IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.31102.html

Translation Readiness Index: Measuring the Semantic Proximity of Research to Patented Science

Author

Listed:
  • Paul X. McCarthy
  • Rasika Amarasiri
  • Xian Gong

Abstract

Universities, funders, and investors often need to spot research with translational potential early, long before downstream outcomes like licenses, startups, or patents emerge. We introduce the Translation Readiness Index (TRI), a scalable text-based metric that estimates a publication's semantic proximity to patent-linked science using only its title and abstract. Trained on over 20,000 scientific papers, contrasting papers paired with U.S. patents for the same invention against non-patent papers from the same journals, TRI uses domain-specific document embeddings to detect latent linguistic signals. Patent-paired papers consistently use an action-oriented "language of invention", whereas non-patent papers favor observational framing. Using only titles and abstracts, the model accurately distinguishes patent-paired research from comparison papers (ROC-AUC = 0.774). External validation across independent datasets shows that higher TRI scores strongly align with real-world translational activity. High scores correlate with industry coauthorship, author patent histories, and independent commercial-potential benchmarks. At the institutional level across leading global universities, average TRI correlates significantly with university-industry collaboration (r = 0.364, p

Suggested Citation

  • Paul X. McCarthy & Rasika Amarasiri & Xian Gong, 2026. "Translation Readiness Index: Measuring the Semantic Proximity of Research to Patented Science," Papers 2606.31102, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.31102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.31102
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitcham, Carl & Emeritus,, 2021. "Science policy and democracy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Jintao Zhan & Yubei Ma & Xinye Lv & Meng Xu & Mingyang Zhang, 2019. "Science or prejudice," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(1), pages 90-107, October.
    3. ., 2019. "Science and ideology," Chapters, in: Global Political Economy, chapter 2, pages 5-31, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. ., 2019. "The science of robots," Chapters, in: The Robot Revolution, chapter 4, pages 52-62, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Lutz Bornmann, 2013. "What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(2), pages 217-233, February.
    6. Shouhuai Xu & Moti Yung & Jingguo Wang, 2021. "Seeking Foundations for the Science of Cyber Security," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 263-267, April.
    7. Abhay S. D. Rajput & Sangeeta Sharma, 2021. "India: draft science policy calls for public engagement," Nature, Nature, vol. 592(7852), pages 26-26, April.
    8. Jaffe, Adam B, 1989. "Real Effects of Academic Research," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(5), pages 957-970, December.
    9. Xian Gong & Paul X. McCarthy & Colin Griffith & Claire McFarland & Marian-Andrei Rizoiu, 2025. "Cosmos 1.0: a multidimensional map of the emerging technology frontier," Papers 2505.10591, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    10. Jintao Zhan & Yubei Ma & Xinye Lv & Meng Xu & Mingyang Zhang, 2019. "Science or prejudice," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(1), pages 90-107, October.
    11. Stephen J. Kline & Nathan Rosenberg, 2009. "An Overview of Innovation," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Studies On Science And The Innovation Process Selected Works of Nathan Rosenberg, chapter 9, pages 173-203, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Manuel Trajtenberg, 1990. "A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 21(1), pages 172-187, Spring.
    13. Joshua Ettinger & Friederike E. L. Otto & E. Lisa F. Schipper, 2021. "Storytelling can be a powerful tool for science," Nature, Nature, vol. 589(7842), pages 352-352, January.
    14. Ashish Arora & Sharon Belenzon & Larisa C. Cioaca & Lia Sheer & Hansen Zhang, 2023. "The Effect of Public Science on Corporate R&D," NBER Working Papers 31899, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Lisa Mandle & Analisa Shields-Estrada & Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer & Matthew G. E. Mitchell & Leah L. Bremer & Jesse D. Gourevitch & Peter Hawthorne & Justin A. Johnson & Brian E. Robinson & Jeffrey R. Sm, 2021. "Increasing decision relevance of ecosystem service science," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(2), pages 161-169, February.
    16. Jonathan Grant & Liz Green & Barbara Mason, 2003. "Basic research and health: a reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical science," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 217-224, December.
    17. Perkmann, Markus & Tartari, Valentina & McKelvey, Maureen & Autio, Erkko & Broström, Anders & D’Este, Pablo & Fini, Riccardo & Geuna, Aldo & Grimaldi, Rosa & Hughes, Alan & Krabel, Stefan & Kitson, Mi, 2013. "Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 423-442.
    18. Paul Wouters & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Vincent Larivière & Marie E. McVeigh & Bernd Pulverer & Sarah de Rijcke & Ludo Waltman, 2019. "Rethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal," Nature, Nature, vol. 569(7758), pages 621-623, May.
    19. Geuna, Aldo & Nesta, Lionel J.J., 2006. "University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 790-807, July.
    20. Bronwyn H. Hall & Adam Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg, 2005. "Market Value and Patent Citations," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 36(1), pages 16-38, Spring.
    21. Jean J. Wang & Sarah X. Shao & Fred Y. Ye, 2021. "Identifying 'seed' papers in sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6001-6011, July.
    22. Shalabh, 2021. "Statistical inference via data science," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(3), pages 1155-1155, July.
    23. Mark A. Bradford & Chelsea J. Carey & Lesley Atwood & Deborah Bossio & Eli P. Fenichel & Sasha Gennet & Joseph Fargione & Jonathan R. B. Fisher & Emma Fuller & Daniel A. Kane & Johannes Lehmann & Emil, 2019. "Soil carbon science for policy and practice," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(12), pages 1070-1072, December.
    24. Tom C. Russ & Eva Woelbert & Katrina A. S. Davis & Jonathan D. Hafferty & Zina Ibrahim & Becky Inkster & Ann John & William Lee & Margaret Maxwell & Andrew M. McIntosh & Rob Stewart, 2019. "How data science can advance mental health research," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(1), pages 24-32, January.
    25. Markman, Gideon D. & Phan, Phillip H. & Balkin, David B. & Gianiodis, Peter T., 2005. "Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 241-263, March.
    26. Auriel M V Fournier & Angus J Holford & Alexander L Bond & Margaret A Leighton, 2019. "Unpaid work and access to science professions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, June.
    27. Reinhilde Veugelers, 2014. "The Contribution of Academic Research to Innovation and Growth. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 71," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 50856.
    28. ., 2019. "Science and technology innovation," Chapters, in: Energy Innovation for the Twenty-First Century, chapter 4, pages 81-111, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    29. Roger Masclans & Sharique Hasan & Wesley M. Cohen, 2025. "Measuring the commercial potential of science," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(9), pages 2199-2236, September.
    30. Lee Fleming & Olav Sorenson, 2004. "Science as a map in technological search," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(8‐9), pages 909-928, August.
    31. repec:fth:harver:1473 is not listed on IDEAS
    32. Jeannette Colyvas & Michael Crow & Annetine Gelijns & Roberto Mazzoleni & Richard R. Nelson & Nathan Rosenberg & Bhaven N. Sampat, 2002. "How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 61-72, January.
    33. Matt Marx & Aaron Fuegi, 2020. "Reliance on science: Worldwide front‐page patent citations to scientific articles," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(9), pages 1572-1594, September.
    34. Piotr W?? & Dorota BIELI?SKA-W?? & Agnieszka BIELI?SKA & Joanna CIESZY?SKA & MIKO?AJ Majkowicz, 2019. "Similarity Maps in Various Areas of Science," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 9811212, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    35. Adam B. Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg & Rebecca Henderson, 1993. "Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 108(3), pages 577-598.
    36. Sanjay K. Arora & Alan L. Porter & Jan Youtie & Philip Shapira, 2013. "Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(1), pages 351-370, April.
    37. Aqsa Saeed & Shaheera Qureshi & Tahira & Waqas Manzoor Bhutta, 2021. "Applications of Nanobiotechnology in Plant Sciences," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 35(1), pages 27236-27240, April.
    38. Wesley M. Cohen & Richard R. Nelson & John P. Walsh, 2003. "Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D," Chapters, in: Aldo Geuna & Ammon J. Salter & W. Edward Steinmueller (ed.), Science and Innovation, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    39. Narin, Francis & Hamilton, Kimberly S. & Olivastro, Dominic, 1997. "The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 317-330, October.
    40. Harhoff, Dietmar & Scherer, Frederic M. & Vopel, Katrin, 2004. "Erratum to "Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights" [Research Policy 32 (2003) 1343-1363]," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 363-364, March.
    41. Balconi, Margherita & Breschi, Stefano & Lissoni, Francesco, 2004. "Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 127-145, January.
    42. Furman, Jeffrey L. & Porter, Michael E. & Stern, Scott, 2002. "The determinants of national innovative capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 899-933, August.
    43. Richard R. Nelson, 1959. "The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67(3), pages 297-297.
    44. Johan S. G. Chu & James A. Evans, 2021. "Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118(41), pages 2021636118-, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Xian & Du, Haixing & Bu, Yi & Ai, Mingshu & Huang, Junjie & Jia, Tao, 2025. "Innovation lineage structure: A graph structure in publications of scholars and its association with disruptiveness," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4).
    2. Martin Baily & David Byrne & Aidan Kane & Paul Soto, 2025. "Generative AI at the Crossroads: Light Bulb, Dynamo, or Microscope?," Papers 2505.14588, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    3. Hottenrott, Hanna & Schaper, Thomas & Schwierzy, Julian, 2026. "Clusters of excellence and science spillovers to industry: Evidence from additive manufacturing," ZEW Discussion Papers 26-013, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Wang, Fang, 2024. "Does the recombination of distant scientific knowledge generate valuable inventions? An analysis of pharmaceutical patents," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    5. Deng Cheng & Zhang Xue & Yang Zhibo & Zhang Mingze, 2025. "Impact of interdisciplinarity on disruptive innovation: the moderating role of collaboration pattern and collaboration size," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(4), pages 2379-2401, April.
    6. Liyin Zhang & Yuchen Qian & Chao Ma & Jiang Li, 2023. "Continued collaboration shortens the transition period of scientists who move to another institution," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1765-1784, March.
    7. Zsolt Kohus & Gergely Ferenc Lendvai & Dóra Vizvári & Márton Demeter & Sándor Soós & Beáta Bavalicsné Kerekes & Eszter Lukács, 2025. "Exploring the collaboration networks between highly cited researchers in highly cited papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(11), pages 6513-6540, November.
    8. Leten, Bart & Landoni, Paolo & Van Looy, Bart, 2014. "Science or graduates: How do firms benefit from the proximity of universities?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1398-1412.
    9. Xinhua Chai & Qiang Wu, 2025. "What kind of research network configurations lead to high academic productivity for young management scholars?—A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 2705-2748, May.
    10. Angelo Salatino & Francesco Osborne & Diego Reforgiato Recupero & Simone Angioni & Enrico Motta, 2026. "Does Diversity of Expertise Drive Citation Impact? Evidence from Computer Science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 131(2), pages 1119-1146, February.
    11. Bornmann, Lutz & Haunschild, Robin, 2024. "The Prize Winner Index (PWI): A proposal for an indicator based on scientific prizes," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4).
    12. Michael Färber & Melissa Coutinho & Shuzhou Yuan, 2023. "Biases in scholarly recommender systems: impact, prevalence, and mitigation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 2703-2736, May.
    13. Jing Liu & David A. Hyman, 2025. "Network Analysis of Innovation in Legal Scholarship: Law & Economics, Law & Society, and Empirical Legal Studies," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 599-619, December.
    14. Dornbusch, Friedrich & Neuhäusler, Peter, 2015. "Composition of inventor teams and technological progress – The role of collaboration between academia and industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1360-1375.
    15. Martin Neil Baily & David M. Byrne & Aidan T. Kane & Paul E. Soto, 2025. "Generative AI at the Crossroads: Light Bulb, Dynamo, or Microscope?," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2025-053, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    16. Baicun Li & Aruhan Bai, 2025. "The influence of grant renewal on research content: evidence from NIH-funded PIs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 2617-2638, May.
    17. Malte Hückstädt, 2023. "Ten reasons why research collaborations succeed—a random forest approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1923-1950, March.
    18. Cinzia Daraio & Simone Di Leo & Loet Leydesdorff, 2022. "Using the Leiden Rankings as a Heuristics: Evidence from Italian universities in the European landscape," LEM Papers Series 2022/08, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    19. Alex J. Yang & Hongcun Gong & Yuhao Wang & Chao Zhang & Sanhong Deng, 2024. "Rescaling the disruption index reveals the universality of disruption distributions in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(1), pages 561-580, January.
    20. Rainer Frietsch & Sonia Gruber & Lutz Bornmann, 2025. "The definition of highly cited researchers: the effect of different approaches on the empirical outcome," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(2), pages 881-907, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.31102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.