IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.17231.html

The Buffett Effect

Author

Listed:
  • Pawel Robert Smolinski
  • Siddharth Saridevi

Abstract

We study whether stock disclosures by recognizable investors generate abnormal market reactions beyond the reactions produced by comparable but non-recognizable managers. We define the Buffett effect as the incremental abnormal return to a disclosed new position that is attributable to the public recognition of the disclosing investor. We construct a recognition index from Wikipedia pageviews and ProQuest news mentions. Using data from 2000 to 2025 we compare market reaction to disclosures of 24 recognizable discretionary funds with disclosures of 24 matched control funds. New-position disclosures by recognizable managers generate a positive disclosure premium over the filing date and the following trading days, and the premium increases with investor recognition. We construct calendar-time portfolios that mechanically copy each group's disclosed purchases and find that copying the most recognized investors earns a significant alpha that persists for months and does not reverse. The evidence is most consistent with an entangled attention-information channel: investor recognition directs scarce investor attention toward selected disclosures, and the information revealed in those disclosures is then capitalized into prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Pawel Robert Smolinski & Siddharth Saridevi, 2026. "The Buffett Effect," Papers 2610.17231, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.17231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.17231
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, Stephen J. & Warner, Jerold B., 1985. "Using daily stock returns : The case of event studies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 3-31, March.
    2. Carhart, Mark M, 1997. "On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 57-82, March.
    3. Joseph Engelberg & Caroline Sasseville & Jared Williams, 2012. "Market Madness? The Case of Mad Money," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 351-364, February.
    4. Lily Fang & Joel Peress, 2009. "Media Coverage and the Cross‐section of Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(5), pages 2023-2052, October.
    5. Sims, Christopher A., 2003. "Implications of rational inattention," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 665-690, April.
    6. Zhang, Mingshan, 2022. "Warren Buffett Anomaly," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    7. David Hirshleifer, 2020. "Presidential Address: Social Transmission Bias in Economics and Finance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(4), pages 1779-1831, August.
    8. Grossman, Sanford J & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1980. "On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 393-408, June.
    9. Matthew D. Webb, 2023. "Reworking wild bootstrap‐based inference for clustered errors," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(3), pages 839-858, August.
    10. Amihud, Yakov, 2002. "Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 31-56, January.
    11. Sarah E. Bonner & Artur Hugon & Beverly R. Walther, 2007. "Investor Reaction to Celebrity Analysts: The Case of Earnings Forecast Revisions," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(3), pages 481-513, June.
    12. George Loewenstein & Zachary Wojtowicz, 2025. "The Economics of Attention," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 63(3), pages 1038-1089, September.
    13. A. Colin Cameron & Jonah B. Gelbach & Douglas L. Miller, 2008. "Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 90(3), pages 414-427, August.
    14. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1993. "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-56, February.
    15. Nicholas C. Barberis & Lawrence J. Jin, 2023. "Model-free and Model-based Learning as Joint Drivers of Investor Behavior," NBER Working Papers 31081, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Frank, Mary Margaret & Poterba, James M & Shackelford, Douglas A & Shoven, John B, 2004. "Copycat Funds: Information Disclosure Regulation and the Returns to Active Management in the Mutual Fund Industry," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(2), pages 515-541, October.
    17. Mark Dean & Nathaniel Neligh, 2023. "Experimental Tests of Rational Inattention," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 131(12), pages 3415-3461.
    18. Brad M. Barber & Xing Huang & Terrance Odean & Christopher Schwarz, 2022. "Attention‐Induced Trading and Returns: Evidence from Robinhood Users," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(6), pages 3141-3190, December.
    19. Ekkehart Boehmer & Charles M. Jones & Xiaoyan Zhang & Xinran Zhang, 2021. "Tracking Retail Investor Activity," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 76(5), pages 2249-2305, October.
    20. Han, Bing & Hirshleifer, David & Walden, Johan, 2022. "Social Transmission Bias and Investor Behavior," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 57(1), pages 390-412, February.
    21. Brad M. Barber & Xing Huang & Philippe Jorion & Terrance Odean & Christopher Schwarz, 2024. "A (Sub)penny for Your Thoughts: Tracking Retail Investor Activity in TAQ," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(4), pages 2403-2427, August.
    22. Sean Shun Cao & Kai Du & Baozhong Yang & Alan L. Zhang, 2021. "Copycat Skills and Disclosure Costs: Evidence from Peer Companies’ Digital Footprints," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 59(4), pages 1261-1302, September.
    23. Machus, Tobias & Mestel, Roland & Theissen, Erik, 2022. "Heroes, just for one day: The impact of Donald Trump’s tweets on stock prices," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jang, Jaehee & Jun, Sang-gyung, 2025. "YouTube view count, investor attention and stock returns," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Xiaofei Zhao, 2017. "Does Information Intensity Matter for Stock Returns? Evidence from Form 8-K Filings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1382-1404, May.
    3. Jank, Stephan & Roling, Christoph & Smajlbegovic, Esad, 2021. "Flying under the radar: The effects of short-sale disclosure rules on investor behavior and stock prices," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 209-233.
    4. Ahmad, Fawad & Oriani, Raffaele, 2022. "Investor attention, information acquisition, and value premium: A mispricing perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Steven Crawford & Wesley Gray & Bryan R. Johnson & Richard A. Price, 2018. "What Motivates Buy-Side Analysts to Share Recommendations Online?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2574-2589, June.
    6. Fung, Scott & Obaid, Khaled & Tsai, Shih-Chuan, 2024. "Information acquisition and processing skills of institutions and retail investors around information shocks," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    7. Yung, Kenneth & Nafar, Nadia, 2017. "Investor attention and the expected returns of reits," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 423-439.
    8. Duan, Xinrui & Guo, Li & Li, Frank Weikai & Tu, Jun, 2025. "Do factor models capture both sentiment and limited attention?," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    9. He, Jianan, 2022. "Factors explaining capital market reactions during corporate, sovereign, and pandemic events," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 134150, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    10. Zhi Da & Jian Hua & Tim Chih-Ching Hung & Lin Peng, 2025. "Market Returns and a Tale of Two Types of Attention," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(12), pages 10505-10537, December.
    11. Sani, Jalal & Shroff, Nemit & White, Hal, 2023. "Spillover effects of mandatory portfolio disclosures on corporate investment," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(2).
    12. Zhang, Hejie & Fan, Hongzhong, 2025. "Mainland Chinese investor attention influences on international markets: The impact of Game of Hunting on the stock returns of head-hunting companies in Hong Kong," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    13. Vikas Agarwal & Wei Jiang & Yuehua Tang & Baozhong Yang, 2013. "Uncovering Hedge Fund Skill from the Portfolio Holdings They Hide," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 68(2), pages 739-783, April.
    14. Wu, Chen-Hui & Lin, Chan-Jane, 2017. "The impact of media coverage on investor trading behavior and stock returns," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 151-172.
    15. Peter Cziraki & Jordi Mondria & Thomas Wu, 2021. "Asymmetric Attention and Stock Returns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 48-71, January.
    16. Li, Frank Weikai & Sun, Chengzhu, 2022. "Information acquisition and expected returns: Evidence from EDGAR search traffic," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Vinay Patel, 2015. "Price Discovery in US and Australian Stock and Options Markets," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 27, July-Dece.
    18. Lixing Mei & Yulei Rao & Mei Wang & Jianxin Wang, 2019. "Do investors post messages differently from mobile devices? The correlation between mobile Internet messages posting and stock returns," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 66(4), pages 423-452, December.
    19. Valentin Dimitrov & Prem C. Jain, 2026. "Yes, Virginia, there are superstar money managers," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 867-886, February.
    20. Michaely, Roni & Rubin, Amir & Vedrashko, Alexander, 2016. "Are Friday announcements special? Overcoming selection bias," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 65-85.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.17231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.