IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/333143.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The General Equilibrium Impacts of Carbon Tax Policy in China: A Multi-model Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Cao, Jing
  • Dai, Hancheng
  • Li, Shantong
  • Guo, Chaoyi
  • He, Jianwu
  • Ho, Mun
  • Cai, Wenjia
  • Li, Jifeng
  • Liu, Yu
  • Wang, Can
  • Wu, Libo
  • Zhang, Xiliang

Abstract

The purpose of this modeling exercise is to conduct a multi-model comparison of carbon tax policy in China to examine the potential impacts in both near-term 2020, medium-term 2030 and distant future 2050. Though Top-down CGE models have been applied frequently on climate or other environmental/energy policies to assess emission reduction, energy and economic wide general equilibrium outcomes in China, different models often vary greatly across models. In this paper, we examine and compare a range of Chinese CGE models with different characteristics, to look at a plausible range of carbon tax scenarios, examine and compare the model differences by focusing on a common set of carbon tax policies (low, medium and high carbon tax scenarios), with same socio-economic drivers such as population and labor input projections, GDP projections, foreign energy price shocks and etc. We found the overall impacts of carbon tax to achieve China’s 2030 NDC target is similarly on macro-level indicators across the selected China CGE models: low and medium tax pricing regime can help China reach its NDC target with limited negative impacts economic-widely. However, models differ substantially in terms of impacts on detail structure of GDP, price impacts, quantity impacts at sectoral level, as well as energy and carbon intensity reductions.

Suggested Citation

  • Cao, Jing & Dai, Hancheng & Li, Shantong & Guo, Chaoyi & He, Jianwu & Ho, Mun & Cai, Wenjia & Li, Jifeng & Liu, Yu & Wang, Can & Wu, Libo & Zhang, Xiliang, 2020. "The General Equilibrium Impacts of Carbon Tax Policy in China: A Multi-model Assessment," Conference papers 333143, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333143/files/9787.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haoqi, Qian & Libo, Wu & Weiqi, Tang, 2017. "“Lock-in” effect of emission standard and its impact on the choice of market based instruments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 41-50.
    2. Haakon Vennemo & Jianwu He & Shantong Li, 2014. "Macroeconomic Impacts of Carbon Capture and Storage in China," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 59(3), pages 455-477, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Jing & Dai, Hancheng & Li, Shantong & Guo, Chaoyi & Ho, Mun & Cai, Wenjia & He, Jianwu & Huang, Hai & Li, Jifeng & Liu, Yu & Qian, Haoqi & Wang, Can & Wu, Libo & Zhang, Xiliang, 2021. "The general equilibrium impacts of carbon tax policy in China: A multi-model comparison," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Du, Huibin & Li, Qun & Liu, Xi & Peng, Binbin & Southworth, Frank, 2021. "Costs and potentials of reducing CO2 emissions in China's transport sector: Findings from an energy system analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. Shenghao Feng & Xiujian Peng & Philip Adams, 2021. "Energy and Economic Implications of Carbon Neutrality in China -- A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-318, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    4. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2019. "How does tax system on energy industries affect energy demand, CO2 emissions, and economy in China?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    5. Fang, Chenhao & Ma, Tieju, 2020. "Stylized agent-based modeling on linking emission trading systems and its implications for China's practice," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Wei, Wendong & Cai, Wenqiu & Guo, Yi & Bai, Caiquan & Yang, Luzhen, 2020. "Decoupling relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in China's provinces from the perspective of resource security," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2019. "Impacts of carbon price level in carbon emission trading market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 157-170.
    8. Svetlov, Nikolai (Светов, Николай) & Shishkina, Ekaterina (Шишкина, Екатерина), 2016. "Economic and Mathematical Modeling of EAEC Agri-food Policy [Экономико-Математическое Моделирование Агро- Продовольственной Политики Еаэс]," Working Papers 767, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    9. Karen Turner & Antonios Katris & Abdoul Karim Zanhouo & Christian Calvillo & Julia Race, 2023. "The potential importance of exploiting export markets for CO2 transport and storage services in realising the economic value of Scottish CCS," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(3), pages 264-281, May.
    10. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2019. "What will China's carbon emission trading market affect with only electricity sector involvement? A CGE based study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 301-311.
    11. Feng, Shenghao & Zhang, Keyu, 2018. "Fuel-factor nesting structures in CGE models of China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 274-284.
    12. Wu, Libo & Zhou, Ying & Qian, Haoqi, 2022. "Global actions under the Paris agreement: Tracing the carbon leakage flow and pursuing countermeasures," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    13. Govinda R. Timilsina & Jing Cao & Mun Ho, 2018. "Carbon Tax For Achieving China’S Ndc: Simulations Of Some Design Features Using A Cge Model," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 1-17, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.