IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input-Output Tables: Reply

Listed author(s):
  • A. T. Flegg
  • C. D. Webber
Registered author(s):

    FLEGG A. T. and WEBBER C. D. (1997) On the appropriate use of location quotients in generating regional input-output tables: reply, Reg. Studies 31, 795-805. In this paper, we respond to Steven Brand's criticisms of our FLQ formula for adjusting national input-output tables to take account of interregional trade. We argue that the FLQ's cross-industry foundations are theoretically appropriate and that our approach provides a rigorous basis for testing the traditional assumption of identical regional and national technology. We provide a more detailed rationale for the role of regional size in the FLQ formula and also present a revised version of this formula. Notwithstanding Brand's criticisms, we aim to demonstrate that the FLQ remains a very useful addition to the regional analyst's tool box. FLEGG A. T. et WEBBER C. D. (1997) Sur l'emploi approprie des quotients de localisation pour construire des tableaux d'echanges intersectoriels regionaux: une reponse, Reg. Studies 31, 795-805. Cet article cherche a repondre aux critiques de Steven Brand sur notre formule FLQ qui sert a ajuster les tableaux d'echanges intersectoriels nationaux pour tenir compte des echanges interregionaux. Pour nous, les bases interindstrielles du FLQ sont en principe appropriees et notre approche fournit une base rigoureuse pour tester la supposition classique d'une technologie regionale et nationale identiques. Nous fournissons une explication plus detaillee du role de la taille de la region dans la formule FLQ et presentons une version revisee de cette formule. En depit des critiques de Brand, nous cherchons a demontrer que le FLQ represente toujours un outil supplementaire tres utile pour l'analyste regional. FLEGG A. T. und WEBBER C. D.(1997) Zur angemessenen Benutzung von Standortquotienten (FLQ) bei der Aufstellung regionaler Aufwand-Ertragstabellen: Entgegnung, Reg. Studies 31, 795-805. Der vorliegende Aufsatz ist eine Entgegnung auf Steven Brands Kritik an der FLQ Formel der oben genannten Autoren zur Anpassung von Landesaufwand- und Ertragstabellen unter Beru¨cksichtigung des interregionalen Handels. Die Autoren treten dafu¨r ein, dass FLQs Industrie u¨berschreitende Gru¨ndungen theoretisch geeignet sind, und dass ihr Ansatz eine wissenschaftlich rigorose Basis fu¨r die Pru¨fung der traditionellen Annahme darstellt, dass Regionaltechnologie mit Technologie auf Landesebene identisch ist. Sie sorgen fu¨r eine eingehendere rationale Erkla¨rung der Rolle der Regionalgro¨sse in der FLQ Formel und legen daru¨berhinaus eine u¨berarbeitete Version dieser Formel vor. Ungeachtet Brands Kritik beabsichtigen sie, aufzuzeigen, dass die FLQ ein ho¨chst nu¨tzliches, zusa¨tzliches Gera¨t in der Ausru¨stung des Regionalanalysten bildet.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

    Volume (Year): 31 (1997)
    Issue (Month): 8 ()
    Pages: 795-805

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:31:y:1997:i:8:p:795-805
    DOI: 10.1080/713693401
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:31:y:1997:i:8:p:795-805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.