IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/tmddps/32.html

Does trade liberalization enhance income growth and equity in Zimbabwe?: the role of complimentary policies

Author

Listed:
  • Bautista, Romeo M.
  • Lofgren, Hans
  • Thomas, Marcelle

Abstract

Using an agriculture-focused CGE model for Zimbabwe with 1991 as base period, this paper examines quantitatively the income and equity effects of trade liberalization in isolation and in conjunction with potentially complementary changes in fiscal and land policies. Trade policy reform alone (dismantling of import and foreign exchange controls, and reduction of import taxes to a low uniform rate) is shown to increase aggregate disposable household income significantly. However, the least income gain accrues to smallholder farm households, which account for about four-fifths of the poor in Zimbabwe, so the equity impact is unfavorable. Concurrent implementation with specific changes in government expenditure and tax policies and two alternative stylized land redistribution schemes yields differing outcomes in terms of aggregate household income growth and its distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Bautista, Romeo M. & Lofgren, Hans & Thomas, Marcelle, 1998. "Does trade liberalization enhance income growth and equity in Zimbabwe?: the role of complimentary policies," TMD discussion papers 32, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    • Handle: RePEc:fpr:tmddps:32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/161214
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. International Monetary Fund, 1997. "Zimbabwe: Recent Economic Developments," IMF Staff Country Reports 1997/059, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Jaime de Melo & Sherman Robinson, 2015. "Trade Policy And Resource Allocation In The Presence Of Product Differentiation," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Modeling Developing Countries' Policies in General Equilibrium, chapter 16, pages 357-365, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Christopher Delgado & Peter Hazell & Jane Hopkins & Valerie Kelly, 1994. "Promoting Intersectoral Growth Linkages in Rural Africa Through Agricultural Technology and Policy Reform," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(5), pages 1166-1171.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean, Sebastien & Laborde, David & Martin, William J., 2005. "Sensitive Products: Selection and Implications for Agricultural Trade Negotiations," Working Papers 18860, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    2. Nesongano, Talent, 2022. "Analysis of the Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Zimbabwean Economy: A case of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA)," Conference papers 333399, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Margaret Chitiga & Tonia Kandiero & Ramos Mabugu, 2005. "Computable General Equilibrium Micro-Simulation Analysis of the Impact of Trade Policies on Poverty in Zimbabwe," Working Papers MPIA 2005-01, PEP-MPIA.
    4. Margaret Chitiga & Ramos Mabugu & Tonia Kandiero, 2007. "The impact of tariff removal on poverty in Zimbabwe: A computable general equilibrium microsimulation," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 1105-1125.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haddad, Lawrence J. & Zeller, Manfred, 1996. "How can safety nets do more with less?: general issues with some evidence from Southern Africa," FCND discussion papers 16, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Romeo M. Bautista & Sherman Robinson & Finn Tarp & Peter Wobst, 2001. "Policy Bias and Agriculture: Partial and General Equilibrium Measures," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 89-104, February.
    3. Henning Tarp Jensen & Sherman Robinson & Finn Tarp, 2010. "Measuring Agricultural Policy Bias: General Equilibrium Analysis of Fifteen Developing Countries," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(4), pages 1136-1148.
    4. Das, Gouranga G., 2002. "Cross-Country Analysis of Empirical Evidences of Intra-industry Trade in Manufactures for Dynamic Asian and Other Developing Economies: Implications for Economic Growth and Development," MPRA Paper 37916, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2002.
    5. Sugiyarto, Guntur & Sinclair, M. Thea & Blake, Adam, 2001. "The Economic Effects and Distributional Implications of Globalisation and Foreign Tourism Boom in the Indonesian Economy: A CGE Assessment," Conference papers 330925, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    6. Go, Delfin & McDonald, Scott & Thierfelder, Karen & Walmsley, Terrie, 2014. "R-2-3: A Simple Global CGE Analysis Focusing on Macroeconomic Links," Conference papers 332452, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Douillet, Mathilde, 2012. "Trade policy reforms in the new agricultural context: Is regional integration a priority for Sub-Saharan African countries agricultural-led industrialization? Insights from a global computable general equilibrium analysis," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126546, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Molden, David, 2008. "Water security for food security: findings of the Comprehensive Assessment for Sub-Saharan Africa. [This report draws directly from the book Water for food, water for life: a Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture]," IWMI Conference Proceedings 233268, International Water Management Institute.
    9. Kuyvenhoven, Arie & Ruben, Ruerd & Kruseman, Gideon, 1998. "Technology, market policies and institutional reform for sustainable land use in southern Mali," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 19(1-2), pages 53-62, September.
    10. Pagoulatos, Emilio & Lopez, Elena, 1983. "A Model of Agricultural Trade for Differentiated Products," Staff Paper Series 239855, University of Florida, Food and Resource Economics Department.
    11. Abdulai, Awudu & Delgado, Christopher L., 1997. "Determinants of Time Spent in Non-Farm Employment by Farmers in Northern Ghana," 1997 Conference, August 10-16, 1997, Sacramento, California 197047, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Jensen, Henning Tarp & Robinson, Sherman & Tarp, Finn, 2002. "General equilibrium measures of agricultural policy bias in fifteen developing countries," TMD discussion papers 105, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Alston, Julian M. & Carter, Colin A. & Green, Richard & Pick, Daniel, 1988. "Armington Restrictions And Agricultural Import Demand Models," Working Papers 225822, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    14. Julian M. Alston & Colin A. Carter & Richard Green & Daniel Pick, 1990. "Whither Armington Trade Models?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(2), pages 455-467.
    15. Bautista, Romeo M. & Thomas, Marcelle, 1998. "Agricultural Growth Linkages In Zimbabwe: Income And Equity Effects," TMD Discussion Papers 97549, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    16. Thomas, Marcelle & Bautista, Romeo M., 1999. "A 1991 social accounting matrix (SAM) for Zimbabwe," TMD Discussion Papers 97556, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. Douillet, Mathilde, 2011. "Which trade integration scheme can best help Sub-Saharan Africa develop and export more processed agricultural goods?:," IFPRI discussion papers 1119, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    18. Carter, Michael R. & Barham, Bradford L., 1996. "Level playing fields and laissez faire: Postliberal development strategy in inegalitarian agrarian economies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 1133-1149, July.
    19. Castillo, G. E. & Namara, Regassa & Ravnborg, H. M. & Hanjra, M. A. & Smith, L. & Hussein, M. H. & Bene, Christopher & Cook, S. & Hirsch, D. & Polak, P. & Valee, Domitille & van Koppen, Barbara, 2007. "Reversing the flow: agricultural water management pathways for poverty reduction," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    20. Hilson, Gavin & Laing, Tim & Hilson, Abigail & Arnall, Alex & Mondlane, Salvador, 2025. "How Does Small-Scale Mining Stabilize Rural Livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa? The Case of Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:tmddps:32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.