IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1610.05697.html

"Butterfly Effect" vs Chaos in Energy Futures Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Loretta Mastroeni
  • Pierluigi Vellucci

Abstract

In this paper we test for the sensitive dependence on initial conditions (the so called "butterfly effect") of energy futures time series (heating oil, natural gas), and thus the determinism of those series. This paper is distinguished from previous studies in the following points: first, we reread existent works in the literature on energy markets, enlightening the role of \emph{butterfly effect} in chaos definition (introduced by Devaney), using this definition to prevent us from misleading results about ostensible chaoticity of the price series. Second, we test for the time series for sensitive dependence on initial conditions, introducing a coefficient that describes the determinism rate of the series and that represents its reliability level (in percentage). The introduction of this reliability level is motivated by the fact that time series generated from stochastic systems also might show sensitive dependence on initial conditions. According to this perspective, the maximum reliability level obtained here is too low to be able to ensure that there is strong evidence of sensitive The maximum reliability level obtained here was been $\simeq 56\% $, too low to ensure strong evidence of sensitive dependence on initial conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Loretta Mastroeni & Pierluigi Vellucci, 2016. ""Butterfly Effect" vs Chaos in Energy Futures Markets," Papers 1610.05697, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1610.05697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.05697
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simón Sosvilla-Rivero & Fernando Fernández-Rodriguez & Julián Andrada-Félix, 2005. "Testing chaotic dynamics via Lyapunov exponents," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(7), pages 911-930.
    2. repec:aen:journl:2006v27-04-a04 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Kyrtsou, Catherine & Malliaris, Anastasios G. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2009. "Energy sector pricing: On the role of neglected nonlinearity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 492-502, May.
    4. repec:aen:journl:1998v19-02-a10 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Gradojevic, Nikola & Gencay, Ramazan, 2008. "Overnight interest rates and aggregate market expectations," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 27-30, July.
    6. Apostolos Serletis & Periklis Gogas, 2007. "The North American Natural Gas Liquids Markets are Chaotic," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Quantitative And Empirical Analysis Of Energy Markets, chapter 17, pages 225-244, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Barkoulas, John T. & Chakraborty, Atreya & Ouandlous, Arav, 2012. "A metric and topological analysis of determinism in the crude oil spot market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 584-591.
    8. Brock, William A. & Sayers, Chera L., 1988. "Is the business cycle characterized by deterministic chaos?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 71-90, July.
    9. repec:aen:journl:1999v20-01-a05 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Gençay, Ramazan & Gradojevic, Nikola, 2010. "Crash of '87 -- Was it expected?: Aggregate market fears and long-range dependence," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 270-282, March.
    11. Adrangi, Bahram & Chatrath, Arjun & Dhanda, Kanwalroop Kathy & Raffiee, Kambiz, 2001. "Chaos in oil prices? Evidence from futures markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 405-425, July.
    12. Benedetto, F. & Giunta, G. & Mastroeni, L., 2016. "On the predictability of energy commodity markets by an entropy-based computational method," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 302-312.
    13. repec:aen:journl:2007v28-03-a02 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Panas, Epaminondas & Ninni, Vassilia, 2000. "Are oil markets chaotic? A non-linear dynamic analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 549-568, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Loretta Mastroeni & Pierluigi Vellucci, 2016. "“Butterfly Effect" vs Chaos in Energy Futures Markets," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0209, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    2. Loretta Mastroeni & Pierluigi Vellucci, 2016. ""Chaos" in energy and commodity markets: a controversial matter," Papers 1611.07432, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2017.
    3. Loretta Mastroeni & Pierluigi Vellucci, 2017. "“Chaos” In Energy And Commodity Markets: A Controversial Matter," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0218, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    4. Mastroeni, Loretta & Vellucci, Pierluigi & Naldi, Maurizio, 2019. "A reappraisal of the chaotic paradigm for energy commodity prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 167-178.
    5. Marisa Faggini, 2011. "Chaotic Time Series Analysis in Economics: Balance and Perspectives," Working papers 25, Former Department of Economics and Public Finance "G. Prato", University of Torino.
    6. Gu, Rongbao & Zhang, Bing, 2016. "Is efficiency of crude oil market affected by multifractality? Evidence from the WTI crude oil market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 151-158.
    7. Marisa Faggini & Bruna Bruno & Anna Parziale, 2019. "Does Chaos Matter in Financial Time Series Analysis?," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(4), pages 18-24.
    8. Lu-Tao Zhao & Guan-Rong Zeng & Ling-Yun He & Ya Meng, 2020. "Forecasting Short-Term Oil Price with a Generalised Pattern Matching Model Based on Empirical Genetic Algorithm," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 1151-1169, April.
    9. Alvarez-Ramirez, Jose & Alvarez, Jesus & Rodriguez, Eduardo, 2008. "Short-term predictability of crude oil markets: A detrended fluctuation analysis approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 2645-2656, September.
    10. Nikola Gradojevic & Marko Caric, 2017. "Predicting Systemic Risk with Entropic Indicators," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 16-25, January.
    11. Elena Olmedo, 2014. "Forecasting Spanish Unemployment Using Near Neighbour and Neural Net Techniques," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 43(2), pages 183-197, February.
    12. He, Ling-Yun & Fan, Ying & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2009. "Impact of speculator's expectations of returns and time scales of investment on crude oil price behaviors," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 77-84, January.
    13. Matilla-García, Mariano & Marín, Manuel Ruiz, 2010. "A new test for chaos and determinism based on symbolic dynamics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 600-614, December.
    14. Kristoufek, Ladislav, 2019. "Are the crude oil markets really becoming more efficient over time? Some new evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 253-263.
    15. Aghababa, Hajar & Barnett, William A., 2016. "Dynamic structure of the spot price of crude oil: does time aggregation matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 227-237.
    16. Bahram Adrangi & Richard D. Gritta & Kambiz Raffiee, 2013. "Volatility Spillovers and Nonlinear Dynamics between Jet Fuel Prices and Air Carrier Revenue Passenger Miles in the US," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 3, pages 01-18, August.
    17. Xiaotao Zhang & Zihui Xia & Feng He & Jing Hao, 2025. "Forecasting crude oil prices with alternative data and a deep learning approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 345(2), pages 1165-1191, February.
    18. Bekiros, Stelios & Jlassi, Mouna & Lucey, Brian & Naoui, Kamel & Uddin, Gazi Salah, 2017. "Herding behavior, market sentiment and volatility: Will the bubble resume?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 107-131.
    19. Bahram Adrangi & Mary E. Allender & Kambiz Raffiee, 2011. "Exchange Rates and Inflation Rates: Exploring Nonlinear Relationships," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 1, pages 1-16, April.
    20. Marcos Álvarez-Díaz, 2020. "Is it possible to accurately forecast the evolution of Brent crude oil prices? An answer based on parametric and nonparametric forecasting methods," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1285-1305, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1610.05697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.