IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332969.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

US Withdrawal From International Trade: Analyzing the Impact on the Global Trading System With a Global CGE Model and a Gravity Model

Author

Listed:
  • Robinson, Sherman
  • Thierfelder, Karen

Abstract

Current US trade policy goals may result in a withdrawal of the US from the global trading system. The impact may be local, as NAFTA is renegotiated, or more widespread, as the US becomes generally more protectionist. We analyze the possible effects on the US economy and on the global trading system using two modelling approaches: (1) a global computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of the world economy to consider trade war scenarios, and (2) a global gravity model to consider scenarios of trade diversion around the US. Analysis of trade share changes using a CGE model is constrained by functional form. Virtually all trade-focused CGE models adopt the “Armington” convention and use a constant elasticity of substitution (CES) function to represent preferences over imports and the domestic variety. All goods are “semi-tradable” and trade shares can only change due to price shocks (e.g., tariff changes). The policy shocks that the US is planning to implement involve a variety of non-tariff approaches and are likely to result in other countries diverting their trade regardless of simple price incentives (e.g., move value chains away from the US). We explore the effects of such non-price changes in trade shares using a new form of a gravity model, focusing directly on quantity trade shares. We use an “entropy gravity model” starting with the initial matrix of global trade shares by country We then specify that the US will reduce its total exports (or sectoral exports) by an exogenous amount. We then specify constraints on the trading system: (1) Country trade balances remain constant, and (2) the volume of global trade remains constant. The result is to focus only on trade diversion. Initial scenario analysis indicates that, globally, countries can divert trade around the US relatively easily (modest changes in trade shares). Countries initially very dependent on the US (e.g., Canada, Mexico) are hurt, but almost all other countries expand their trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2018. "US Withdrawal From International Trade: Analyzing the Impact on the Global Trading System With a Global CGE Model and a Gravity Model," Conference papers 332969, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332969/files/8947.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott McDonald & Sherman Robinson & Karen Thierfelder, 2007. "Globe: A SAM Based Global CGE Model using GTAP Data," Departmental Working Papers 14, United States Naval Academy Department of Economics.
    2. Walmsley, Terrie & Angel Aguiar & Badri Narayanan, 2012. "Introduction to the Global Trade Analysis Project and the GTAP Data Base," GTAP Working Papers 3965, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    3. Walmsley, Terrie & Angel Aguiar & Badri Narayanan, 2012. "Introduction to the Global Trade Analysis Project and the GTAP Data Base," GTAP Working Papers 3965, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2018. "NAFTA collapse, trade war and North American disengagement," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 614-635.
    2. Angel Aguiar & Badri Narayanan & Robert McDougall, 2016. "An Overview of the GTAP 9 Data Base," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 1(1), pages 181-208, June.
    3. Buhara Aslan & Merve Mavus Kutuk & Arif Oduncu, 2015. "Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and Trans-Pacific Partnership: Policy Options of China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 23(6), pages 22-43, November.
    4. Leone Walters & Heinrich R. Bohlmann & Matthew W. Clance, 2016. "The Impact of the COMESA-EAC-SADC Tripartite Free Trade Agreement on the South African Economy," Working Papers 201669, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    5. Isabella Alloisio & Alessandro Antimiani & Simone Borghesi & Enrica De Cian & Maria Gaeta & Chiara Martini & Ramiro Parrado & Maria Cristina Tommasino & Elena Verdolini & Maria Rosa Virdis, 2015. "Pathways to Deep Decarbonization in Italy," Working Papers 2015.80, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    6. Nopiah, Ririn & Widodo, Tri, 2019. "Climate Change Mitigation Through Market-based instruments in Large Asian Emitters," MPRA Paper 91230, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Sh. Enkhbayar, 2015. "The Marginal Welfare Burden of Mongolia's Tax System," The Northeast Asian Economic Review, ERINA - Economic Research Institute for Northeast Asia, vol. 3(2), pages 55-68, October.
    8. Badri Narayanan G. & Vasundhara Rungta, 2014. "Export Subsidy Reforms and Productivity Improvements: The Case of the Indian Textile and Clothing Sector," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 8(3), pages 327-352, August.
    9. Enkhbayar Shagdar & Otgonsaikhan Nyamdaa, 2017. "Impacts of Import Tariff Reforms on Mongolia's Economy: CGE Analysis with the GTAP 8.1 Data Base," The Northeast Asian Economic Review, ERINA - Economic Research Institute for Northeast Asia, vol. 5(1), pages 1-25, March.
    10. Andrista, Safira & Widodo, Tri, 2017. "Welfare Impact of ASEAN Economic Integration: “ASEAN Way” Versus Theory," MPRA Paper 80880, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Adams, Philip D., 2008. "Insurance against Catastrophic Climate Change: How Much Will an Emissions Trading Scheme Cost Australia?," Conference papers 331770, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Alvaro Calzadilla & Katrin Rehdanz & Richard Betts & Pete Falloon & Andy Wiltshire & Richard Tol, 2013. "Climate change impacts on global agriculture," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 357-374, September.
    13. Corong, Erwin, 2010. "Global economic crisis, gender and poverty in the Philippines," Conference papers 331939, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Erwin Corong & Thomas Hertel & Robert McDougall & Marinos Tsigas & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2017. "The Standard GTAP Model, version 7," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 2(1), pages 1-119, June.
    15. McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2008. "Asian Growth and Trade Poles: India, China, and East and Southeast Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 210-234, February.
    16. Calzadilla, Alvaro & Rehdanz, Katrin & Tol, Richard S.J., 2008. "Water scarcity and the impact of improved irrigation management: A CGE analysis," Conference papers 331788, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Knobel, Alexander & Chokaev, Bekhan, 2014. "Possible Economic Outcomes of a Trade Agreement with the European Union," EconStor Preprints 121853, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    18. Karov, Vuko & Roberts, Donna & Grant, Jason H. & Peterson, Everett, 2009. "An Empirical Assessment of Phytosanitary Regulations on US Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Imports," Conference papers 331832, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Minor, Peter & Tsigas, Marinos, 2008. "Impacts of Better Trade Facilitation in Developing Countries: Analysis with a New GTAP Database for the Value of Time in Trade," Conference papers 331702, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    20. repec:pra:mprapa:15377 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Ditya Agung Nurdianto, 2016. "Economic Impacts of a Carbon Tax in an Integrated ASEAN," EEPSEA Special and Technical Paper tp201604t5, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Apr 2016.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.