IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/anc/wpaper/218.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Impact Analysis of SAPARD in Rural Areas by Alternative Methods of Regionalization

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea BONFIGLIO

    ([n.a.])

  • Francesco CHELLI

    (Universita' Politecnica delle Marche, Dipartimento di Economia)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to evaluate sensitivity of policy impact to the use of different methods of regionalization based on I-O approach. Policy impact is that coming from the application of the SAPARD pre-accession instrument for the period 2000-06 in three rural regions. Towards this aim, 8 alternative methods are applied to derive 8 corresponding I-O matrices for every region considered, from which impacts are calculated. The main results from this analysis are the following ones. First, results in terms of impact are influenced by the method employed, although variability among methods is contained. Second, methods would not seem to be affected by territorial dimension, since structure of differences among methods is generally the same in all the regions considered and for any kind of impact es-timated.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea BONFIGLIO & Francesco CHELLI, 2004. "An Impact Analysis of SAPARD in Rural Areas by Alternative Methods of Regionalization," Working Papers 218, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    • Handle: RePEc:anc:wpaper:218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://docs.dises.univpm.it/web/quaderni/pdf/218.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2004
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Harris & Aying Liu, 1998. "Input-Output Modelling of the Urban and Regional Economy: The Importance of External Trade," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(9), pages 851-862.
    2. Greenstreet, David, 1989. "A conceptual framework for construction of hybrid regional input-output models," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 283-289.
    3. A. T. Flegg & C. D. Webber, 1997. "On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input-Output Tables: Reply," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(8), pages 795-805.
    4. Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, 1985. "Regional Input-Output Analysis," Book Chapters, in: Grant I. Thrall (ed.),Scientific Geography Series, pages 52, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    5. Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, 1985. "Regional Input-Output Analysis," Wholbk, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, number 11 edited by Grant I. Thrall, November-.
    6. Steven Brand, 1997. "On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input-Output Tables: A Comment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(8), pages 791-794.
    7. A. T. Flegg & C. D. Webber, 2000. "Regional Size, Regional Specialization and the FLQ Formula," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 563-569.
    8. Oliver Fritz & Raimund Kurzmann & Gerold Zakarias & Gerhard Streicher, 2003. "Constructing Regional Input-Output Tables for Austria," Austrian Economic Quarterly, WIFO, vol. 8(1), pages 23-29, April.
    9. Randall Jackson, 1998. "Regionalizing National Commodity-by-Industry Accounts," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 223-238.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefania BUSSOLETTI & Roberto ESPOSTI, 2004. "Regional Convergence, Structural Funds and the Role of Agricolture in the EU. A Panel-Data Approach," Working Papers 220, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    2. Renato BALDUCCI, 2005. "Public Expenditure and Economic Growth. A critical extension of Barro's (1990) model," Working Papers 240, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    3. Roberto ESPOSTI & Pierpaolo PIERANI, 2005. "Price, Private Demand and Optimal Provision of Public R&D in Italian Agriculture," Working Papers 238, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristinn Hermannsson, 2016. "Beyond Intermediates: The Role of Consumption and Commuting in the Construction of Local Input–Output Tables," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 315-339, July.
    2. Andrea Bonfiglio & Francesco Chelli, 2008. "Assessing the Behaviour of Non-Survey Methods for Constructing Regional Input-Output Tables through a Monte Carlo Simulation," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 243-258.
    3. Gunnar Lindberg, 2011. "On the appropriate use of (input-output) coefficients to generate non-survey regional input-output tables: Implications for the determination of output multipliers," ERSA conference papers ersa10p800, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Johannes Többen & Tobias Heinrich Kronenberg, 2015. "Construction Of Multi-Regional Input--Output Tables Using The Charm Method," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 487-507, December.
    5. Tobias Kronenberg, 2009. "Construction of Regional Input-Output Tables Using Nonsurvey Methods," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 32(1), pages 40-64, January.
    6. Timo Tohmo, 2004. "New Developments in the Use of Location Quotients to Estimate Regional Input-Output Coefficients and Multipliers," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 43-54.
    7. Geoff Riddington & Hervey Gibson & John Anderson, 2006. "Comparison of Gravity Model, Survey and Location Quotient-based Local Area Tables and Multipliers," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(9), pages 1069-1081.
    8. Tony Flegg & Leonardo J. Mastronardi & Carlos A. Romero, 2015. "Evaluating the FLQ and AFLQ formulae for estimating regional input coefficients: empirical evidence for the province of C¨®rdoba, Argentina," Working Papers 20151508, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    9. Anthony T. Flegg & Leonardo J. Mastronardi & Carlos A. Romero, 2014. "Empirical evidence on the use of the FLQ formula for regionalizing national input-output tables: The case of the Province of C¨®rdoba, Argentina," Working Papers 20141406, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    10. Anthony T. Flegg & Leonardo J. Mastronardi & Carlos A. Romero, 2016. "Evaluating the FLQ and AFLQ formulae for estimating regional input coefficients: empirical evidence for the province of Córdoba, Argentina," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 21-37, March.
    11. Anthony T. Flegg & Yongming Huang & Timo Tohmo, 2015. "Using Charm to Adjust for Cross-Hauling: The Case of the Province of Hubei, China," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 391-413, September.
    12. Georgios Lampiris & Christos Karelakis & Efstratios Loizou, 2020. "Comparison of non-survey techniques for constructing regional input–output tables," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 225-266, November.
    13. Szabó, Norbert, 2015. "Methods for regionalizing input-output tables," MPRA Paper 73947, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Anthony Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2011. "Regional Input-Output Tables and the FLQ Formula: A Case Study of Finland," ERSA conference papers ersa11p334, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Kronenberg, Tobias & Többen, Johannes, 2011. "Regional input-output modelling in Germany: The case of North Rhine-Westphalia," MPRA Paper 35494, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Yu, Yang & Hubacek, Klaus & Feng, Kuishuang & Guan, Dabo, 2010. "Assessing regional and global water footprints for the UK," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1140-1147, March.
    17. Lankhuizen, Maureen & Boonstra, Harm Jan & de Blois, Chris, 2020. "Unpacking freight – Identifying conditions driving regional freight transport in statistics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 415-435.
    18. Hermannsson, Kristinn & Lisenkova, Katerina & McGregor, Peter G. & Swales, J. Kim, 2010. "Policy Scepticism and the Impact of Northern Irish Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) on their Host Region: Accounting for Regional Budget Constraints," SIRE Discussion Papers 2010-78, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    19. Alan T. Murray, 2010. "Quantitative Geography," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 143-163, February.
    20. Argyrios D. Kolokontes & Chrysovalantis Karafillis & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2008. "Argyrios D. Kolokontes, Chrysovalantis Karafillis, Fotios Chatzitheodoridis - Peculiarities and usefulness of multipliers, elasticities and location quotients for the regional development planning: an," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 2(2), pages 118-133, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    I-O approach; SAPARD; policy impact sensitivity anlysis; regionalization methods;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • R15 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Econometric and Input-Output Models; Other Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:anc:wpaper:218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maurizio Mariotti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deancit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.