IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/333399.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of the Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Zimbabwean Economy: A case of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA)

Author

Listed:
  • Nesongano, Talent

Abstract

This paper examined the impact of trade liberalization on the Zimbabwean economy under the AfCFTA. A standard single country, static CGE (PEP-1-1) model with 2013 as the base period is presented and used to generate simulation results of removing tariffs. Given the generalization of the trade data, the results are necessarily representative of what could be the situation after liberalizing trade under the AfCFTA. The results show that trade liberalization causes import prices to decrease, with paper & paper products (-75.8%), rubber & plastic products (-14.5%), glass and glass products (-12.7%), machinery (-10.7%) and other grains (-10.6%) having notable decreases. The results also show that trade liberalization favours export-oriented sectors that use imported commodities intensively in their production. Consumers will experience low prices in the market due to the removal of tariffs on imported commodities. From the results, the products that have notable consumer price decreases are paper & paper products (-44.1%), machinery (-10.5%), and other livestock (-9.4%). The fall in prices affects domestic production and will cause the wage rates of the unskilled labour force to decrease by 1.7%, although the skilled labour force’s wage rates will increase by 0.3%. This could mean that sectors laying off workers are unskilled labour intensive, leading to a drop in the corresponding wages, while sectors that are hiring are skilled labour intensive, hence the increase in the wage rate. For example, the results show that demand for labour in smallholder farms will decrease, which could be causing the demand for unskilled labour to decrease. The revenue collected by the government from import duties and other taxes will fall by 10.6%. Thus, export-oriented sectors should be promoted to compensate for the revenue losses through an increase in production which will cause a rise in labour demand and ultimately wage rate increases as sectors compete for the available workforce.

Suggested Citation

  • Nesongano, Talent, 2022. "Analysis of the Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Zimbabwean Economy: A case of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA)," Conference papers 333399, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333399/files/11065.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davies, Rob & Rattso, Jorn & Torvik, Ragnar, 1998. "Short-Run Consequences of Trade Liberalization: A Computable General Equilibrium Model of Zimbabwe," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 305-333, June.
    2. Rattso, Jorn & Torvik, Ragnar, 1998. "Zimbabwean Trade Liberalisation: Ex Post Evaluation," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 22(3), pages 325-346, May.
    3. Margaret Chitiga & Ramos Mabugu & Tonia Kandiero, 2007. "The impact of tariff removal on poverty in Zimbabwe: A computable general equilibrium microsimulation," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 1105-1125.
    4. Bautista, Romeo M. & Lofgren, Hans & Thomas, Marcelle, 1998. "Does trade liberalization enhance income growth and equity in Zimbabwe?: the role of complimentary policies," TMD discussion papers 32, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chitiga, Margaret & Kandiero, Tonia & Mabugu, Ramos, 2005. "A Computable General Equilibrium Micro-Simulation Analysis of the Impact of Trade Policies on Poverty in Zimbabwe," Conference papers 331388, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. Jean, Sebastien & Laborde, David & Martin, William J., 2005. "Sensitive Products: Selection and Implications for Agricultural Trade Negotiations," Working Papers 18860, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    3. Lucy Rees & Rod Tyers, 2004. "On the Robustness of Short Run Gains from Trade Reform," CEPR Discussion Papers 474, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    4. Buffie, Edward F. & Atolia, Manoj, 2012. "Trade, growth, and poverty in Zambia: Insights from a dynamic GE model," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 211-229.
    5. Syed Shoyeb Hossain & Huang Delin, 2022. "Measuring economic impact in Korea, Japan, India, China, and ASEAN considering agricultural sectors: a dynamic CGE approach based on GAMS," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(2), pages 571-613, May.
    6. Eddy Lee, 2005. "Trade Liberalization and Employment," Working Papers 5, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    7. Margaret Chitiga & Ramos Mabugu & Tonia Kandiero, 2007. "The impact of tariff removal on poverty in Zimbabwe: A computable general equilibrium microsimulation," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 1105-1125.
    8. R Mabugu, 2001. "Macroeconomic Effects Of A Devaluation In Zimbabwe A Cge Analysis," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 69(4), pages 708-733, December.
    9. Ballard, Charles L. & Goddeeris, John H., 2004. "First, Do No Harm: Welfare Gains and Welfare Losses from Environmental Taxation," Conference papers 331257, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    10. Eduardo Haddad & Fernando Perobelli, 2001. "Regional Absorption of Terms of Trade Shocks," ERSA conference papers ersa01p185, European Regional Science Association.
    11. Kakarlapudi, Kiran Kumar, 2010. "The Impact of Trade Liberalisation on Employment: Evidence from India’s Manufacturing Sector," MPRA Paper 35872, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Jan 2012.
    12. Vashisht, Pankaj, 2016. "Creating manufacturing jobs in India: Has openness to trade really helped?," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 53-64.
    13. Mansoorian, Arman & Mohsin, Mohammed, 2010. "On the employment, investment, and current account effects of trade liberalizations with durability in consumption," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 228-240, December.
    14. Bittencourt, Maurício Vaz Lobo & Kraybill, David S. & Larson, Donald W., 2006. "Consequences Of Trade Liberalization On Poverty And Income Distribution In Brazil," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21128, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Pankaj Vashisht, 2015. "Creating Manufacturing Jobs in India: Has Openness to Trade Really Helped?," Working Papers id:7126, eSocialSciences.
    16. Botta, Alberto, 2010. "The Palestinian economy and its trade pattern: Stylised facts and alternative modelling strategies," MPRA Paper 29719, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. M Nsanzabaganwa & PA Black, 2002. "Spokes In The Wheels Of Trade Reform: An African Perspective," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 70(5), pages 900-911, June.
    18. Saeed Solaymani & Mehdi Shokrinia, 2016. "Economic and environmental effects of trade liberalization in Malaysia," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 18(1), pages 101-120, October.
    19. Zouhair Mrabet, 2012. "The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Labor Market of Developing Countries: What can Literature tell us?," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 4(6), pages 307-318.
    20. Haixiao Huang, Walter C. Labys, 2002. "Environment and trade: a review of issues and methods," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2), pages 100-160.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade; International Relations/Trade;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.