IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332969.html

US Withdrawal From International Trade: Analyzing the Impact on the Global Trading System With a Global CGE Model and a Gravity Model

Author

Listed:
  • Robinson, Sherman
  • Thierfelder, Karen

Abstract

Current US trade policy goals may result in a withdrawal of the US from the global trading system. The impact may be local, as NAFTA is renegotiated, or more widespread, as the US becomes generally more protectionist. We analyze the possible effects on the US economy and on the global trading system using two modelling approaches: (1) a global computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of the world economy to consider trade war scenarios, and (2) a global gravity model to consider scenarios of trade diversion around the US. Analysis of trade share changes using a CGE model is constrained by functional form. Virtually all trade-focused CGE models adopt the “Armington” convention and use a constant elasticity of substitution (CES) function to represent preferences over imports and the domestic variety. All goods are “semi-tradable” and trade shares can only change due to price shocks (e.g., tariff changes). The policy shocks that the US is planning to implement involve a variety of non-tariff approaches and are likely to result in other countries diverting their trade regardless of simple price incentives (e.g., move value chains away from the US). We explore the effects of such non-price changes in trade shares using a new form of a gravity model, focusing directly on quantity trade shares. We use an “entropy gravity model” starting with the initial matrix of global trade shares by country We then specify that the US will reduce its total exports (or sectoral exports) by an exogenous amount. We then specify constraints on the trading system: (1) Country trade balances remain constant, and (2) the volume of global trade remains constant. The result is to focus only on trade diversion. Initial scenario analysis indicates that, globally, countries can divert trade around the US relatively easily (modest changes in trade shares). Countries initially very dependent on the US (e.g., Canada, Mexico) are hurt, but almost all other countries expand their trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2018. "US Withdrawal From International Trade: Analyzing the Impact on the Global Trading System With a Global CGE Model and a Gravity Model," Conference papers 332969, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332969/files/8947.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walmsley, Terrie & Angel Aguiar & Badri Narayanan, 2012. "Introduction to the Global Trade Analysis Project and the GTAP Data Base," GTAP Working Papers 3965, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    2. Scott McDonald & Sherman Robinson & Karen Thierfelder, 2007. "Globe: A SAM Based Global CGE Model using GTAP Data," Departmental Working Papers 14, United States Naval Academy Department of Economics.
    3. World Bank, 2005. "Global Economic Prospects 2005 : Trade, Regionalism and Development," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14783, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2018. "NAFTA collapse, trade war and North American disengagement," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 614-635.
    2. Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2024. "US international trade policy: Scenarios of protectionism and trade wars," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 723-739.
    3. Angel Aguiar & Badri Narayanan & Robert McDougall, 2016. "An Overview of the GTAP 9 Data Base," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 1(1), pages 181-208, June.
    4. Elberry, Ahmed M. & Garaffa, Rafael & Faaij, André & van der Zwaan, Bob, 2024. "A review of macroeconomic modelling tools for analysing industrial transformation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2008. "Asian Growth and Trade Poles: India, China, and East and Southeast Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 210-234, February.
    6. Adams, Philip D., 2008. "Insurance against Catastrophic Climate Change: How Much Will an Emissions Trading Scheme Cost Australia?," Conference papers 331770, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Alvaro Calzadilla & Katrin Rehdanz & Richard S.J. Tol, 2008. "The Eonomic Impact Of More Sustainable Water Use In Agriculture: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis," Working Papers FNU-169, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Dec 2008.
    8. Bussolo, Maurizio & Niimi, Yoko, 2009. "Do Regional Trade Pacts Benefit the Poor? An Illustration from Dominican Republic--Central American Free Trade Agreement in Nicaragua," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 146-160, January.
    9. Peter Walkenhorst, 2013. "Indicators to Monitor Regional Trade Integration in Africa," World Bank Publications - Reports 16658, The World Bank Group.
    10. George Deltas & Klaus Desmet & Giovanni Facchini, 2012. "Hub-and-spoke free trade areas: theory and evidence from Israel," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 45(3), pages 942-977, August.
    11. Patrick Messerlin, 2007. "How Much Further Can the WTO Go? Developed Countries Issues," Working Papers hal-00973103, HAL.
    12. Michael G. Plummer, 2012. "The Emerging “Post-Doha” Agenda and the New Regionalism in the Asia-Pacific," ADBI Working Papers 384, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    13. Fan Zhai, 2010. "The Benefits of Regional Infrastructure Investment in Asia : A Quantitative Exploration," Microeconomics Working Papers 22803, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    14. repec:era:eriabk:2021-impact-of-the-atiga-on-intra-asean-trade is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Mohamed Hedi Bchir & Sébastien Jean & David Laborde, 2006. "Binding Overhang and Tariff-Cutting Formulas," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 142(2), pages 207-232, July.
    16. Anderson, Kym & Valenzuela, Ernesto & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2009. "Welfare and Poverty Effects of Global Agricultural and Trade Policies Using the Linkage Model," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 52785, World Bank.
    17. Agata Antkiewicz & John Whalley, 2006. "BRICSAM and the non–WTO," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 237-261, September.
    18. Alvaro Calzadilla & Katrin Rehdanz & Richard Betts & Pete Falloon & Andy Wiltshire & Richard Tol, 2013. "Climate change impacts on global agriculture," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 357-374, September.
    19. Corong, Erwin, 2010. "Global economic crisis, gender and poverty in the Philippines," Conference papers 331939, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    20. Alloisio, Isabella & Borghesi, Simone & De Cian, Enrica & Gaeta, Maria & Martini, Chiara & Parrado, Ramiro & Tommasino, Maria Cristina & Verdolini, Elena & Maria Rosa, Virdis, "undated". "Pathways to Deep Decarbonization in Italy," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 230582, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
      • Isabella Alloisio & Alessandro Antimiani & Simone Borghesi & Enrica De Cian & Maria Gaeta & Chiara Martini & Ramiro Parrado & Maria Cristina Tommasino & Elena Verdolini & Maria Rosa Virdis, 2015. "Pathways to Deep Decarbonization in Italy," Working Papers 2015.80, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    21. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/faqom67ai2qsojk9j15c04u8j is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Erwin Corong & Thomas Hertel & Robert McDougall & Marinos Tsigas & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2017. "The Standard GTAP Model, version 7," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 2(1), pages 1-119, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.