IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2609.18172.html

What No First Stage Can Detect: Functional-Form Contamination in Linear IV

Author

Listed:
  • Parush Arora

Abstract

Applied instrumental variables (IV) practice reports a first-stage F, now often the conditional F of Sanderson and Windmeijer (2016), and reads a large value as license to interpret the second stage. We show that no first-stage diagnostic can provide it. With a scalar instrument, a scalar treatment, and covariates entered linearly, the 2SLS estimand splits into a signal that a saturated specification would target and a contamination, the covariance between curvature in the instrument propensity and a covariate level function. The same nuisance sits in both terms, so it biases the estimand and inflates the reported strength at once. When the instrument is nearly collinear with the covariates the signal vanishes and the strength is manufactured. When the strength is honest the curvature still biases the estimand through the outcome, where no first-stage number reaches it. We prove that no functional of the joint distribution of instrument, treatment, and covariates can detect this second bias, and we give a directed test built from reduced-form regressions, a corrected estimator, and a reportable contamination share. Two applications show the modes. A husband's insurance instrument (Olson, 1998) has a conditional F above 36,000, yet correcting a linear income control more than doubles the estimate. The instrument of Nunn and Wantchekon (2011) loses most of its first stage once geography enters flexibly.

Suggested Citation

  • Parush Arora, 2026. "What No First Stage Can Detect: Functional-Form Contamination in Linear IV," Papers 2609.18172, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.18172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.18172
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tauchen, George, 1985. "Diagnostic testing and evaluation of maximum likelihood models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1-2), pages 415-443.
    2. Tymon S{l}oczy'nski & Liyang Sun & S. Derya Uysal, 2026. "A Practical Guide to Instrumental Variables Methods with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," Papers 2605.15115, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    3. Christine Blandhol & John Bonney & Magne Mogstad & Alexander Torgovitsky, 2022. "When is TSLS Actually LATE?," NBER Working Papers 29709, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Isaiah Andrews & James H. Stock & Liyang Sun, 2019. "Weak Instruments in Instrumental Variables Regression: Theory and Practice," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 727-753, August.
    5. Douglas Staiger & James H. Stock, 1997. "Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 557-586, May.
    6. Nathan Nunn & Leonard Wantchekon, 2011. "The Slave Trade and the Origins of Mistrust in Africa," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(7), pages 3221-3252, December.
    7. Poterba, James M. & Venti, Steven F. & Wise, David A., 1995. "Do 401(k) contributions crowd out other personal saving?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 1-32, September.
    8. Bierens, Herman J, 1990. "A Consistent Conditional Moment Test of Functional Form," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 58(6), pages 1443-1458, November.
    9. Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham & Peter Hull & Michal Kolesár, 2024. "Contamination Bias in Linear Regressions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(12), pages 4015-4051, December.
    10. Imbens, Guido W & Angrist, Joshua D, 1994. "Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 467-475, March.
    11. Abadie, Alberto, 2003. "Semiparametric instrumental variable estimation of treatment response models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 231-263, April.
    12. James J. Heckman & Edward Vytlacil, 2005. "Structural Equations, Treatment Effects, and Econometric Policy Evaluation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 669-738, May.
    13. Alwyn Young, 2024. "Nearly collinear robust procedures for 2SLS estimation," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 24(1), pages 93-112, March.
    14. Mogstad, Magne & Torgovitsky, Alexander, 2024. "Instrumental variables with unobserved heterogeneity in treatment effects," Handbook of Labor Economics,, Elsevier.
    15. Megan T. Stevenson & Joshua B. Fischman, 2026. "Humans in the Loop: The Next Frontier in the Credibility Revolution," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 64(3), pages 801-828, September.
    16. Stevenson, Megan T. & Fischman, Joshua B., 2026. "Humans in the Loop: The Next Frontier in the Credibility Revolution," I4R Discussion Paper Series 296, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
    17. Magne Mogstad & Alexander Torgovitsky, 2024. "Instrumental Variables with Unobserved Heterogeneity in Treatment Effects," NBER Working Papers 32927, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Mert Demirer & Esther Duflo & Christian Hansen & Whitney Newey & James Robins, 2018. "Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 21(1), pages 1-68, February.
    19. Sloczynski, Tymon & Sun, Liyang & Uysal, S., 2026. "A Practical Guide to Instrumental Variables Methods with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 18684, IZA Network @ LISER.
    20. Sanderson, Eleanor & Windmeijer, Frank, 2016. "A weak instrument F-test in linear IV models with multiple endogenous variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 212-221.
    21. Clément de Chaisemartin, 2017. "Tolerating defiance? Local average treatment effects without monotonicity," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(2), pages 367-396, July.
    22. Hans van Kippersluis & Cornelius A. Rietveld, 2018. "Beyond plausibly exogenous," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 21(3), pages 316-331, October.
    23. José Luis Montiel Olea & Carolin Pflueger, 2013. "A Robust Test for Weak Instruments," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 358-369, July.
    24. Tymon Stoczyński & Liang Sun & S. Derya Uysal, 2026. "A Practical Guide to Instrumental Variables Methods with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," CESifo Working Paper Series 12696, CESifo.
    25. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    26. Newey, Whitney K, 1985. "Maximum Likelihood Specification Testing and Conditional Moment Tests," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(5), pages 1047-1070, September.
    27. Krumme, Anna & Westphal, Matthias, 2026. "Testing IV Validity and LATE Interpretation Using Flexible Covariate Specifications," IZA Discussion Papers 18573, IZA Network @ LISER.
    28. Craig A. Olson, 1998. "A comparison of parametric and semiparametric estimates of the effect of spousal health insurance coverage on weekly hours worked by wives," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(5), pages 543-565.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mogstad, Magne & Torgovitsky, Alexander, 2024. "Instrumental variables with unobserved heterogeneity in treatment effects," Handbook of Labor Economics,, Elsevier.
    2. Sokbae Lee & Ryo Okui & Yoon†Jae Whang, 2017. "Doubly robust uniform confidence band for the conditional average treatment effect function," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(7), pages 1207-1225, November.
    3. Sloczynski, Tymon & Sun, Liyang & Uysal, S., 2026. "A Practical Guide to Instrumental Variables Methods with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 18684, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Tymon S{l}oczy'nski & Liyang Sun & S. Derya Uysal, 2026. "A Practical Guide to Instrumental Variables Methods with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," Papers 2605.15115, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    5. Tymon Stoczyński & Liang Sun & S. Derya Uysal, 2026. "A Practical Guide to Instrumental Variables Methods with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," CESifo Working Paper Series 12696, CESifo.
    6. Phillip Heiler, 2022. "Efficient Covariate Balancing for the Local Average Treatment Effect," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 1569-1582, October.
    7. Silvia Moler‐Zapata & Richard Grieve & Anirban Basu & Stephen O’Neill, 2023. "How does a local instrumental variable method perform across settings with instruments of differing strengths? A simulation study and an evaluation of emergency surgery," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(9), pages 2113-2126, September.
    8. Alvarez, Luis A.F. & Toneto, Rodrigo, 2024. "The interpretation of 2SLS with a continuous instrument: A weighted LATE representation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    9. Vod Vilfort, 2026. "Robust Inference for Weighted Estimands," Papers 2607.07524, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
    10. Zhu, Rong & Onur, Ilke, 2023. "Does retirement (really) increase informal caregiving? Quasi-experimental evidence from Australia," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Arne Henningsen & Guy Low & David Wuepper & Tobias Dalhaus & Hugo Storm & Dagim Belay & Stefan Hirsch, 2026. "Estimating Causal Effects With Observational Data: Guidelines for Agricultural and Applied Economists," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(2), pages 356-382, June.
    12. Guilhem Bascle, 2008. "Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research," Post-Print hal-00576795, HAL.
    13. Jaeger, David, 2026. "Robustness? Range Tests for Equality and Equivalence Across Specifications," CEPR Discussion Papers 21802, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    14. Tymon Słoczyński & S. Derya Uysal & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2025. "Abadie’s Kappa and Weighting Estimators of the Local Average Treatment Effect," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 164-177, January.
    15. Huber Martin & Wüthrich Kaspar, 2019. "Local Average and Quantile Treatment Effects Under Endogeneity: A Review," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-27, January.
    16. Peter Hull & Michal Kolesár & Christopher Walters, 2022. "Labor by design: contributions of David Card, Joshua Angrist, and Guido Imbens," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 124(3), pages 603-645, July.
    17. Kleiner, Kristoph & Stoffman, Noah & Yonker, Scott E., 2021. "Friends with bankruptcy protection benefits," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(2), pages 578-605.
    18. Yingying Dong & Phillip Heiler, 2026. "Sharp Bounds and Inference in Sample Selection Models with Treatment Endogeneity," Papers 2606.09223, arXiv.org.
    19. Heckman, James J. & Schmierer, Daniel & Urzua, Sergio, 2010. "Testing the correlated random coefficient model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 177-203, October.
    20. Luis Antonio Fantozzi Alvarez & Rodrigo Toneto, 2024. "The interpretation of 2SLS with a continuous instrument: a weighted LATE representation," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2024_11, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.18172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.