IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2609.18441.html

Multitask Reinforcement Learning for Assisting Choice Model Specification

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Nova
  • Stephane Hess
  • Sander Van Cranenburgh

Abstract

Discrete choice model specification is a time-consuming task in which modellers often specify and estimate multiple models while balancing goodness-of-fit, parsimony, and behavioural plausibility. We present Delphos, a multitask reinforcement learning framework that learns transferable specification strategies across transport choice datasets. Delphos frames model specification as a sequential decision-making problem in which it applies a sequence of modelling actions and receives feedback from an estimation environment based on model performance and convergence. To transfer modelling decisions across datasets with different sets of variables, Delphos represents utility specifications as sets of modelling terms using a DeepSet-Q architecture, allowing a shared specification policy to learn across multiple datasets. Trained on nine transport choice datasets, Delphos consistently outperforms independently trained single-task agents, indicating that sharing modelling experience improves learning efficiency and helps identify promising sequences of modelling decisions with fewer unsuccessful estimation attempts. When applied without further training to the unseen Swissmetro and Decisions datasets, the same agent identifies competitive specifications in less than 20 minutes on a standard CPU. It achieves a higher log-likelihood per observation than the VNS metaheuristic on Swissmetro and performance comparable to a published MNL specification developed by expert modellers on Decisions. These findings show that accumulating and reusing modelling experience enables Delphos to function as an intelligent assistant for discrete choice model specification. It reduces manual trial-and-error while allowing modellers to retain control over model diagnosis, refinement, and final selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Nova & Stephane Hess & Sander Van Cranenburgh, 2026. "Multitask Reinforcement Learning for Assisting Choice Model Specification," Papers 2609.18441, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.18441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.18441
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2016. "Discrete choice models’ ρ2: A reintroduction to an old friend," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 60-65.
    2. Axhausen, Kay W. & Hess, Stephane & König, Arnd & Abay, Georg & Bates, John J. & Bierlaire, Michel, 2008. "Income and distance elasticities of values of travel time savings: New Swiss results," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 173-185, May.
    3. Gabriel Nova & Sander van Cranenburgh & Stephane Hess, 2024. "Understanding the decision-making process of choice modellers," Papers 2411.01704, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    4. Ortelli, Nicola & Hillel, Tim & Pereira, Francisco C. & de Lapparent, Matthieu & Bierlaire, Michel, 2021. "Assisted specification of discrete choice models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    5. Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly, 2024. "Introduction to the Handbook of Choice Modelling," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 1, pages 1-4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Beeramoole, Prithvi Bhat & Arteaga, Cristian & Pinz, Alban & Haque, Md Mazharul & Paz, Alexander, 2023. "Extensive hypothesis testing for estimation of mixed-Logit models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    7. Hess, Stephane & Palma, David, 2019. "Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    8. de Vries, Martijn Olivier & Hernández, José Ignacio & Mouter, Niek, 2025. "The value of accessibility, health, safety, inclusion and sustainability: a public willingness to pay experiment," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    9. Nova, Gabriel & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Hess, Stephane, 2025. "Understanding the decision-making process of choice modellers," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    10. Chiara Calastri & Romain Crastes dit Sourd & Stephane Hess, 2020. "We want it all: experiences from a survey seeking to capture social network structures, lifetime events and short-term travel and activity planning," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 175-201, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lorenzo Mu~noz & Stephane Hess & Thomas O. Hancock & Georges Sfeir, 2026. "Using machine learning metrics to provide deeper insights into the performance of choice models," Papers 2609.20655, arXiv.org.
    2. Gabriel Nova & Sander van Cranenburgh & Stephane Hess, 2024. "Understanding the decision-making process of choice modellers," Papers 2411.01704, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    3. Nova, Gabriel & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Hess, Stephane, 2025. "Understanding the decision-making process of choice modellers," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    4. Hess, Stephane & Daly, Andrew & Bliemer, Michiel & Guevara, Angelo & Daziano, Ricardo & Dekker, Thijs, 2026. "Statistical significance in choice modelling: computation, usage and reporting," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    5. Georges Sfeir & Gabriel Nova & Stephane Hess & Sander van Cranenburgh, 2025. "Can large language models assist choice modelling? Insights into prompting strategies and current models' capabilities," Papers 2507.21790, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
    6. Stephane Hess & Sander van Cranenburgh, 2025. "Combine and conquer: model averaging for out-of-distribution forecasting," Papers 2506.03693, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2026.
    7. Nova, Gabriel & Guevara, C. Angelo & Hess, Stephane & Hancock, Thomas O., 2025. "A random utility maximisation model considering the information search process," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Rotaris, Lucia & Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Danielis, Romeo & Intini, Mario & Scorrano, Mariangela, 2026. "From ownership to access: Policies to support the growth of peer-to-peer car sharing in Italy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Poudel, Niranjan & Singleton, Patrick A., 2024. "Willingness to pay for changes in travel time and work time: A stated choice experiment of US commuters," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. John Buckell & David A Hensher & Stephane Hess, 2021. "Kicking the habit is hard: A hybrid choice model investigation into the role of addiction in smoking behavior," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 3-19, January.
    11. Akshay Vij & Stephane Hess, 2025. "Posterior inference of attitude-behaviour relationships using latent class choice models," Papers 2509.08373, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    12. Fu, Mengying & Othman, Mohammed M. & Moeckel, Rolf & Hornung, Mirko & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2026. "User preferences for Regional Air Mobility: Insights from Germany," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    13. Hancock, Thomas O. & Hess, Stephane & Choudhury, Charisma F. & Tsoleridis, Panagiotis, 2024. "Decision field theory: An extension for real-world settings," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    14. Hancock, Thomas O. & Broekaert, Jan & Hess, Stephane & Choudhury, Charisma F., 2020. "Quantum probability: A new method for modelling travel behaviour," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 165-198.
    15. Palma, David & Hess, Stephane, 2022. "Extending the Multiple Discrete Continuous (MDC) modelling framework to consider complementarity, substitution, and an unobserved budget," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 13-35.
    16. Oyama, Yuki & Fukuda, Daisuke & Imura, Naoto & Nishinari, Katsuhiro, 2024. "Do people really want fast and precisely scheduled delivery? E-commerce customers' valuations of home delivery timing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    17. Gramsch-Calvo, Benjamin & Okamura, Koki & Takami, Kiyoshi & Oyama, Yuki & Chikaraishi, Makoto & Axhausen, Kay W. & Parady, Giancarlos, 2025. "Going the extra mile: Estimating the willingness to travel to meet with friends using a joint destination choice model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    18. Yuki Oyama & Daisuke Fukuda & Naoto Imura & Katsuhiro Nishinari, 2022. "E-commerce users' preferences for delivery options," Papers 2301.00666, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    19. Zhang, Shujing & Hancock, Thomas O. & Hess, Stephane & Jia, Shunping, 2026. "Exploring taste heterogeneity and substitution patterns in dockless bike-sharing parking preferences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    20. Frings, Oliver & Abildtrup, Jens & Montagné-Huck, Claire & Gorel, Salomé & Stenger, Anne, 2023. "Do individual PES buyers care about additionality and free-riding? A choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.18441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.