IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/utaeer/305343.html

Paycheck Protection Program Participation in Tennessee's Green Industry: April 3-June 30, 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Rihn, Alicia
  • Jensen, Kimberly L.

Abstract

On March 11, 2020, the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2020) and began to emerge in the United States. On March 13, 2020, President Trump issued a proclamation declaring that the COVID-19 outbreak in the U.S. was a national emergency (Whitehouse, 2020). As COVID-19 evidenced community spread, actions were taken by federal, state and local governments to help limit the spread. Some of these actions included recommendations or orders to stay at home, temporary closures or limitations of services by certain types of businesses (e.g., dine-in restaurants and bars), limiting meetings of organizations and institutions, travel restrictions and other actions. Tennessee Governor Lee issued Executive Order No. 22 (EO 22) with a safer-at-home directive, except for engagement in essential activities or services (State of Tennessee, 2020). Under EO 22, nursery and greenhouse growers, wholesalers and retailers and garden centers were deemed essential services, which meant that they could remain open (State of Tennessee, 2020). However, the COVID-19 pandemic and associated economic downturn impacted many other businesses in a variety of ways. In some cases, businesses were temporarily closed, limited in their business activities or directed to offer modified services. This may ultimately impact consumers’ access and ability to afford nursery and greenhouse products, if the consumers’ household employment status has been negatively impacted. Other firms experienced labor issues due to outbreaks or employee illness. In some cases, this likely impacted the available supplies of some products. Many businesses experienced impacts on sales of their products and/or services. For instance, green industry projections anticipate that industry revenue growth will slow in 2020, due to decreased per capita income and consumer spending, with the largest threat coming from supply chain disruptions and shortages, partially attributed to COVID-19 (IBISWorld, 2020). While nursery and greenhouse growers were considered essential, several economic forces led to unintended consequences due to the COVID-19 pandemic and have likely influenced the state’s nursery and greenhouse industry. First, the pandemic has had negative impacts on employment and consumers’ employment (Jensen, et al., 2020) and consequently incomes, which could negatively impact sales of nursery and greenhouse products (IBISWorld, 2020). For example, Tennessee’s unemployment increased from 3.3 percent in January 2020, to 15.5 percent in April 2020, and 11.0 percent in May 2020 (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2020). Anecdotal evidence suggests, however, that national, statewide and local better-at-home recommendations and stay-at-home directives have encouraged some consumers to add to their landscapes, grow their own food at home or participate in other gardening activities (Murphy, 2020; Willjasper and Polansek, 2020), as many consumers count gardening as a healthy hobby (Conway, 2016; Soga, Gaston, and Yamaura, 2017). Third, nursery stock sales can be linked in part to the housing markets. Compared with February, the month just prior to the pandemic, housing starts declined in March-June, with the greatest decline observed this year in March and April (US Census Bureau, 2020a). In the U.S., new single unit housing starts declined from 994,000 in February to 666,000 in April. For the southern U.S., single unit housing starts declined from 732,000 in February to 612,000 in April. Fourth, in some cases, growers may have experienced temporary labor disruptions due to infection or health concerns among workers. An important component of keeping the nursery greenhouse industry supply chain disruptions to a minimum and maintaining the well-being of the industry is being able to keep workers on a payroll through the pandemic (Bartik et al., 2020).

Suggested Citation

  • Rihn, Alicia & Jensen, Kimberly L., "undated". "Paycheck Protection Program Participation in Tennessee's Green Industry: April 3-June 30, 2020," Extension Reports 305343, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:305343
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.305343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/305343/files/W937.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.305343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander W. Bartik & Zoë Cullen & Edward L. Glaeser & Michael Luca & Christopher T. Stanton & Adi Sunderam, 2020. "When Should Public Programs be Privately Administered? Theory and Evidence from the Paycheck Protection Program," NBER Working Papers 27623, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rihn, Alicia L. & Upendram, Sreedhar & Jensen, Kimberly L., "undated". "Paycheck Protection Program Loans in Tennessee's Landscape Services Industry April 3-August 8, 2020," Extension Reports 308843, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kren, Janez & Lawless, Martina & O'Toole, Conor, 2021. "Cost of doing business during COVID-19: SME investment in public health compliance," Papers WP701, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    2. Robert Fairlie & Frank M. Fossen, 2022. "The early impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on business sales," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1853-1864, April.
    3. Huixin Bi & W. Blake Marsh, 2020. "Flight to Liquidity or Safety? Recent Evidence from the Municipal Bond Market," Research Working Paper RWP 20-19, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    4. Benetton, Matteo & Fantino, Davide, 2021. "Targeted monetary policy and bank lending behavior," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 404-429.
    5. Sergey Chernenko & David S. Scharfstein, 2022. "Racial Disparities in the Paycheck Protection Program," NBER Working Papers 29748, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Berger, Allen N. & Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, 2021. "Banking research in the time of COVID-19," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    7. Lei Li & Philip Strahan, 2020. "Who Supplies PPP Loans (And Does it Matter)? Banks, Relationships and the COVID Crisis," NBER Working Papers 28286, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Kozeniauskas, Nicholas & Moreira, Pedro & Santos, Cezar, 2022. "On the cleansing effect of recessions and government policy: Evidence from Covid-19," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    9. Robert W. Fairlie & Frank M. Fossen, 2021. "Sales Losses in the First Quarter of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from California Administrative Data," NBER Working Papers 28414, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Glenn Hubbard & Michael R. Strain, 2020. "Has the Paycheck Protection Program Succeeded?," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 51(3 (Fall)), pages 335-390.
    11. Robert W. Fairlie & Frank Fossen, 2021. "Did the $660 Billion Paycheck Protection Program and $220 Billion Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program Get Disbursed to Minority Communities in the Early Stages of COVID-19?," NBER Working Papers 28321, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Sriya Anbil & Mark A. Carlson & Mary-Frances Styczynski, 2021. "The Effect of the PPPLF on PPP Lending by Commercial Banks," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2021-030, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    13. Diana Bonfim & Cláudia Custódio, 2021. "The sensitivity of SME’s investment and employment to the cost of debt financing," Working Papers w202115, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    14. W. Blake Marsh & Padma Sharma, 2020. "PPP Raised Community Bank Revenue but Lowered Profitability," Economic Bulletin, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 1-5, December.
    15. Tetyana Balyuk & Nagpurnanand R. Prabhala & Manju Puri, 2020. "Indirect Costs of Government Aid and Intermediary Supply Effects: Lessons From the Paycheck Protection Program," NBER Working Papers 28114, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Granja, João & Makridis, Christos & Yannelis, Constantine & Zwick, Eric, 2022. "Did the paycheck protection program hit the target?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(3), pages 725-761.
    17. Xiaobing Shuai & Christine Chmura & James Stinchcomb, 2021. "COVID-19, labor demand, and government responses: evidence from job posting data," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 56(1), pages 29-42, January.
    18. Michael D. Noel, 2022. "Competitive survival in a devastated industry: Evidence from hotels during COVID‐19," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 3-24, February.
    19. Allen N. Berger & Christa H. S. Bouwman & Lars Norden & Raluca A. Roman & Gregory F. Udell & Teng Wang, 2024. "Piercing through Opacity: Relationships and Credit Card Lending to Consumers and Small Businesses during Normal Times and the COVID-19 Crisis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 132(2), pages 484-551.
    20. Sabrina T. Howell & Theresa Kuchler & David Snitkof & Johannes Stroebel & Jun Wong, 2024. "Lender Automation and Racial Disparities in Credit Access," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(2), pages 1457-1512, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:305343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dautkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.