IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aue/wpaper/2404.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pathways for Pan-European Energy System Decarbonization: The Effect of Emission Policies on Target Alignment

Author

Listed:
  • Theis Madsen
  • Yiannis Kountouris
  • Rasmus Bramstoft
  • Phoebe Koundouri
  • Dogan Keles

Abstract

Decarbonization of the energy system is a major challenge for today's energy system to combat climate change. This challenge is addressed in the EU through different political strategies and plans such as the European Green Deal, Fit-for-55, and REPowerEU, which set specific emission reduction goals for 2030 and 2050. Different mechanisms are in place to achieve these goals, such as the system-wide ETS and the country-level National Energy and Climate Plans. However, there is a difference in the enforcement level between European countries, despite their connection to the same integrated energy system. Hence, there might be discrepancies between the effectiveness of the EU system-level target and the achievements of national goals and plans. To understand and address these discrepancies, we utilize the open-source, sector-coupled energy system optimization model Balmorel to analyze the impact of different decarbonization methods in a fully interconnected, pan-European energy system. In three scenarios, we consider 1) the use of only a system-level carbon budget in line with Fit-for-55 and the European Green Deal, 2) the application of a carbon budget at the country level, and 3) the use of a carbon tax instead of a budget on all production of electricity, heat, and hydrogen. The novelty of this paper lies in the first comparison of these three decarbonization mechanisms and their impact on alignment with policy targets. We demonstrate that the pan-European energy system can reach decarbonization targets across all scenarios. Still, diving from the system perspective into the country level, challenges appear, causing nations to overshoot their allocated budgets. Country-level emission targets are more effective with little cost increase compared to the only system-level target scenario but also cause crossborder effects of fossil fuel based energy production. The carbon tax scenario is the most effective at decarbonizing but comes at up to 27 % higher costs in intermediary years, requiring more early investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Theis Madsen & Yiannis Kountouris & Rasmus Bramstoft & Phoebe Koundouri & Dogan Keles, 2024. "Pathways for Pan-European Energy System Decarbonization: The Effect of Emission Policies on Target Alignment," DEOS Working Papers 2404, Athens University of Economics and Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:aue:wpaper:2404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wpa.deos.aueb.gr/docs/DeCarb.draft.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bramstoft, Rasmus & Pizarro-Alonso, Amalia & Jensen, Ida Græsted & Ravn, Hans & Münster, Marie, 2020. "Modelling of renewable gas and renewable liquid fuels in future integrated energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    2. Karlo Hainsch & Thorsten Burandt & Konstantin Loffler & Claudia Kemfert & Pao-Yu Oei & Christian von Hirschhausen, 2021. "Emission Pathways Towards a Low-Carbon Energy System for Europe: A Model-Based Analysis of Decarbonization Scenarios," The Energy Journal, , vol. 42(5), pages 41-66, September.
    3. Zhang, Hongjun & Chen, Wenying & Huang, Weilong, 2016. "TIMES modelling of transport sector in China and USA: Comparisons from a decarbonization perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1505-1514.
    4. Finn Roar Aune & Rolf Golombek, 2021. "Are Carbon Prices Redundant in the 2030 EU Climate and Energy Policy Package?," The Energy Journal, , vol. 42(3), pages 225-264, May.
    5. Lester, Mason Scott & Bramstoft, Rasmus & Münster, Marie, 2020. "Analysis on Electrofuels in Future Energy Systems: A 2050 Case Study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    6. Cristina Peñasco & Laura Díaz Anadón & Elena Verdolini, 2021. "Systematic review of the outcomes and trade-offs of ten types of decarbonization policy instruments," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(3), pages 257-265, March.
    7. Zhu, K. & Victoria, M. & Brown, T. & Andresen, G.B. & Greiner, M., 2019. "Impact of CO2 prices on the design of a highly decarbonised coupled electricity and heating system in Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 622-634.
    8. Jonas Meckling & Thomas Sterner & Gernot Wagner, 2017. "Policy sequencing toward decarbonization," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 2(12), pages 918-922, December.
    9. Papadis, Elisa & Tsatsaronis, George, 2020. "Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madsen, Theis & Kountouris, Ioannis & Bramstoft, Rasmus & Koundouri, Phoebe & Keles, Dogan, 2025. "European or national-level emission reduction policy? Effectiveness and energy system implications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    2. Rosendal, M. & Janin, J. & Heggarty, T. & Pisinger, D. & Bramstoft, R. & Münster, M., 2025. "The benefits and challenges of soft-linking investment and operational energy system models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 385(C).
    3. Ives, Matthew & Cesaro, Zac & Bramstoft, Rasmus & Bañares-Alcántara, René, 2023. "Facilitating deep decarbonization via sector coupling of green hydrogen and ammonia," INET Oxford Working Papers 2023-04, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    4. Campion, Nicolas & Montanari, Giulia & Guzzini, Alessandro & Visser, Lennard & Alcayde, Alfredo, 2025. "Green hydrogen techno-economic assessments from simulated and measured solar photovoltaic power profiles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    5. Koumparakis, Christos & Kountouris, Ioannis & Bramstoft, Rasmus, 2025. "Utilization of excess heat in future Power-to-X energy hubs through sector-coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PA).
    6. Rosendal, Mathias Berg & Münster, Marie & Bramstoft, Rasmus, 2024. "Renewable fuel production and the impact of hydrogen infrastructure — A case study of the Nordics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    7. Ioannis Kountouris & Rasmus Bramstoft & Theis Madsen & Juan Gea-Bermúdez & Marie Münster & Dogan Keles, 2024. "A unified European hydrogen infrastructure planning to support the rapid scale-up of hydrogen production," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Clara Ma & Cristina Peñasco & Laura Díaz Anadón, 2025. "Technology innovation and environmental outcomes of road transportation policy instruments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Sifnaios, Ioannis & Sneum, Daniel Møller & Jensen, Adam R. & Fan, Jianhua & Bramstoft, Rasmus, 2023. "The impact of large-scale thermal energy storage in the energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    10. Gea-Bermúdez, Juan & Bramstoft, Rasmus & Koivisto, Matti & Kitzing, Lena & Ramos, Andrés, 2023. "Going offshore or not: Where to generate hydrogen in future integrated energy systems?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Petrović, Stefan & Bühler, Fabian & Radoman, Uroš & McKenna, Russell, 2022. "Power transformers as excess heat sources – a case study for Denmark," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    12. Kountouris, Ioannis & Langer, Lissy & Bramstoft, Rasmus & Münster, Marie & Keles, Dogan, 2023. "Power-to-X in energy hubs: A Danish case study of renewable fuel production," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    13. Yang, Chuxiao & Wu, Haitao & Guo, Yunxia & Hao, Yu, 2024. "Possible carbon circular pathway exploration for oil transition under the consideration of energy supply constraint and uncertainty," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    14. de Guibert, Paul & Shirizadeh, Behrang & Quirion, Philippe, 2020. "Variable time-step: A method for improving computational tractability for energy system models with long-term storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    15. Arsani Alina & Stefan George, 2024. "Energy Transition and European Sub-Models. Restructuring EU Economy," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 86-101.
    16. Rohan Best & Paul J. Burke, 2020. "Energy mix persistence and the effect of carbon pricing," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 555-574, July.
    17. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    18. Bablu K. Ghosh & Saad Mekhilef & Shameem Ahmad & Swapan K. Ghosh, 2022. "A Review on Global Emissions by E-Products Based Waste: Technical Management for Reduced Effects and Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Stančin, H. & Mikulčić, H. & Wang, X. & Duić, N., 2020. "A review on alternative fuels in future energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    20. Chen, Yuche & Zhang, Yunteng & Fan, Yueyue & Hu, Kejia & Zhao, Jianyou, 2017. "A dynamic programming approach for modeling low-carbon fuel technology adoption considering learning-by-doing effect," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 825-835.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Energy policy; Energy Transition Pathway; Decarbonization Strategies; Balmorel; Energy System Modeling;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C3 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables
    • C8 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs
    • O2 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aue:wpaper:2404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ekaterini Glynou (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diauegr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.