IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2602.19689.html

Integrating Predictive Models into Two-Sided Recommendations: A Matching-Theoretic Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kazuki Sekiya
  • Suguru Otani
  • Yuki Komatsu
  • Sachio Ohkawa
  • Shunya Noda

Abstract

Two-sided platforms must recommend users to users, where matches (termed \emph{dates} in this paper) require mutual interest and activity on both sides. Naive ranking by predicted dating probabilities concentrates exposure on a small subset of highly responsive users, generating congestion and overstating efficiency. We model recommendation as a many-to-many matching problem and design integrators that map predicted login, like, and reciprocation probabilities into recommendations under attention constraints. We introduce \emph{effective dates}, a congestion-adjusted metric that discounts matches involving overloaded receivers. We then propose \emph{exposure-constrained deferred acceptance} (ECDA), which limits receiver exposure in terms of expected likes or dates rather than headcount. Using production-grade predictions from a large Japanese dating platform, we show in calibrated simulations that ECDA increases effective dates and receiver-side dating probability despite reducing total dates. A large-scale regional field experiment confirms these effects in practice, indicating that exposure control improves equity and early-stage matching efficiency without harming downstream engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazuki Sekiya & Suguru Otani & Yuki Komatsu & Sachio Ohkawa & Shunya Noda, 2026. "Integrating Predictive Models into Two-Sided Recommendations: A Matching-Theoretic Approach," Papers 2602.19689, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.19689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.19689
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eugene Choo & Aloysius Siow, 2006. "Who Marries Whom and Why," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 114(1), pages 175-201, February.
    2. Victor Alfonso Naya & Guillaume Bied & Philippe Caillou & Bruno Crépon & Christophe Gaillac & Elia Pérennes & Michèle Sebag, 2021. "Designing labor market recommender systems: the importance of job seeker preferences and competition," Post-Print hal-03540319, HAL.
    3. Kuan‐Ming Chen & Yu‐Wei Hsieh & Ming‐Jen Lin, 2023. "Reducing Recommendation Inequality Via Two‐Sided Matching: A Field Experiment Of Online Dating," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 64(3), pages 1201-1221, August.
    4. Kässi, Otto & Lehdonvirta, Vili, 2018. "Online labour index: Measuring the online gig economy for policy and research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 241-248.
    5. Suguru Otani, 2025. "Nonparametric Estimation of Matching Efficiency and Elasticity in a Marriage Agency Platform: 2014--2025," Papers 2505.00607, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    6. Alfred Galichon & Bernard Salanié, 2022. "Cupid’s Invisible Hand: Social Surplus and Identification in Matching Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(5), pages 2600-2629.
    7. Hanna Halaburda & Mikołaj Jan Piskorski & Pınar Yıldırım, 2018. "Competing by Restricting Choice: The Case of Matching Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3574-3594, August.
    8. Yash Kanoria & Daniela Saban, 2021. "Facilitating the Search for Partners on Matching Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 5990-6029, October.
    9. Ignacio Rios & Daniela Saban & Fanyin Zheng, 2023. "Improving Match Rates in Dating Markets Through Assortment Optimization," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1304-1323, July.
    10. Nick Arnosti & Ramesh Johari & Yash Kanoria, 2021. "Managing Congestion in Matching Markets," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 620-636, May.
    11. Peng Shi, 2022. "Optimal Priority-Based Allocation Mechanisms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 171-188, January.
    12. Otani, Suguru, 2025. "Nonparametric estimation of matching efficiency and elasticity in a marriage agency platform: 2014–2025," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    13. Giovanni Compiani & Gregory Lewis & Sida Peng & Peichun Wang, 2024. "Online Search and Optimal Product Rankings: An Empirical Framework," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 615-636, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaehwuen Jung & Hyungsoo Lim & Dongwon Lee & Chul Kim, 2022. "The Secret to Finding a Match: A Field Experiment on Choice Capacity Design in an Online Dating Platform," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1248-1263, December.
    2. Ludwig Dierks & Nils Olberg & Sven Seuken & Vincent W. Slaugh & M. Utku Ünver, 2025. "Search and Matching for Adoption from Foster Care," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 1093, Boston College Department of Economics.
    3. Ali Aouad & Daniela Saban, 2023. "Online Assortment Optimization for Two-Sided Matching Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2069-2087, April.
    4. Peng Shi, 2023. "Optimal Matchmaking Strategy in Two-Sided Marketplaces," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1323-1340, March.
    5. Chihiro Inoue & Yusuke Ishihata & Suguru Otani, 2026. "Marital Sorting on Pre-Marital Preferences for Household Behavior," Papers 2603.25372, arXiv.org.
    6. Arnaud Dupuy & Alfred Galichon, 2012. "Personality traits and the marriage market," SciencePo Working papers hal-01070393, HAL.
    7. Yeon-Koo Che, 2025. "Dynamic Market Design," Papers 2601.00155, arXiv.org.
    8. Nicole Immorlica & Brendan Lucier & Vahideh Manshadi & Alexander Wei, 2023. "Designing Approximately Optimal Search on Matching Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(8), pages 4609-4626, August.
    9. Gunhaeng Lee, 2023. "Tailored recommendations on a matching platform," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(4), pages 883-917, November.
    10. T. Tony Ke & Monic Sun & Baojun Jiang, 2024. "Peer-to-Peer Markets with Bilateral Ratings," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 1081-1101, September.
    11. Arnaud Dupuy & Alfred Galichon, 2012. "Personality traits and the marriage market," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-01070393, HAL.
    12. Alfred Galichon & Antoine Jacquet & Georgy Salakhutdinov, 2025. "Transferable Utility Matching Beyond Logit: Computation and Estimation with General Heterogeneity," Papers 2511.23116, arXiv.org.
    13. Jessica Fong, 2024. "Effects of Market Size and Competition in Two-Sided Markets: Evidence from Online Dating," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 971-985, September.
    14. Goussé, Marion & Jacquemet, Nicolas & Robin, Jean-Marc, 2017. "Household labour supply and the marriage market in the UK, 1991-2008," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 131-149.
    15. Hongchang Wang & Benjamin Williams & Karen Xie & Wei Chen, 2024. "Quality Differentiation and Matching Performance in Peer-to-Peer Markets: Evidence from Airbnb Plus," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(7), pages 4260-4282, July.
    16. Pęski, Marcin, 2017. "Large roommate problem with non-transferable random utility," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 432-471.
    17. Behnaz Bojd & Hema Yoganarasimhan, 2022. "Star-Cursed Lovers: Role of Popularity Information in Online Dating," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 73-92, January.
    18. Taehoon Kim & Jacob Schwartz & Kyungchul Song & Yoon-Jae Whang, 2019. "Monte Carlo Inference on Two-Sided Matching Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Esben Scrivers Andersen, 2024. "Note on solving one-to-one matching models with linear transferable utility," Papers 2409.05518, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2025.
    20. Angelos Aveklouris & Amber L. Puha & Amy R. Ward, 2024. "A fluid approximation for a matching model with general reneging distributions," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 106(3), pages 199-238, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.19689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.