IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/unaaed/269545.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Economic Analysis of Grain Legumes Utilization and Gross Margins in Nandi County, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Onyango, Mercy Anyango
  • Otieno, David Jakinda
  • Nyikal, Rose Adhiambo
  • Ojiem, John

Abstract

Grain legumes have great potential for improving smallholder farmers’ productivity in SubSaharan Africa (SSA). However, this has not been fully exploited due to critical problems such as high insect pests and disease infestation. As part of addressing these challenges, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) in collaboration with Cornell University and supported by the Collaborative Crop Research Program (CCRP) introduced crop and soil enhancing strategies in Western Kenya. One of the strategies included use of multipurpose grain legumes species in Nandi County. Through this initiative, various legume species including common bean, cowpea, groundnuts, dolichos lablab and soybean are being promoted at the farm level. However, the extent of their utilization and the actual benefit is not known precisely as it is not comprehensively documented. Furthermore, no empirical study has delved in the assessment of the economic benefits that farmers are likely to obtain if they adopt the legume species. In order to address the aforementioned knowledge gaps, the present study sought to analyze utilization and evaluate gross margins of grain legumes. Data was collected from a random sample of 163 farmers from three study sites in Nandi County (Koibem, Kapkerer and Kiptaruswo sites). Descriptive statistics on frequencies and percentages on utilization and legume attributes were presented in graphs and tables. Further, gross margins were computed from farm-level data while multiple regression model was applied to determine factors influencing the gross margins obtained. Results showed that farmers’ priorities for use of legume included; food dishes, income generation, forage and soil fertility improvement. This indicates that farmers value legumes for home consumption purposes and also for income. Descriptive statistics revealed that about 56 percent of the households had positive gross margins while the rest incured losses in the production of grain. Further, beans, groundnuts, cowpeas and soybean had positive gross margins while dolichos lablab gross margin was negative. This indicates that vi generally legumes farming is feasible. Groundnuts and beans accounted for about 49 percent and 36 percent, respectively of the total legume gross margins. Farm labour cost was the largest component of cost, accounting for about 68 percent of the total variable production cost of legumes. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that there was no statistical difference at 95 percent in the mean gross margins for the legumes studied. Further, the multiple regressions indicated that area under grain legumes, age of the farmer, access to extension services and access to credit had significant influence on gross margin. As such, different interventions are needed so as to promote the production and diversify utilization patterns of the legumes. For instance, interventions geared towards increasing diversification of utilization of legumes through processing and value addition by for instance processor village groups for soybean or any other legume through provision of processing equipment and training on the usage by the project is necessary. Also, there is need to minimize labour cost for instance through provision of seeds with less labour requirements to farmers. Further, there is the need for appraisals of extension services in order to improve the delivery to farmers. Similarly, policies and interventions which can promote credit access would enhance gains from legumes.

Suggested Citation

  • Onyango, Mercy Anyango & Otieno, David Jakinda & Nyikal, Rose Adhiambo & Ojiem, John, 2017. "An Economic Analysis of Grain Legumes Utilization and Gross Margins in Nandi County, Kenya," Dissertations and Theses 269545, University of Nairobi, Department of Agricultural Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:unaaed:269545
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.269545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/269545/files/Mercy%20Onyango_%20Thesis.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/269545/files/Mercy%20Onyango_%20Thesis.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.269545?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas W. Ebert, 2014. "Potential of Underutilized Traditional Vegetables and Legume Crops to Contribute to Food and Nutritional Security, Income and More Sustainable Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Kiptot, Evelyne & Hebinck, Paul & Franzel, Steven & Richards, Paul, 2007. "Adopters, testers or pseudo-adopters? Dynamics of the use of improved tree fallows by farmers in western Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 509-519, May.
    3. Timothy G. Conley & Christopher R. Udry, 2010. "Learning about a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 35-69, March.
    4. Haggblade, Steven & Hazell, Peter B. R. (ed.), 2010. "Successes in African agriculture: Lessons for the future," IFPRI books, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), number 978-0-8018-9503-6.
    5. Abdulai, Awudu & Binder, Claudia R., 2006. "Slash-and-burn cultivation practice and agricultural input demand and output supply," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 201-220, April.
    6. Tshering, Chhime, 2002. "Profitability Analysis Of Bean Production In Honduras," Agricultural Economic Report Series 10936, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    7. Pierre Matungul & Michael Lyne & Gerald Ortmann, 2001. "Transaction costs and crop marketing in the communal areas of Impendle and Swayimana, KwaZulu-Natal," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 347-363.
    8. Jeff Bennett & Ekin Birol (ed.), 2010. "Choice Experiments in Developing Countries," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13208.
    9. Fischer, Elisabeth & Qaim, Matin, 2012. "Linking Smallholders to Markets: Determinants and Impacts of Farmer Collective Action in Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 1255-1268.
    10. Kamara, Abdul B., 2004. "The impact of market access on input use and agricultural productivity: Evidence from Machakos District, Kenya," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 43(2), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Randela, Rendani & Liebenberg, Frikkie & Kirsten, Johann F. & Townsend, Rob F., 2000. "Demand for livestock tick control service in the Venda region, Northern Province," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 39(4), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Alain de Janvry & Elisabeth Sadoulet, 2010. "Agriculture for Development in Africa: Business-as-Usual or New Departures?-super- †," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 19(suppl_2), pages 7-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raju Ghimire & Wen-Chi Huang, 2015. "Household wealth and adoption of improved maize varieties in Nepal: a double-hurdle approach," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 7(6), pages 1321-1335, December.
    2. Vishnu, Kedar & Rai, Ruchika, 2022. "Measuring The Impact of Transaction Costs on Profitability of Farmers: Empirical Evidence from India," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322593, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Christina Handschuch & Meike Wollni, 2016. "Improved production systems for traditional food crops: the case of finger millet in western Kenya," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(4), pages 783-797, August.
    4. Aggarwal, Shilpa & Francis, Eilin & Robinson, Jonathan, 2018. "Grain today, gain tomorrow: Evidence from a storage experiment with savings clubs in Kenya," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-15.
    5. David Alfaro‐Serrano & Tanay Balantrapu & Ritam Chaurey & Ana Goicoechea & Eric Verhoogen, 2021. "Interventions to promote technology adoption in firms: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), December.
    6. Onyango, Mercy & Otieno, David Jakinda & Nyikal, Rose Adhiambo & Ojiem, John, 2016. "An economic analysis of grain legumes profitability in Nandi County, Kenya," 2016 Fifth International Conference, September 23-26, 2016, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 246921, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    7. Allison Benson & Jean-Paul Faguet & Maria del pilar López Uribe, 2020. "Increasing Access to Agricultural Credit: The Heterogeneous Effects of Collective Action," Documentos CEDE 18347, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    8. Fang Wu & Xibao Guo & Xia Guo, 2023. "Cooperative membership and new technology adoption of family farms: Evidence from China," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 719-739, September.
    9. Cazzuffi, Chiara & McKay, Andy & Perge, Emilie, 2020. "The impact of agricultural commercialisation on household welfare in rural Vietnam," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Dlamini, Lucinda Nosizo, 2019. "Determinants of commercial orientation and the level of market participation by women maize farmers in Eswatini," Research Theses 334763, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    11. Uttam Khanal & Clevo Wilson & Viet-Ngu Hoang & Boon Lee, 2019. "Impact of community-based organizations on climate change adaptation in agriculture: empirical evidence from Nepal," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 621-635, April.
    12. Amare, Dagninet & Darr, Dietrich, 2020. "Agroforestry adoption as a systems concept: A review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    13. Baiyegunhi, L.J.S. & Majokweni, Z.P. & Ferrer, S.R.D., 2019. "Impact of outsourced agricultural extension program on smallholder farmers’ net farm income in Msinga, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-7.
    14. Jackering, L. & Fongar, A. & Godecke, T. & Mbugua, M. & Njuguna, M. & Ogutu, S. & Wollni, M., 2018. "Communication Networks and the Adoption of Technologies: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277540, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. S Anukriti & Catalina Herrera‐Almanza & Praveen K. Pathak & Mahesh Karra, 2020. "Curse of the Mummy‐ji: The Influence of Mothers‐in‐Law on Women in India†," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(5), pages 1328-1351, October.
    16. Azariadis, Costas & Stachurski, John, 2005. "Poverty Traps," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, Elsevier.
    17. Bonatti, Alessandro & Hörner, Johannes, 2017. "Learning to disagree in a game of experimentation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 234-269.
    18. Alex Hollingsworth & Krzysztof Karbownik & Melissa A. Thomasson & Anthony Wray, 2022. "The Gift of a Lifetime: The Hospital, Modern Medicine, and Mortality," NBER Working Papers 30663, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Mekonnen, Daniel Ayalew & Gerber, Nicolas & Matz, Julia Anna, 2018. "Gendered Social Networks, Agricultural Innovations, and Farm Productivity in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 321-335.
    20. Peter Bergman, 2020. "Nudging Technology Use: Descriptive and Experimental Evidence from School Information Systems," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 15(4), pages 623-647, Fall.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:unaaed:269545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://agrieconomics.uonbi.ac.ke/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.