IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Economic Analysis of Grain Legumes Utilization and Gross Margins in Nandi County, Kenya


  • Onyango, Mercy Anyango
  • Otieno, David Jakinda
  • Nyikal, Rose Adhiambo
  • Ojiem, John


Grain legumes have great potential for improving smallholder farmers’ productivity in SubSaharan Africa (SSA). However, this has not been fully exploited due to critical problems such as high insect pests and disease infestation. As part of addressing these challenges, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) in collaboration with Cornell University and supported by the Collaborative Crop Research Program (CCRP) introduced crop and soil enhancing strategies in Western Kenya. One of the strategies included use of multipurpose grain legumes species in Nandi County. Through this initiative, various legume species including common bean, cowpea, groundnuts, dolichos lablab and soybean are being promoted at the farm level. However, the extent of their utilization and the actual benefit is not known precisely as it is not comprehensively documented. Furthermore, no empirical study has delved in the assessment of the economic benefits that farmers are likely to obtain if they adopt the legume species. In order to address the aforementioned knowledge gaps, the present study sought to analyze utilization and evaluate gross margins of grain legumes. Data was collected from a random sample of 163 farmers from three study sites in Nandi County (Koibem, Kapkerer and Kiptaruswo sites). Descriptive statistics on frequencies and percentages on utilization and legume attributes were presented in graphs and tables. Further, gross margins were computed from farm-level data while multiple regression model was applied to determine factors influencing the gross margins obtained. Results showed that farmers’ priorities for use of legume included; food dishes, income generation, forage and soil fertility improvement. This indicates that farmers value legumes for home consumption purposes and also for income. Descriptive statistics revealed that about 56 percent of the households had positive gross margins while the rest incured losses in the production of grain. Further, beans, groundnuts, cowpeas and soybean had positive gross margins while dolichos lablab gross margin was negative. This indicates that vi generally legumes farming is feasible. Groundnuts and beans accounted for about 49 percent and 36 percent, respectively of the total legume gross margins. Farm labour cost was the largest component of cost, accounting for about 68 percent of the total variable production cost of legumes. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that there was no statistical difference at 95 percent in the mean gross margins for the legumes studied. Further, the multiple regressions indicated that area under grain legumes, age of the farmer, access to extension services and access to credit had significant influence on gross margin. As such, different interventions are needed so as to promote the production and diversify utilization patterns of the legumes. For instance, interventions geared towards increasing diversification of utilization of legumes through processing and value addition by for instance processor village groups for soybean or any other legume through provision of processing equipment and training on the usage by the project is necessary. Also, there is need to minimize labour cost for instance through provision of seeds with less labour requirements to farmers. Further, there is the need for appraisals of extension services in order to improve the delivery to farmers. Similarly, policies and interventions which can promote credit access would enhance gains from legumes.

Suggested Citation

  • Onyango, Mercy Anyango & Otieno, David Jakinda & Nyikal, Rose Adhiambo & Ojiem, John, 2017. "An Economic Analysis of Grain Legumes Utilization and Gross Margins in Nandi County, Kenya," Dissertations and Theses 269545, University of Nairobi, Department of Agricultural Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:unaaed:269545
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.269545

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Kiptot, Evelyne & Hebinck, Paul & Franzel, Steven & Richards, Paul, 2007. "Adopters, testers or pseudo-adopters? Dynamics of the use of improved tree fallows by farmers in western Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 509-519, May.
    2. Tshering, Chhime, 2002. "Profitability Analysis Of Bean Production In Honduras," Agricultural Economic Report Series 10936, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    3. Randela, Rendani & Liebenberg, Frikkie & Kirsten, Johann F. & Townsend, Rob F., 2000. "Demand for livestock tick control service in the Venda region, Northern Province," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 39(4), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Timothy G. Conley & Christopher R. Udry, 2010. "Learning about a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 35-69, March.
    5. Pierre Matungul & Michael Lyne & Gerald Ortmann, 2001. "Transaction costs and crop marketing in the communal areas of Impendle and Swayimana, KwaZulu-Natal," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 347-363.
    6. Alain de Janvry & Elisabeth Sadoulet, 2010. "Agriculture for Development in Africa: Business-as-Usual or New Departures?-super- †," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), vol. 19(suppl_2), pages 7-39.
    7. Jeff Bennett & Ekin Birol (ed.), 2010. "Choice Experiments in Developing Countries," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13208.
    8. Haggblade, Steven & Hazell, Peter B. R. (ed.), 2010. "Successes in African agriculture: Lessons for the future," IFPRI books, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), number 978-0-8018-9503-6.
    9. Abdulai, Awudu & Binder, Claudia R., 2006. "Slash-and-burn cultivation practice and agricultural input demand and output supply," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(02), pages 201-220, April.
    10. Fischer, Elisabeth & Qaim, Matin, 2012. "Linking Smallholders to Markets: Determinants and Impacts of Farmer Collective Action in Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 1255-1268.
    11. Kamara, Abdul B., 2004. "The impact of market access on input use and agricultural productivity: Evidence from Machakos District, Kenya," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 43(2), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item




    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:unaaed:269545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.