IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332884.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The economic impact of irrigation water scarcity from climate change: A CGE analysis distinguishing between surface and ground water

Author

Listed:
  • Koopman, Jason
  • Kuik, Onno
  • Tol, Richard
  • Van Der Vat, Marnix
  • Hunink, Joachim
  • Brouwer, Roy

Abstract

A number of climate change scenarios show an increased frequency and severity of droughts in The Netherlands due to reduced precipitation and warming summer temperatures (van den Hurk et al., 2006). Depending on their location farmers may have access to surface water, ground water or both as their irrigation source. In times of water scarcity these different irrigation sources have distinctive characteristics that water managers need to consider in making allocation decisions. To determine the extent of the benefit of increased access to river water in times of water scarcity we employ the multi-regional computable general equilibrium model GTAP-W (Calzadilla et al., 2010), which includes water as an explicit input in agricultural production. The model has been expanded to allow for differentiation between surface and groundwater endowments within individual regions in order to quantify the importance of increased surface water in irrigation as an adaptation response to climate change. The model has been applied to analyze the impact of a drier climate on the agricultural sector and the economy as a whole both in The Netherlands and its upstream neighbors in the Rhine and Meuse river basin, Belgium and Germany. We further examine the benefit of increased water irrigation infrastructure as an additional adaptation response for Dutch agricultural producers and the subsequent effect that the Dutch adaptation response might have on the agricultural markets for the upstream countries Belgium and Germany. The results show that a limited increase in surface water irrigation infrastructure increases the output of all crop sectors including rain fed sectors. However a much larger expansion of irrigated areas increases the demand and price for labor and capital to such an extent that rain fed agricultural sectors decrease as a result. The impacts on the upstream countries are limited but non-negligible.

Suggested Citation

  • Koopman, Jason & Kuik, Onno & Tol, Richard & Van Der Vat, Marnix & Hunink, Joachim & Brouwer, Roy, 2017. "The economic impact of irrigation water scarcity from climate change: A CGE analysis distinguishing between surface and ground water," Conference papers 332884, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332884/files/8779.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berck, Peter & Robinson, Sherman & Goldman, George E, 1990. "The use of computable general equilibrium models to assess water policies," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt082465zv, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    2. Dellink, Rob & Brouwer, Roy & Linderhof, Vincent & Stone, Karin, 2011. "Bio-economic modeling of water quality improvements using a dynamic applied general equilibrium approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 63-79.
    3. Goodman, D. Jay, 2000. "More Reservoirs Or Transfers? A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis Of Projected Water Shortages In The Arkansas River Basin," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Brouwer, Roy & Hofkes, Marjan & Linderhof, Vincent, 2008. "General equilibrium modelling of the direct and indirect economic impacts of water quality improvements in the Netherlands at national and river basin scale," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 127-140, May.
    5. Diao, Xinshen & Roe, Terry & Doukkali, Rachid, 2005. "Economy-wide gains from decentralized water allocation in a spatially heterogenous agricultural economy," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 249-269, June.
    6. Iman Haqiqi & Farzad Taheripour & Jing Liu & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2016. "Introducing Irrigation Water into GTAP Data Base Version 9," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 1(2), pages 116-155, December.
    7. Petra Hellegers & Ekko van Ierland, 2003. "Policy Instruments for Groundwater Management in the Netherlands," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 26(1), pages 163-172, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jason F. L. Koopman & Onno Kuik & Richard S. J. Tol & Roy Brouwer, 2017. "The potential of water markets to allocate water between industry, agriculture, and public water utilities as an adaptation mechanism to climate change," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 325-347, February.
    2. Osman, Rehab & Ferrari, Emanuele & McDonald, Scott, 2019. "Is improving Nile water quality ‘fruitful’?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 20-31.
    3. Thompson, Wyatt & Lu, Yaqiong & Gerlt, Scott & Yang, Xianyu & Campbell, J. Elliott & Kueppers, Lara M. & Snyder, Mark A., 2018. "Automatic Responses of Crop Stocks and Policies Buffer Climate Change Effects on Crop Markets and Price Volatility," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 98-105.
    4. Onil Banerjee & Martin Cicowiez & Mark Horridge & Renato Vargas, 2016. "A Conceptual Framework for Integrated Economic-Environmental Modelling," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0202, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    5. Eamen, Leila & Brouwer, Roy & Razavi, Saman, 2020. "The economic impacts of water supply restrictions due to climate and policy change: A transboundary river basin supply-side input-output analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Bauer, Dana Marie & Sue Wing, Ian, 2016. "The macroeconomic cost of catastrophic pollinator declines," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1-13.
    7. Nicholas Kilimani, 2014. "Water Taxation and the Double Dividend Hypothesis," Working Papers 201451, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    8. Mohamed A. Chemingui & Chokri Thabet, 2016. "Economy-Wide Analysis of Alternative Water Management Policies: A Comparative Analysis for Morocco and Tunisia," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(04), pages 1-27, December.
    9. Cakmak, Erol H. & Dudu, Hasan & Saracoglu, Sirin & Diao, Xinshen & Roe, Terry & Tsur, Yacov, 2008. "Macro-Micro Feedback Links Of Irrigation Water Management In Turkey," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4781, The World Bank.
    10. Teotónio, Carla & Rodríguez, Miguel & Roebeling, Peter & Fortes, Patrícia, 2020. "Water competition through the ‘water-energy’ nexus: Assessing the economic impacts of climate change in a Mediterranean context," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Cyril Bourgeois & Pierre-Alain Jayet & Florence Habets & Pascal Viennot, 2018. "Estimating the Marginal Social Value of Agriculturally Driven Nitrate Concentrations in an Aquifer: A Combined Theoretical-Applied Approach," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(01), pages 1-30, January.
    12. Al-Riffai, Perrihan & Breisinger, Clemens & Mondal, Md. Hossain Alam & Ringler, Claudia & Wiebelt, Manfred & Zhu, Tingju, 2017. "Linking the economics of water, energy, and food: A nexus modeling approach," MENA working papers 4, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Na Li & Xiaojun Wang & Minjun Shi & Hong Yang, 2015. "Economic Impacts of Total Water Use Control in the Heihe River Basin in Northwestern China—An Integrated CGE-BEM Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Jacobsen, Lars-Bo & Nielsen, Max & Nielsen, Rasmus, 2016. "Gains of integrating sector-wise pollution regulation: The case of nitrogen in Danish crop production and aquaculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 172-181.
    15. Jason F.L. Koopman & Onno Kuik & Richard S.J. Tol & Roy Brouwer, 2015. "Water Scarcity From Climate Change And Adaptation Response In An International River Basin Context," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(01), pages 1-22.
    16. Alvaro Calzadilla & Katrin Rehdanz & Richard S.J. Tol, 2008. "The Eonomic Impact Of More Sustainable Water Use In Agriculture: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis," Working Papers FNU-169, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Dec 2008.
    17. Dinar, Ariel, 2012. "Economy-wide implications of direct and indirect policy interventions in the water sector: lessons from recent work and future research needs," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6068, The World Bank.
    18. Manning, Dale T. & Lurbé, Salvador & Comas, Louise H. & Trout, Thomas J. & Flynn, Nora & Fonte, Steven J., 2018. "Economic viability of deficit irrigation in the Western US," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 114-123.
    19. Scott Mcdonald & Sanri Reynolds & Melt Van Schoor, 2006. "Economic Impact Of A Provincial Fuel Levy: A Cge Analysis," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 74(3), pages 422-441, September.
    20. Glyn Wittwer & Mark Horridge, 2018. "SinoTERM365, Bottom-up Representation of China at the Prefectural Level," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-285, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.