IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2602.24215.html

Empirical Challenges with Peers-of-Peers Instruments in the Linear-In-Means Model

Author

Listed:
  • Nathan Canen
  • Shantanu Chadha

Abstract

In the linear-in-means model, endogeneity arises naturally due to the reflection problem. A common solution is to use Instrumental Variables (IVs) based on higher-order network links, such as using friends-of-friends' characteristics. We first show that such instruments are unlikely to work well in many applied settings: in very sparse or very dense networks, friends-of-friends may be similar to the original links. This implies that the IVs may be weak or their first stage estimand may be undefined. For a class of random graphs, we use random graph theory and characterize regimes where such instruments perform well, and when they would not. We prove how weak-IV robust inference can be adapted to this environment, and how scaling the network can help. We provide extensive Monte Carlo simulations and revisit empirical applications, showing the prevalence of such issues in empirical practice, and how our results restore valid inference.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathan Canen & Shantanu Chadha, 2026. "Empirical Challenges with Peers-of-Peers Instruments in the Linear-In-Means Model," Papers 2602.24215, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.24215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.24215
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.24215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.