus on a suitable generalization of the Maschler-Perles solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosenmüller, Joachim, 2024. "NTU-Solutions for the Taxation Game," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 695, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  • Handle: RePEc:bie:wpaper:695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2994186/2994189
    File Function: First Version, 2024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolfram F. Richter, 2019. "Aligning profit taxation with value creation," CESifo Working Paper Series 7589, CESifo.
    2. S.C. Littlechild & G.F. Thompson, 1977. "Aircraft Landing Fees: A Game Theory Approach," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 8(1), pages 186-204, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Shubik, 1984. "The Cooperative Form, the Value and the Allocation of Joint Costs and Benefits," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 706, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    2. Paula Corcho & José Ferreira, 2003. "Generalized externality games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 163-184, March.
    3. Wuping Xin & David Levinson, 2015. "Stochastic Congestion and Pricing Model with Endogenous Departure Time Selection and Heterogeneous Travelers," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 37-52, March.
    4. Alparslan-Gok, S.Z. & Brânzei, R. & Tijs, S.H., 2008. "Cooperative Interval Games Arising from Airport Situations with Interval Data," Other publications TiSEM 5ded50b5-2a11-4d25-8511-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Cano Berlanga, Sebastian & Giménez Gómez, José M. (José Manuel) & Vilella Bach, Misericòrdia, 2015. "Enjoying cooperative games: The R package GameTheory," Working Papers 2072/247653, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    6. Richard S.J. Tol, 2016. "Distributional Implications of Geoengineering," Working Paper Series 08316, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    7. Hou, Dongshuang & Sun, Hao & Sun, Panfei & Driessen, Theo, 2018. "A note on the Shapley value for airport cost pooling game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 162-169.
    8. Giulia Cesari & Roberto Lucchetti & Stefano Moretti, 2017. "Generalized additive games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(4), pages 919-939, November.
    9. Welter, Dominik & Napel, Stefan, 2016. "Responsibility-based allocation of cartel damages," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145886, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    10. Paula González & Carmen Herrero, 2004. "Optimal sharing of surgical costs in the presence of queues," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 59(3), pages 435-446, July.
    11. Martin Shubik, 2011. "The Present and Future of Game Theory," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1808, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    12. Koster, M.A.L. & Molina, E. & Sprumont, Y. & Tijs, S.H., 1998. "Core Representations of the Standard Fixed Tree Game," Other publications TiSEM 4bd3bd05-b4ba-454c-8e6a-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Moulin, Hervé, 2014. "Sharing the cost of redundant items," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 339-352.
    14. Martín, Juan Carlos & Voltes-Dorta, Augusto, 2011. "The econometric estimation of airports' cost function," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 112-127, January.
    15. Levinson, David, 2005. "Micro-foundations of congestion and pricing: A game theory perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(7-9), pages 691-704.
    16. Ben-Shahar Danny & Sulganik Eyal, 2009. "Fair Depreciation: A Shapley Value Approach," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, April.
    17. R. Brânzei & E. Iñarra & S. Tijs & J. M. Zarzuelo, 2005. "Cooperation by Asymmetric Agents in a Joint Project," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 7(4), pages 623-640, October.
    18. Lech Kruś, 2009. "Cost allocation in partition function form games," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 19(2), pages 39-49.
    19. Sutee Anantsuksomsri & Nij Tontisirin, 2016. "A spatial agent-based model of a congestion game: evolutionary game theory in space," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 57(2), pages 371-391, November.
    20. Lipsman, Michael Aaron, 1994. "A theory of transportation clubs with special application to the domestic aviation system," ISU General Staff Papers 1994010108000012284, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bie:wpaper:695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bettina Weingarten (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imbiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.