IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2504.12413.html

Digital Adoption and Cyber Security: An Analysis of Canadian Businesses

Author

Listed:
  • Joann Jasiak
  • Peter MacKenzie
  • Purevdorj Tuvaandorj

Abstract

This paper examines how Canadian firms balance the benefits of technology adoption against the rising risk of cyber security breaches. We merge data from the 2021 Canadian Survey of Digital Technology and Internet Use and the 2021 Canadian Survey of Cyber Security and Cybercrime to investigate the trade-off firms face when pursuing digitalization to enhance productivity and efficiency, balanced against the potential increase in cyber security risk. The analysis explores the extent of digital technology adoption, differences across industries, the subsequent associations with efficiency, and associated cyber security vulnerabilities. We build aggregate variables, such as the Business Digital Usage Score and a cyber security incidence variable to quantify each firm's digital engagement and cyber security risk. A survey-weight-adjusted Lasso estimator is employed, and a debiasing method for high-dimensional logit models is introduced to identify the predictors of technological efficiency and cyber risk. The analysis reveals a digital divide linked to firm size, industry, and workforce composition. While rapid expansion of tools such as cloud services or artificial intelligence can raise efficiency, it simultaneously heightens exposure to cyber threats, particularly among larger enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Joann Jasiak & Peter MacKenzie & Purevdorj Tuvaandorj, 2025. "Digital Adoption and Cyber Security: An Analysis of Canadian Businesses," Papers 2504.12413, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2504.12413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.12413
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Griffiths & Xiaohui Zhang & Xueyan Zhao, 2014. "Estimation and efficiency measurement in stochastic production frontiers with ordinal outcomes," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 67-84, August.
    2. Lu Xia & Bin Nan & Yi Li, 2023. "Debiased lasso for generalized linear models with a diverging number of covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 344-357, March.
    3. Danny Leung & Césaire Meh & Yaz Terajima, 2008. "Firm Size and Productivity," Staff Working Papers 08-45, Bank of Canada.
    4. Ritsu Kitagawa & Sachiko Kuroda & Hiroko Okudaira & Hideo Owan, 2021. "Working from home and productivity under the COVID-19 pandemic: Using survey data of four manufacturing firms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Kumbhakar,Subal C. & Wang,Hung-Jen & Horncastle,Alan P., 2015. "A Practitioner's Guide to Stochastic Frontier Analysis Using Stata," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107609464.
    6. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 2001. "Asymptotic Properties Of Weighted M-Estimators For Standard Stratified Samples," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 451-470, April.
    7. Danny Leung & Césaire Meh & Yaz Terajima, 2008. "Productivity in Canada: Does Firm Size Matter?," Bank of Canada Review, Bank of Canada, vol. 2008(Autumn), pages 7-16.
    8. Shih-Tang Hwu & Tsu-Tan Fu & Wen-Jen Tsay, 2021. "Estimation and efficiency evaluation of stochastic frontier models with interval dependent variables," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 33-44, August.
    9. Eduardo Fé & Richard Hofler, 2013. "Count data stochastic frontier models, with an application to the patents–R&D relationship," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 271-284, June.
    10. Balazs Aczel & Marton Kovacs & Tanja van der Lippe & Barnabas Szaszi, 2021. "Researchers working from home: Benefits and challenges," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, March.
    11. Eduardo Fé & Richard Hofler, 2020. "sfcount: Command for count-data stochastic frontiers and underreported and overreported counts," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 20(3), pages 532-547, September.
    12. Denis Chetverikov & Jesper Riis-Vestergaard Sørensen, 2025. "Selecting Penalty Parameters of High-Dimensional M-Estimators Using Bootstrapping after Cross Validation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 133(10), pages 3208-3248.
    13. Cun-Hui Zhang & Stephanie S. Zhang, 2014. "Confidence intervals for low dimensional parameters in high dimensional linear models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 76(1), pages 217-242, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mioara Chirita & Daniela-Ancuta Sarpe, 2025. "Rethinking Economic Risk in the Age of Digital Transformation and Sustainable Entrepreneurship," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 128-133.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cassey Lee, . "The Exporting and Productivity Nexus: Does Firm Size Matter?," Chapters, in: Chin Hee Hahn & Dionisius A. Narjoko (ed.), Globalization and Performance of Small and Large Firms, chapter 8, pages VIII-1 - , Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    2. Rouven E. Haschka & Helmut Herwartz, 2022. "Endogeneity in pharmaceutical knowledge generation: An instrument‐free copula approach for Poisson frontier models," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 942-960, November.
    3. James (Jim) C. MacGee & Joel Rodrigue, 2024. "The Distributional Origins of the Canada-US GDP and Labour Productivity Gaps," Staff Working Papers 24-49, Bank of Canada.
    4. Joann Jasiak & Purevdorj Tuvaandorj, 2023. "Penalized Likelihood Inference with Survey Data," Papers 2304.07855, arXiv.org.
    5. Ranasinghe, Ashantha, 2017. "Innovation, firm size and the Canada-U.S. productivity gap," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 46-58.
    6. Paulo Matos & Pedro Neves, 2020. "The Determinants of Total Factor Productivity in the Portuguese Quaternary Sector," GEE Papers 0149, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Apr 2020.
    7. Apeti, Ablam Estel & Ly, Alpha, 2024. "Power constraints and firm-level total factor productivity in developing countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    8. Mark Parsons, 2011. "Rewarding Innovation: Improving Federal Tax Support for Business R&D in Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 334, September.
    9. Machek Ondrej, 2012. "Data Issues In Total Factor Productivity Benchmarking: A Central European Perspective," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 219-225, December.
    10. Henderson, Heath & Follett, Lendie, 2020. "A Bayesian framework for estimating human capabilities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    11. Apeti,Ablam Estel & Ly,Alpha, 2023. "Power Constraints and Firm-Level Total Factor Productivity in Developing Countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10510, The World Bank.
    12. Hien Thu Pham & Shino Takayama, 2015. "Revisiting the Missing Middle: Production and Corruption," CEPA Working Papers Series WP022015, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    13. Zélity, Balázs, 2022. "The welfare effects of FDI: A quantitative analysis," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 293-320.
    14. Pierre St-Amant & David Tessier, 2018. "Firm Dynamics and Multifactor Productivity: An Empirical Exploration," Staff Working Papers 18-15, Bank of Canada.
    15. Hien Thu Pham & Shino Takayama, 2017. "Revisiting the “Missing Middle”: Productivity Analysis," Discussion Papers Series 580, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    16. Aleksandra Kordalska & Magdalena Olczyk, 2020. "What fosters firm-level labour productivity in Eastern European and Central Asian countries?," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 51(1), pages 91-120.
    17. Mutz, Rüdiger & Bornmann, Lutz & Daniel, Hans-Dieter, 2017. "Are there any frontiers of research performance? Efficiency measurement of funded research projects with the Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis for count data," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 613-628.
    18. Pål Børing, 2019. "The relationship between firm productivity, firm size and CSR objectives for innovations," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(3), pages 269-297, September.
    19. Kent Baker & Shantanu Dutta & Samir Saadi, 2011. "Corporate Finance Practices in Canada: Where Do We Stand?," Multinational Finance Journal, Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 15(3-4), pages 157-192, September.
    20. Mohammad Yousefian & Marc Bascompta & Lluís Sanmiquel & Carla Vintró & Nor Sidki-Rius, 2024. "Corporate social responsibility and total factor productivity: the case of European mining industry," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 37(1), pages 149-161, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2504.12413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.