The Equivalence of Panel Data Estimators under Orthogonal Experimental Design
This paper demonstrates the equivalence between pooled OLS, Fixed Effects, and Random Effects estimates when applied to data generated from an orthogonal experimental design under certain conditions. We show that the point estimates of the treatment effects are identical between these three panel data estimators but that the estimated standard errors differ. Specifically, the estimated variance covariance matrices are identical between FE and RE but differ from that of OLS. Despite the equivalence it is meaningful to test for OLS vs FE/RE because the error distributional assumptions are different.
|Date of creation:||2005|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Thelma C. Raley Hall, Boone, North Carolina 28608|
Web page: http://economics.appstate.edu/
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Oaxaca, Ronald L. & Geisler, Iris, 2003. "Fixed effects models with time invariant variables: a theoretical note," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 373-377, September.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apl:wpaper:05-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (O. Ashton Morgan)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.